Internal growth or maybe trading pieces that don't fit for ones that do. Just because you can't major FA's doesn't mean that you overpay for the ones currently on your roster that don't amount to getting out of the basement or play-in tournament. Regardless of how you spin, that core just won't work long term and it will be the same issue again next season.
I hear your general concerns but the element I think you're overlooking is this ....cap space is only valuable if you have someone worthy of it to spend it on If you're not a FA destination you're either going to have money burning a hole in your pocket or you're going to end up using it to overpay an external guy into going to a place that's not a hot commodity...a Laker dollar is worth more that a Thunder dollar and that's something you have to consider when working out your internal negotiations ... A good front office should be self aware ...
We haven't had "long term" to test your theory on core workability so I don't know where you're drawing such certainty from with this take ...either way we'll see moving forward
Having flaws is generally the case for most players even the HOF's I don't think pointing out a player not being perfect is a good sole justification for saying you think his team may let him walk for nothing ... What he does provide however ..Playmaking / Shooting / Defense / Size are commodities not easily found on the open marketLonzo inconsistency on offense is going to hold him back from being lead guard material unless you bring in a wing that helps mask his deficiencies. You cannot have your lead guard be inconsistent on offense regardless of how you try and spin it. It's the same complaint we make about other players and Lonzo isn't the exception. I understand people are bias about Lonzo, but let's be real about his flaws.
Last edited: