The white guy placed Kelsey with the gun first. If it’s Tory’s gun, how did Kelsey know exactly where to go get it from when she decided to use it during the fight with Megan?
The official ‘Tory Lanez vs Megan Thee Stallion’ trial thread.
- Thread starter Danny Ocean
- Start date
more lies 
Meg literally can't remember parts of the night and Kelsey passed out at one point.
I think that tells me enough
It hasn’t been said one way or the other if the gun was Tory’s. I’m leaning towards it NOT being his because wouldn’t that be something the Prosecution would jump on?
Kelsey has said she was in a “fog” due to alcohol intake from the party which is why she couldn’t “remember” damn near anything.
Tory is said to have typed in one of his apologies that he barely remembered the night beforehand because of how “drunk” he was.
EJ testified that Megan and Kelsey were six or seven bottles of alcohol deep BEFORE Tory showed up and because of excessive liquor intake Megan was being hella annoying.
I don’t think there’s any records stating that their alcohol levels were tested that night. If they WERE you’d think that would have been made public by now because either the defense or prosecution would perhaps want to know who was more inebriated
One thing i’d REALLY like to know is if any of Meg’s DNA was on the gun or GSR was on Megan that night. She WASN’T tested (another botched decision from law enforcement) and Kelly said he witnessed Tory, the Driver, AND Kelsey beating on Megan before putting her in the car….
Interesting implications there with that….
Dallas' 4 Eva
Superstar
This is the exact same conclusion I came to as well. Tory at the end of the day has no motive at all to shoot Meg, which is why this always seemed strange to me. It's very obvious Kelsey is the one who shot at Meg, Tory dumbass should have just let them hoes fight.
KingsOfKings
🍩 Donuts 🍩
posted up in here this morning for updates
bourgeoisie tall freak
Superstar
it doesn't matter if it's his gun or not. what matters is whether he was carrying it, and that it was unregistered. read the statutes he was charged with to figure out what matters.
"A weapon is carried if it moves with you, or if you have it in your possession. Having a knife hidden in your pocket, for example, constitutes carrying a weapon because whenever you move, the weapon moves with you. But movement isn't required: Under the law, if you were asleep with a knife in your pocket, you'd still be carrying it. Even when the weapon isn't physically in your possession (held, pocketed, or worn), it's considered "carried" if it's within easy reach or control. So, a weapon hidden under a car seat is considered carried if it's available for immediate use by someone in the car."
Carrying a Concealed Weapon
Learn about concealed weapon carry laws—who can carry a concealed weapon, where, and how? And the penalties for violating these laws.
www.criminaldefenselawyer.com
Last edited:
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
Tory had 10 mill ig followers before the Meg sh-t ever happened. That's far from a "nobody" he had almost as many followers as Durant and Giannis to name some celebs
The friend shot Meg
He shot in the air to break it up.
Her dumb drunk ass probably didn't even realize she was shot until it was over.
She didn't want to put her friend in prison over a drunk spat.
They turned on him after he called them both dumb bytches. This was fueled by her being exposed for having sex with a short man.
Then the witch coven formed and they said.
I got your bytch n1gga.
I got your bytch
Let's see who's a bytch, in Prison.
Last edited:
Keep_It_Hip_Hop_Fam
All Star
He didn't testify that he saw Tory fire in her direction. This Yahoo article is putting a spin on the testimony to fit the narrative.
It is possible Meg was following behind her when Kelsey went to the vehicle to retrieve the gun. She may have been retreating when she saw Kelsey with the gun in hand.
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
10 mill ig followers was a "nobody" ? u are a WOAT.. so try to have an internal debate before u reply..
Keep_It_Hip_Hop_Fam
All Star
it doesn't matter if it's his gun or not. what matters is whether he was carrying it, and that it was unregistered. read the statutes he was charged with to figure out what matters.
"A weapon is carried if it moves with you, or if you have it in your possession. Having a knife hidden in your pocket, for example, constitutes carrying a weapon because whenever you move, the weapon moves with you. But movement isn't required: Under the law, if you were asleep with a knife in your pocket, you'd still be carrying it. Even when the weapon isn't physically in your possession (held, pocketed, or worn), it's considered "carried" if it's within easy reach or control. So, a weapon hidden under a car seat is considered carried if it's available for immediate use by someone in the car."
Carrying a Concealed Weapon
Learn about concealed weapon carry laws—who can carry a concealed weapon, where, and how? And the penalties for violating these laws.
Yeah that's cool and all. But basic logic would be the more likely person who had possession of the gun would be the one who knew exactly where the gun was and who went to the car to retrieve it. It is illogical after a shooting to return the gun to Kelsey after she fired with intent to injure/kill. Tory doesn't even have DNA on the magazine. I can't see the jury proving beyond a reasonable doubt possession is his given the circumstances.
Even the stylist's testimony makes it questionable possession would be Tory's as it's known those girls walked around with protection.
Last edited:
If that’s the case all of them would be charged for carrying, but it’s not though. In all the examples listed, the weapon is owned by the person. He literally snatched someone else’s weapon, that’s not considered carrying. The other person was carrying & he snatched it. It’s definitely negligent shooting thoughit doesn't matter if it's his gun or not. what matters is whether he was carrying it, and that it was unregistered. read the statutes he was charged with to figure out what matters.
"A weapon is carried if it moves with you, or if you have it in your possession. Having a knife hidden in your pocket, for example, constitutes carrying a weapon because whenever you move, the weapon moves with you. But movement isn't required: Under the law, if you were asleep with a knife in your pocket, you'd still be carrying it. Even when the weapon isn't physically in your possession (held, pocketed, or worn), it's considered "carried" if it's within easy reach or control. So, a weapon hidden under a car seat is considered carried if it's available for immediate use by someone in the car."
Carrying a Concealed Weapon
Learn about concealed weapon carry laws—who can carry a concealed weapon, where, and how? And the penalties for violating these laws.
bourgeoisie tall freak
Superstar
the examples say nothing about "owner" because that not what matters lol. you can have something in your pocket and not be the "owner" of it. you can have something in your car seat and not be the "owner" of it, you can hold something and not be the "owner". what matters here is that they are "carrying" it, and it list examples of carrying, not owning. the thing about the law is that the definitions are very specific, you can't just throw words in there that don't matter, that's not how legal reasoning works.
and the cops and DA choose who to charge. they charged him because that's what the facts indicated to them. i'm just posting the law and the facts that happened. yall are free to your opinions tho
as is the jury!
Last edited:
