Good luck supporting yourself.That's my philosophy brehs
Good luck supporting yourself.That's my philosophy brehs
Monarchists derived their "value" from physical power and saying "god let them reign"If that's your response after reading this article, it's clear your opposition to socialism isn't based on any sort of logic. If economic democracy would be against your material interests, you can say it and just be honest
How does it feel to be ideological kin to monarchists and aristocrats? Sub in "democratic" for "communist" in your post and you have a monarchist's argument against democracy in the 1700s ("Ancient Greece fell and Rome turned into an empire... Democracy doesn't work. It was tried and it failed. No democracy has ever been successful.")
This is what already happens...and this has NOTHING to do with socialism. Nothing.
I've been saying this for a while. Every Congressman and Senator should be coming back to their districts every few months showing what they've accomplished/voted on during that time and the people vote whether it's acceptable or not. Three strikes and you're out.
Why? Socialist evangelists do it all the time.Don't compare other countries with different circumstances to 2015 America.
1. convincing the poor/middle class to invent things and participate in the largest expansion of capital in human history.Biggest victories of capitalism :
1. Convincing the poor and the middle-class that it works in their favor
2. Convincing everybody that capitalist countries do not use socialist policies
3. Convincing everybody that there is "no other way"
What size are your chains?Capitalism = slavery
Its why the Marshall Plan had to be done.I don't understand what is appealing about socialism. Or why brehs are attracted to it. Black Wall Street was great until it was destroyed
What a silly argument. It was the 1920s regardless. Black people were going to have a shytty hand for a while.Post is empty on content
What was the black poverty rate at black wall street's peak?
Its not high-minded. Its what children come up with when they want to pretend tehy're all equal and deserve everything equally. It doesn't promote innovation and doesnt incentive growth.Socialism is appealing because it's the most high minded, egalitarian society imaginable.
Again, socialism is low hanging fruit because instead of incentivizing more concrete gains made via capitalism, it seeks to put everyone on equal footing without respecting the role of social stratification that has more of a role to play in societal exploitation than outright economic exploitation.Equality generally appeals to all exploited peoples, as this article notes. Black Americans are among history's most exploited cohorts; which is why socialism has played a crucial role in virtually all black struggles and why most black leaders of note were either sympathetic to or were socialists themselves.
Poor is a relative term. And i'm ok with this.You understand that capitalism literally requires poor people correct?
They're unfair, but we live in a mixed economy.You understand that free markets are impossible?
Which is why Dupont can't dump chemicals in the middle of your local river anymoreCrony capitalism is capitalism in its functional form.
How are you defining poor here?
if you are claiming capitalism requires poverty....
We're not debating regulations. Regulations are good. Not all regulations are good. Learn the difference.Ahistorical analysis. Without regulations the entire western world would have succumbed to soviet style Bolshevism or another leftism during the 10s, 20s, and 30s. There's never been a man who did as much for capitalism as FDR.
The internet.Kindly point out one example of a functioning unencumbered free market or explain why there hasn't been such an example
So? That doesn't make them good arguments. He merely compiled his observations in a way that appealed to people who overcorrected for shytty economic fortunes. Most of that corner of the world was GOING to always be in the dumps.Karl Marx's numerous contributions to multiple fields of study are universally recognized.
Why, because you agree with him?He's inarguably one of the most brilliant men of the past 500 years
I don't respect men. I respect their work.The right wing echo chamber you reside in is one of the few circles of learning in the world that disregards his writings in their entirety.
No. Its not. Its what happens when you're successful. There are no guaranteed winners.Is profit not rooted in exploitation?
By having enough people who want to sell their shyt there who can't survive on their own, thus coercing them into submitting to Walmart's strict warehousing and product schedules. And meeting stock market demands.How does Wal-Mart sell cheap goods?
Which is a lot more than you can say about socialism. You can't save everyone and I need you to say this.Capitalism improves upon feudalism in that it uplifts more out of destitution.
You want a perfect system, and you won't ever get it.However they are too few, and those outside too many. Thus capitalism destroys itself and such
What was the black poverty rate at black wall street's peak? Are you talking about in ok or across the country?
You understand that capitalism literally requires poor people correct?
So what? I don't understand the problem. There is always going to be people who are less fortunate in any system. In nature not every male gets to mate. You just have to do the best you can to make sure it's not you.
You understand that free markets are impossible?
This is simply not true. But I want you to elaborate further on this comment.
Crony capitalism is capitalism in its functional form.