Cliffs on why Russia is invading Ukraine
Exactly and republicans voters only want war with black or brown nations now. They openly support Russia because they see it as bastion of white supremacy.Uhh…those who voted for him don’t want war. We aren’t Republicans.
Cliffs on why Russia is invading Ukraine
From whats been going on the past few weeks i dont think Nato or the US is going to do anything other than sanctions and sending military equipment.
You're sister is dating an op and he wants to move in with her at the family house.Cliffs on why Russia is invading Ukraine
But many in Eastern Ukraine want to maintain their close ties to Russia.Outside of separatists they don’t want to be part of the Russian federation
russia invading ukraine dont mean ww3
It's less a bluff for Russia than it is a strategic maneuver to either ensure they have strong support on their orders or to force the hand of NATO (i.e. the U.S. and U.K.).Putin didnt bluff. Probably get sanctioned and nothing else. Meanwhile seems like nato and their allies been bluffing from the jump.
Ukraine has a long history with Russia. It was a part of the USSR. After the collapse of the USSR, the United States began pushing for strong relationships with former Soviet-bloc countries, and "joining NATO" was the easiest way to do it. That then allowed them to bring them into the financialization fold, and also allowed them to gain a strategic military advantage. What is very rarely talked about is that after the "fall" of the USSR, the new economy introduced by the West led to massive issues with these countries' economies, and the quality of life dropped massively - Ukraine was one of these countries. A huge chunk of it is ethnically and linguistically Russian, and that chunk wants to retain ties with Russia. The other portion of the country isn't and wants to join the fold of the Western European nations.Cliffs on why Russia is invading Ukraine
Then turn the news off p*ssy. You'll hear about it when war pops off. Until stfu.Why don’t you educate us then, fakkit? Obviously the breh is anxious and tired of this shyt.
"Largest war in Europe" is the key phrase here.
Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East all have ongoing military conflicts due to Western interference and proxy wars. Why not another one?
And both France and the U.K. backing this is laughable.
It's less a bluff for Russia than it is a strategic maneuver to either ensure they have strong support on their orders or to force the hand of NATO (i.e. the U.S. and U.K.).
Ukraine has a long history with Russia. It was a part of the USSR. After the collapse of the USSR, the United States began pushing for strong relationships with former Soviet-bloc countries, and "joining NATO" was the easiest way to do it. That then allowed them to bring them into the financialization fold, and also allowed them to gain a strategic military advantage. What is very rarely talked about is that after the "fall" of the USSR, the new economy introduced by the West led to massive issues with these countries' economies, and the quality of life dropped massively - Ukraine was one of these countries. A huge chunk of it is ethnically and linguistically Russian, and that chunk wants to retain ties with Russia. The other portion of the country isn't and wants to join the fold of the Western European nations.
The U.S. is pushing for the country to join the West, has armed and trained some of the right-wing and neo-Nazi portions of Ukraine, and as such - has directly implemented the split.
Russia wants control on their side.