The Tariq Nasheed Thread

[yung Herbie Hancock]

He's not wrong. Between her empathy for sexual predators and refusing to define what a woman is, she makes Sotomayor and Kagan cringe with how radical she is. She'll sit on the SC for 30+ if she's confirmed. She's a Trojan Horse for further degeneracy.

She was put up there for the LGBTQ agenda and the possible inclusion of pedophiles into LGBTQ. Keep in mind that some of them are trying to make "Minor Attracted Persons" become an actual thing. Also her uncle and others in her famuly are cops so Biden saw that top cop in her. That lockheed Martin case is a tell tale sign too.

 

[Skooby]

She married to a white man. I feel like I know why she got picked now.


I’m not voting Democrat again until they start seeing straight black men who love black women as leaders.

Black men and women with ancestry in this country. Our particular ethnic group still has not reached the two highest offices in this country.

 

[invincible1914]

dummy

There are different ways to disenfranchise black men. What the democrats are doing happens to often to not be on purpose.

Edit: The more you dig, the more you find.

Ed:

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

There is a huge disinformation, conspiracy and division campaign going on within the coli, and frankly all this Tariq Nasheed propaganda is at the center of it.

This board lets it fester under the cover of pro blackness.

Not sure how this was racism. This was spot on

 

[The God Poster]

Dude pushes republican lies at every opportunity and what's worse is that many negroes are so susceptible to misinformation that they believe it. We're so susceptible to misinformation cause we are so uninformed and choose not to educate ourselves on key issues. Really puts into perspective my people are destroyed for lack of knowledge because thou hast rejected knowledge.

You’re MAGA tho

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

She was put up there for the LGBTQ agenda and the possible inclusion of pedophiles into LGBTQ. Keep in mind that some of them are trying to make "Minor Attracted Persons" become an actual thing. Also her uncle and others in her famuly are cops so Biden saw that top cop in her. That lockheed Martin case is a tell tale sign too.

This section attracts the dumbest motherfukkers.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Black men and women with ancestry in this country. Our particular ethnic group still has not reached the two highest offices in this country.

That's a wild goalpost shift considering the original comment was a complaint about Ketanji Jackson.

 

[BlackJesus]

right about what, stupid?

how fukking dumb are you to think the supreme court deals with individual pedophile cases?

goddamn republican bootlickers. Again, y'all dgaf about Brett Kavanaugh or Trump (or Thompson) who actually did committ sexual harrassment.

right about what, stupid?

how fukking dumb are you to think the supreme court deals with individual pedophile cases?

goddamn republican bootlickers. Again, y'all dgaf about Brett Kavanaugh or Trump (or Thompson) who actually did committ sexual harrassment.

I got this nikka so mad he’s putting words in my mouth

When did I ever anything about Supreme Court cases? lol

 

[Professor Emeritus]

There are different ways to disenfranchise black men. What the democrats are doing happens to often to not be on purpose.

Your argument was so "strong" you included two new reps and a teenage girl who has never held a position of power in her life.

All of them except Pressley have held more powerful positions in Democratic leadership than the majority of the people in your pictures.

And I didn't have to randomly include a Latina for no reason like you did.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

This section attracts the dumbest motherfukkers.

I saw that shyt and was thinking, "He has to be trolling."

But it got 5 daps.

 

[invincible1914]

Your argument was so "strong" you included two new reps and a teenage girl who has never held a position of power in her life.

All of them except Pressley have held more powerful positions in Democratic leadership than the majority of the people in your pictures.

And I didn't have to randomly include a Latina for no reason like you did.

So there's no agenda?

I know people just be styling to win e-arguments. But something isn't sitting right with me. I can't quite put my finger on it.

I feel as if if you're black + straight + male = three strikes and you're not part of either party's plan going forward.

I just don't see it. Tell me something better. Am I voting for my own disenfranchisement?

 

[Umoja]

You’re MAGA tho

It is kind of sad that we live in a world where his over the top support of what is wrong isn't immediately picked up as satire.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

So there's no agenda?

I know people just be styling to win e-arguments. But something isn't sitting right with me. I can't quite put my finger on it.

I feel as if if you're black + straight + male = three strikes and you're not part of either party's plan going forward.

I just don't see it. Tell me something better.

I don't know what else to say. I literally just posted a bunch of heterosexual black couples who have had major positions of power in the Democratic party. Since the claim of an "agenda" is based on a few random pictures of people in interracial relationships, how else do you want me to debunk it?

The previous Democratic president (Barack Obama) was a Black heterosexual male married to a Black woman. Of the 5 Democratic leaders in the House right now, 2 (James Clyburn and Hakeem Jeffries) are Black heterosexual men and they're both married to Black women. There are two Black senators now (Corey Booker and Raphael Warnock) and they're both heterosexual Black men who were married to or dating Black women. The most recent Black governor (Deval Patrick) was a Black heterosexual male married to a Black woman.


Since there's zero actual evidence of an "agenda" against heterosexual men, what do you want me to do other than point out all the examples that prove you wrong?

 

[invincible1914]

I don't know what else to say. I literally just posted a bunch of heterosexual black couples who have had major positions of power in the Democratic party. Since the claim of an "agenda" is based on a few random pictures of people in interracial relationships, how else do you want me to debunk it?

The previous Democratic president (Barack Obama) was a Black heterosexual male married to a Black woman. Of the 5 Democratic leaders in the House right now, 2 (James Clyburn and Hakeem Jeffries) are Black heterosexual men and they're both married to Black women. There are two Black senators now (Corey Booker and Raphael Warnock) and they're both heterosexual Black men who were married to or dating Black women. The most recent Black governor (Deval Patrick) was a Black heterosexual male married to a Black woman.


Since there's zero actual evidence of an "agenda" against heterosexual men, what do you want me to do other than point out all the examples that prove you wrong?

I guess you won. There's no conspiracy or agenda against heterosexual black men.

Edit: I'm just not in a good mood today. Bout to clock out early.

 

[Dameon Farrow]

This nikka go at every black person he sees

But turn around and get mad when other people do the exact same thing

it's because he and others like him are actually funded by Republicans. Telling folks not to vote on some kind of twisted 'rebel' and 'they don't do anything for you' bs is a dead giveaway. They pretend to be woke and down but they really have other agendas. Folks look at me crazy when I say this but all the proof is there.

There is nobody. I repeat NOBODY on the right that tells folks not to vote and that there vote doesn't count. Except for Trump and he's an imbecile.