Honestly, Kelsey’s original testimony matches up with everything the best and is the only one without numerous contradictions.Kinda supports Kelsey version of events when she first spoke to investigators
Harris described her own position as being outside the car but still behind her passenger door, in very close proximity to the gunfire
But yea the number of shots isnt adding up
Not one said that was definitely, the defense DNA expert said he'd expect it to be (what he's suppose to say).Still doesn't add up with what the other guy said Friday(?) about Tory's DNA not being on the gun.
If he actually shot 4-5 times, it'd be on the weapon definitively.
The one from SeptemberHonestly, Kelsey’s original testimony matches up with everything the best and is the only one without numerous contradictions.
The defense lying as much as everyone else but let Tory defenders tell it Meg the only one
I'm at yall writing fan fiction to explain how things played out in your head.
So far we have gone from:
Also regarding the payments of a million dollar that both women admit he tried to do. Also the fact that he is paying the lawyer fees for Kelsey.
- "Meg you didn't get shot it was glass on your foot" to...
- "Tory never shot the gun" to...
- "Tory shot the gun to stop an attempted murder"
Man. There are some shytty witnesses all around but this thread is irritating AF watching these mental gymnastics
What's Tory's motive for shooting Meg?from tory never had the gun in his hand to tory was actually acting saving meg . the whole defense was basically tory never even held the gun and now we know he was firing shots too.
Tory gets the shooting in the air for the reckless discharging of a firearm. I think the jury is willing to believe tory had the gun at some point and shot those bullets.but, for who
You can't even prove who did the original shooting.
Thats the problem.
your arguing bytchmade ass just confirmed what you quoted and because you can't help but push this innocent victim shyt, you didn't even realize you didn't add anything to the convo. You just HAD to retort because it wasn't you who said the same thing.Not one said that was definitely, the defense DNA expert said he'd expect it to be.
Still doesn't add up with what the other guy said Friday(?) about Tory's DNA not being on the gun.
If he actually shot 4-5 times, it'd be on the weapon definitively.
even if they trust that white man, this female fighting is just too much to ignore.Tory gets the shooting in the air for the reckless discharging of a firearm. I think the jury is willing to believe tory had the gun at some point and shot those bullets.
I don't think they are fully convinced that tory shot meg, atleast not all of them. As far as possession goes, it's unclear who brought the gun, I don't know if they said tory owns it.
But I do they willing to give him the reckless discharging
His story makes the most sense.
The girls start fight in the car, driver stops, they keep fighting, Big Steppa draws the gun cuz she’s losing, Tory and the driver try to get it off her then ‘flash’, hits Meg, Tory gets it off, more flash goes everywhere. Witness sees Tory with the gun after all that
In a state of rage, they handle Big Steppa and get in the car quickly.
I don’t even think they realised Meg got hit until the police stopped them, that’s how intoxicated they were
Idk what you're trying to say, but whine and cokk suck some more.your arguing bytchmade ass just confirmed what you quoted and because you can't help but push this innocent victim shyt, you didn't even realize you didn't add anything to the convo. You just HAD to retort because it wasn't you who said the same thing.
Just a useless account you are.
Right, but wouldn't it be conclusive if he shot that shyt 4-5 times?Tory’s dna was not found on the gun magazine. His dna on the gun itself is inconclusive, meaning it cannot be proven that his dna is or isn’t on the gun.
Right, but wouldn't it be conclusive if he shot that shyt 4-5 times?
The bodyguard threatened Tory on live though, waving a gun and everythingHe's a bodyguard, not a hired goon. What's he supposed to do after the fact? Risk his freedom?
Ain't his fault Meg chose to go out without security that night, he wasn't on duty.
You can’t tell me what I’m attracted to. You don’t know meThis is cap, you would lose attraction