The official ‘Tory Lanez vs Megan Thee Stallion’ trial thread.

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,376
Reputation
-34,322
Daps
617,907
Reppin
The Deep State
If someone shoots a gun around you, you will more than likely have GSR on you. Thats not an indictment in itself.

But I agree. It doesn't exonerate her. But at the same time, common sense and logic has all the cards against Tory. Thats all im saying.

Especially when your clearing people of bejng suspects, knowing you got a court dage coming, and knowing your the main culprit. Make it make sense?
EYE WITNESS SAYS FIRST SHOT CAME FROM FEMALE/KELSEY
 

Nigerianwonder

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
6,560
Reputation
1,826
Daps
29,296
Reppin
NULL
I can't believe people the jury and the male feminazis think Meg and Kelsey are telling the truth. Even a retard can hear their contradictions.

They don't care whether they told the truth. Reality is a black man is always guilty until proven innocent in this country. The jury was looking for proof he didnt do it instead of proof he did beyond a reasonable doubt. He was guilty once the jury saw a tatted up black man as the defendant. That's the only context in which this verdict makes sense. Tory is a fool but Black men have never had the presumption of innocence in this country which is a fundamental right. Legally we are treated as second class citizens.

There is no other gender or race of people who would have been found guilty of all 3 charges under the exact same circumstances. Swap Tory for a blonde haired white woman or white man and what would the jury think? The DA didnt even bother to investigate the fight between meg and kelsey before the shooting.

We can dead this narrative that black women are not protected and not believed. Cause the legal system has always protected black women at the expense of black men. And this have shown that black women can be believed even when proven to be lying under oath. But we already knew it easy to throw a black man in Jail.
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
11,349
Reputation
2,682
Daps
38,252
Reppin
Los Angeles
5 rounds

kelsey shot one or more

which one hit meg?
It was either of them, but the fact they had 47 other pieces of evidence to the defense’s 4 including the victim pointing out who shot her, the defense’s 3rd party eyewitness lowkey saying at best he shot rounds too, the charges being about him shooting, etc.

As the defense at best you can say the testimonies don’t quite match. At best. That’s actually not quite good because people forget details all the time and people understand that.

At the end of the day, it was much closer to indicating he shot her than she shot her.

Dude really should have taken the deal for 1 year. There was too much evidence to think you can win that, especially when you compare the punishment.

Bottom line, dude could be a free man right now if he took that plea. People like Ak and Twitter gassed him up to fight/attack her character and thinking that’d win over the evidence. Straight stupidity.
 
Last edited:

Korang

Rookie
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
88
Reputation
16
Daps
154
tory hoping it would die down is not absolving kelsey of having GSR and a witness pinning a flash on her
If someone shoots a gun around you, you will more than likely have GSR on you. Thats not an indictment in itself.

But I agree. It doesn't exonerate her. But at the same time, common sense and logic has all the cards against Tory. Thats all im saying.

Especially when your clearing people of bejng suspects, knowing you got a court dage coming, and knowing your the main culprit. Make it make sense
EYE WITNESS SAYS FIRST SHOT CAME FROM FEMALE/KELSEY
Ok. So Kelsey can be on trial too. But like I said there is way more evidence of Tory commiting the crime than anyone else
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,376
Reputation
-34,322
Daps
617,907
Reppin
The Deep State
If someone shoots a gun around you, you will more than likely have GSR on you. Thats not an indictment in itself.

But I agree. It doesn't exonerate her. But at the same time, common sense and logic has all the cards against Tory. Thats all im saying.

Especially when your clearing people of bejng suspects, knowing you got a court dage coming, and knowing your the main culprit. Make it make sense

Ok. So Kelsey can be trial too. But like I said there is way more evidence of Tory commiting the crime than anyone else
Eye witness firmly says Kelsey shot that gun VISUALLY

AND

Kelsey has GSR

=

Same evidence Tory has

...

We have 5 bullets to account for.
 

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
60,694
Reputation
9,179
Daps
201,532
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
If someone shoots a gun around you, you will more than likely have GSR on you. Thats not an indictment in itself.

But I agree. It doesn't exonerate her. But at the same time, common sense and logic has all the cards against Tory. Thats all im saying.

Especially when your clearing people of bejng suspects, knowing you got a court dage coming, and knowing your the main culprit. Make it make sense

Ok. So Kelsey can be on trial too. But like I said there is way more evidence of Tory commiting the crime than anyone else
Take a look at the 47 pieces of evidence. It could be like the "mounds" of evidence Amber had against Johnny which turned out to be straight up bullshyt.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,376
Reputation
-34,322
Daps
617,907
Reppin
The Deep State
It was either of them, but the fact they had 47 other pieces of evidence to the defense’s 4 including the victim pointing out who shot her, the defense’s 3rd party eyewitness lowkey saying at best he shot rounds too, the charges being about him shooting, etc.

