In court the narratives don’t matter. He was charged with assault, and hasn’t even retired make any claims it was a mistake. No reason for the Jury to randomly assume his intentions without evidence to such.I get that if they just hit him with say reckless endangerment and took deportation off the table we wouldn't be here now.
The narrative that Meg's team is pushing is that "for no reason" Tori shot at Meg and only because of poor aim she wasn't badly hurt (except that she was badly hurt for sympethy's sake)
Kelsey said he did it. Then said she don’t remember.You're good.
You're so f'n good.
There is no proof he did it intentionally either moron, the DA hasn’t proved a motive for Tory at all.In court the narratives don’t matter. He was charged with assault, and hasn’t even retired make any claims it was a mistake. No reason for the Jury to randomly assume his intentions without evidence to such.
The experts can’t even determine if his DNA is definitively on the gun, it wasn’t on the magazine and the same witness said he believes the first shot came from the girl who confirmed has gsr on her hands.Kelsey said he did it. Then said she don’t remember.
Gun powder on tory’s hands.
Independent eye witness says tory shot the gun 5 times.
Doctor says she was shot in the foot.
Tory was found on the scene.
You tell me. What came out in court that definitively contradicts megs account?
You realize Kelsey can lie too, right?Kelsey said he did it. Then said she don’t remember.
Gun powder on tory’s hands.
Independent eye witness says tory shot the gun 5 times.
Doctor says she was shot in the foot.
Tory was found on the scene.
You tell me. What came out in court that definitively contradicts megs account?
Wtf is about to happenInteresting Akademiks is saying Quan is actually the prosecutions witness.
I think he’s wrong because the DA rested their case already
There is no proof he did it intentionally either moron, the DA hasn’t proved a motive for Tory at all.
He said he saw her shooting into the car (no damage on the car and only 5 shots recorded), and that was around the same time the little guy got out. Yall can read the article with the quotes. The prosecutor brought in a DNA expert too and they said it doesn't have to be female DNA and explained how it was possible his DNA didn't transfer, there was actually 90% male DNA on the gun itself. The results were inconclusive on the gun not definite that his DNA wasn't on there.The experts can’t even determine if his DNA is definitively on the gun, it wasn’t on the magazine and the same witness said he believes the first shot came from the girl who confirmed has gsr on her hands.
Bruh if he did it he needs to sit but I ain’t heard shyt that makes this case crystal clear as to who shot her
Ak said the prosecution are the ones who found the driver.
Tory won’t even stand and defend himself in court,You realize Kelsey can lie too, right?
When tory was arrested police recorded him saying "I was trying to protect my girl"
i.e. Kelsey was about to SELENA Meg.
At this point anything could happenthat would make sense. he's on tape saying that tory and the girl were fighting over the gun when it went off. which is charge #3
apparently team tory thinks he's about to get up there and change his story though. sounds like another "play the tape back" moment incoming.
That's what they don't understand, no one cares whats happening outside of court.Tory won’t stand and defend himself in court,
jury dgaf about Akademics tweets