The official ‘Tory Lanez vs Megan Thee Stallion’ trial thread.
- Thread starter Danny Ocean
- Start date
What we expecting brehs
So we not supposed to post messages on a message board?
I just took an interest in the case and the TLR He-man woman hater club likes to argue
I’m only annoying cause you don’t like what i post.dude is ANNOYING af
If people in the thread are arguing over a legal definition and i post a link to said legal definition and that makes y’all mad, then you weren’t in fact looking for the truth, you were looking for confirmation of your own opinion.
That ain’t my fault
yes, i know what constructive possession is.
its ignorance of a/the law is not an excuse. not ignorance is not a defence. no one is claiming ignorance as a defence.
knowledge: scroll down to 1.6
25400 PC - Carrying a Concealed Weapon - California Law
California Penal Code § 25400 PC makes it a crime to carry a concealed firearm on your person or in a vehicle unless you have a valid CCW permit.
www.shouselaw.com
Looking like no truth will be had here. At least let them perform a few tracks before dismissal from hung jury
No. Ignorance is not a defense. Otherwise no one would ever be charged with possession of anything cause they would just say “I don’t know how it got there” shyt don’t work like that brehyes, i know what constructive possession is.
its ignorance of a/the law is not an excuse. not ignorance is not a defence. no one is claiming ignorance as a defence.
knowledge:
25400 PC - Carrying a Concealed Weapon - California Law
California Penal Code § 25400 PC makes it a crime to carry a concealed firearm on your person or in a vehicle unless you have a valid CCW permit.
Read your own link
Says nothing about the person needing explicit knowledge that the firearm is in their possession.
1.6 You would have to prove you don’t know. Which would be impossible unless you got someone else willing to take the charge.
EzekelRAGE
Superstar
This is because Meg said she was injured from stepping on glass
I put him on ignore. Obvious he can't have a discussion and is stanning for meg.dude is ANNOYING af
I presented a direct quote of why Tory's team didnt call the driver and this nikka said "They said that out loud.......but" and then went on to make up shyt
"They said that out loud......but"
2.1 specifically talks about this issue.
2.1 explains knowledge. Which was the original point here, you said only way to avoid being guilty is if someone else takes the fall. That is not true, i’ve shown that knowledge can be a defence. You’re still arguing over random stuff trying to change the original point. You were wrong breh, it happens
I think it became that when people denied right away that Megan even got shot lol , or are even bringing up her sexual history as if that's an excuse to get shot at .
Just waiting for this dude to be found guilty and see all the reactions here from the #ManosphereBoyz
No it became that when Meg literally said black men don't protect black women over this and went on a whole protect black women campaign,
Been thru this situation before myself ….in California ..if nobody admits to the weapon being theirs ..they can and will often times charge the owner of the vehicle
This same tired ass tactic is rampant on this site tho lol
Just look at how people talk about Ye or Kyrie Irving in other threads. You can’t love our people and have any criticism towards anything them two nikkas do. You’re immediately labeled a self hating tap dancer if you do. I guess them nikkas represent the entire race
It’s just an overplayed fallacy tactic people use to gaslight others into agreeing. The idea is “well I don’t hate black women nor do I want to give off the impression that I do, so I’ll stand with Meg regardless of what’s presented to me specifically so that I’m not what they’re accusing me of being”
What’s funny is these people don’t even realize its literally manipulation
Again. You have to prove that. Can’t just say “i didn’t know” There has to be some other evidence or circumstance for you to get off with that defense. Maybe you are driving someone else’s car or you can prove it was in someone else’s bag. Something like that. And even that would be hard to prove without a confession from someone else.
Like we’ve seen this a million times.
Rapper tour bus gets pulled over with 30 nikkas in it. A gun is found. Who gets charged?
The police don’t just go “well everyone said they didn’t know it was on the bus so nothing to see here“
Same here.
Not in cali but i was driving my car with a group of people. Weed was found. Everybody played dumb. I was charged. That’s how it works fair or not.
dr. pill biden
All Star
do celebs in LA even own the cars they drive tho? or if its the posession of the driver, how do they define driver cuz tory’s driver was driving