As the defense at best you can say the testimonies don’t quite match. At best. That’s actually not quite good because people forget details all the time and people understand that.

At the end of the day, it was much closer to indicating he shot her than she shot her.

Dude really should have taken the deal for 1 year. There was too much evidence to think you can win that, especially when you compare the punishment.

Bottom line, dude could be a free man right now if he took that plea. People like Ak and Twitter gassed him up to fight/attack her character. Straight stupidity.
Meg doesn't know who shot her

She looked back and saw tory with the gun.

Eye witness/3rd Party has enough to put the gun also in Kelsey's hands AND we have GSR

You can't keep skipping that.

The last person with the weapon is not the person who may have shot Meg.
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
11,349
Reputation
2,682
Daps
38,252
Reppin
Los Angeles
Meg doesn't know who shot her

She looked back and saw tory with the gun.

Eye witness/3rd Party has enough to put the gun also in Kelsey's hands AND we have GSR

You can't keep skipping that.

The last person with the weapon is not the person who may have shot Meg.
Problem is Tory also said she didn’t shoot her.

Like I said, you’d have to do the ultimate spin to flip it.

They even tried to play the “her diss record lyrics” game…

At that point, take the fukking plea for 1 year. It’s too big of a battle.
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,376
Reputation
-34,322
Daps
617,907
Reppin
The Deep State
Problem is Tory also said she didn’t shoot her.

Like I said, you’d have to do the ultimate spin to flip it. They even tried to play the “her diss record lyrics” game…
Thats irrelevant and we dont need statements. We have evidence.

Tory never said that in court. He said that on IG before the charges came hoping no one would tell who did what.

Again, tory is not about to openly implicate his sneaky link BEFORE the charges dropped.
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
11,349
Reputation
2,682
Daps
38,252
Reppin
Los Angeles
It’s funny: everyone came up off Tory this trial.

Streamers.
Lawyers.
Manosphere Twitter.
Barbs Twitter.

They all built or at least enhanced their platform/reputation off this Tory situation. That’s why they encouraged him to fight.

However, none of them got to deal with the real world consequences of encouraging Tory to fight a losing battle.

They basically like that person who takes you to the cleaners during a divorce and gets with a new somebody. Onto the next one for them.

Played the dude for content rather than being a true friend and saying take the plea.

They ate good for two years off this shyt. You watch, how many of these people will care two months from now?

They pretty much saw Meg Thee Stallion and quickly asked how they can be attached and get kickback clout. Period.
 
Last edited:

Umoja

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
14,997
Reputation
3,213
Daps
104,004
Meg doesn't know who shot her

She looked back and saw tory with the gun.

Eye witness/3rd Party has enough to put the gun also in Kelsey's hands AND we have GSR

You can't keep skipping that.

The last person with the weapon is not the person who may have shot Meg.
It doesn't actually matter who shot Meg. You said it yourself, these are the charges:
  1. assault with a semi-automatic firearm (personal use of a firearm)
  2. carrying a loaded, unregistered firearm in a vehicle
  3. discharging a firearm with gross negligence
We dont know who shot meg. This is a gun case. This isn't about Meg.​
Kelsey wasn't charged when she fired the first shot.​
Why?​

Assault with a semi-automatic firearm can be committed by pointing a gun in someone's direction, hitting them with it, or firing the gun at them. The bullets don't actually have to make contact.

Tory was cooked the moment the independent witness identified him as firing bullets in all directions.

As for why Kelsey wasn't charged, there was not enough evidence. If she did shoot at Meg, Tory can blame himself for not being upfront when questioned.
 

Korang

Rookie
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
88
Reputation
16
Daps
154
Thats irrelevant and we dont need statements. We have evidence.

Tory never said that in court. He said that on IG before the charges came hoping no one would tell who did what.

Again, tory is not about to openly implicate his sneaky link BEFORE the charges dropped.
“Whose hand did you see the flashes from first?” George Mgdesyan, Lanez’s lawyer, asked.

“The girl,” Kelly replied. “But they were all together, they were very close together.”

“Did you state that it looked like he was taking the gun away from her?” Mgdesyan pressed.

“I believe that they were fighting. Then he had the gun, and he started shooting,” Kelly said.


Kelly said the “short guy” fired four or five shots while shouting a “torrent of abuse.”

“He was going crazy,” Kelly said, “really agitated.”

Kelly testified that it was after he heard the four or five gunshots that the female victim who had been “kicking all the time” fell to the street “bleeding.”

 
Top