They dont...
They dont...
...what???????
What?
Thats what YOU are doing.
I never claimed they were innate. I'm saying that what people CALL innate rights were in fact created.
I like how you dress this sentence up to make it sound more profound than it actually is.
...and it still doesn't make any sense.
Arbitrary law doesn't claim to have objective truth. Thats the point.
Plus, the supernatural tenets invoked by religion doesn't lend any credibility to its utility.
Keep trying.
My problem with religious people isn't their view on how to rule the world, its the source of where they get that inspiration.
if you wanted to say you were against abortion because of reasons you had OUTSIDE of some supernatural deity, then I'd listen to your argument.
Religious people ALWAYS will lose by invoking a supernatural third party who claims superiority over everyone in the discussion.
Politicians who source their plans in reality and not from a 1st century goat herder TEND to have more valid points.