The official ‘Tory Lanez vs Megan Thee Stallion’ trial thread.

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,476
Reputation
-34,327
Daps
618,063
Reppin
The Deep State
This is the exact same conclusion I came to as well. Tory at the end of the day has no motive at all to shoot Meg, which is why this always seemed strange to me. It's very obvious Kelsey is the one who shot at Meg, Tory dumbass should have just let them hoes fight.
Nah. Kelsey was gonna “Selena” Meg if he doesn’t grab the gun.

Plus, the prosecutor wants you to believe the motive is mocking Tory’s music. Like wtf?!
 

leoc

All Star
Bushed
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Messages
814
Reputation
75
Daps
2,764
Read above breh :snoop:

lol. you linking to constructive possession still doesn't change the fact the accused needs to have knowledge. i'm not talking about whether tory will be guilty for that charge or not. just admit your original post was wrong breh. its ok.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,476
Reputation
-34,327
Daps
618,063
Reppin
The Deep State
People saying “Kelsey texted that Tory shot Meg”

Lol ofcourse she did. The bytch is a liar and has said so in court. Self preservation.

She also didn’t have a ride. She didn’t give a fuk about seeing Meg at the hospital
Precisely. She knew how to set the paper trail and pin blame because she refused to acknowledge she could be responsible.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,066
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,880
Reppin
Tha Land
lol. you linking to constructive possession still doesn't change the fact the accused needs to have knowledge. i'm not talking about whether tory will be guilty for that charge or not. just admit your original post was wrong breh. its ok.
“Constructive possession” is the same as actual possession in the court of law
At law, a person with constructive possession stands in the same legal position as a person with actual possession.

Read what’s there. The owner of the vehicle does not have to have knowledge of the items in the car.

Ignorance is never a defense in the court of law.
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
72,438
Reputation
15,098
Daps
279,093
Reppin
The Truth
“Constructive possession” is the same as actual possession in the court of law


Read what’s there. The owner of the vehicle does not have to have knowledge of the items in the car.

Ignorance is never a defense in the court of law.
Damn bruh, you got 300 posts in this thread… by yourself out of like 5k views

Either you really like Meg or you really want to see this black dude go to jail.

Pardi that you?
 
Top