GetInTheTruck
Member
If the Ancient Egyptians were Black, he(Jesus) would've had to look similar to them. People are applying modern day demographics to back then.
So are you when you use the word "black."
If the Ancient Egyptians were Black, he(Jesus) would've had to look similar to them. People are applying modern day demographics to back then.
How when the Middle East was part of African territory and the Israelites were a African raceNo, criticizing White Jesus isn't self-hate, because Jesus obviously wasn't White, but obsessively trying to prove he was Black against all the evidence while ignoring actual African history is subtle self-hate.
That's the historical consensus. You should probably read a couple posts on the previous two pages.
In Revelation 1: 14-15
14 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;
I beheld till thrones were placed, and one that was ancient of days did sit: his raiment was as white snow, and the hair of his head like pure wool; his throne was fiery flames, and the wheels thereof burning fire.
I think it's best to not even take dude serious bro, look at the join date, the screen name and obvious troll factor, coupled with most of 85% of his post since he joined happens to be in this thread and you have the makings of a troll. To say what does it matter that Jesus was brown, black, purple etc, but then argue the point that he was anything other than black/brown (which people of African descent come in all those shades) is intentionally undermining not only historical and biblical accounts, it also defies common sense. It matters enough to the scholar's looking to keep up the fallacy that the Hebrews, Moses, Jesus and Egyptians weren't of African descent; even though there is a general consensus among their own scholar's that Egypt was predominately African to admixed until the end of the dynastic period generally.
As far as Africa not having any influence outside the continent of Africa, might want to do some honest research, instead of looking to troll. There has been Egyptian artifacts found in the Grand Canyon back in 1909, not to mention the Olmecs being of African heritage, along with an African presence here in North America way before Columbus "discovered" America. So yes it's important enough to those who have evidence of the historical aspect of the bible and African civilizations and history to suppress and even erase it from official records. Because to them its obviously important enough to try to squelch, so it should be important to any person seeking real truth to learn and understand why.
This image is from the 6th century and as early as then you can already see artists depicting Jesus as closer to white looking than black. I'm not denying the Borgia painting was influential, but the white Jesus depictions didn't originate with him.
Yet that's where they originate...? Or have ancestry from...? Afro-Asiatic anyone? Ancient Egyptians?Jesus wasn't black, he was arab.
Don't dishonor our ancestors breh, western Abrahamic religion was no where near Africa.
Does any native African tribe have any oral/written history of the black jesus?
Or is this only american nikkas that were forced into Christianity acting like they found a loop hole.
fine
did he turn water into wine? is he in the clouds watching everytihng you do?
Why is there such an obsession on this forum to make the ancient Israelites black?
Turning water to wine isn't impossile
jesus was taught in mystery schools of egypt the founders of chemistry