The official ‘Tory Lanez vs Megan Thee Stallion’ trial thread.

MicIsGod

MicIsGod

They like what that mean
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
20,324
Reputation
1,073
Daps
40,239
Reppin
Atl
cauliflower said:
Firearm expert explains how the trigger being pulled couldn't have been an accident

www.insider.com

Firearms expert testifies that the gun prosecutors say was used to shoot Megan Thee Stallion must have been fired on purpose

An LAPD firearms examiner said the gun found at the scene requires 8.5 pounds of force to fire. Tory Lanez has denied shooting Megan Thee Stallion.
www.insider.com www.insider.com
Click to expand...
Both dna guys said if he shot 5 times they would expect it to be conclusive. 2/2. Explain meech.
 
K

Keep_It_Hip_Hop_Fam

All Star
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
3,246
Reputation
800
Daps
12,012
Reppin
NULL
cauliflower said:
:snoop:She quoted what "megan said" about being kicked out on the stand, Kelsey didn't hear that herself. Unless kylie say's confirms she did, that can't be proven.


She already established why multiple times and said it again in her testimony.


Said why in her testimony on the stand for all juror's to hear.


They never fought. Never once in her story did she say her and Kelsey fought, they argued. There are in real time texts alluding to tory beating her up, judge allowed them to bring in this evidence of text.




1,000th time this same witness sean kelly said he observed the muzzle flash but couldn't specifically determine who was shooting the gun. Contradicted himself several times and even said he seen 2 men beating 1 woman.

Read pages 63, 78, 79 to see exactly what i'm talking about.



You're basically saying the jury is stupid, I'd take it personal if i were them fr.
Click to expand...


It doesn't matter her explanations for her lies. The fact is that each lie undermines her credibility.

I don't need to re-read the document

He simply mentioned an observation of a muzzle flash occuring closer to the female. A logical deduction will be made from that observation.

A physical altercation occured. This is what Kelsey referred to as a 'bump' between her and Meg, but she doesn't want to elaborate

Excerpt from Billboard article:

Sean Kelly, whom the police interviewed shortly after the shooting because the SUV carrying Megan, Lanez, Harris and Smith had stopped near his house. Mgdesyan said Kelly saw Harris exit from the back seat of the car and open Megan’s front passenger door before witnessing “a fist fight between the girls” and seeing one of the women point a gun at the other.

www.billboard.com

Megan Thee Stallion’s Ex-Assistant Contradicts Earlier Statements, Invokes Fifth Amendment During Day 3 of Tory Lanez Trial

Megan Thee Stallion's former friend and assistant Kelsey Harris testified Wednesday (Dec. 14) in the Tory Lanez trial.
www.billboard.com www.billboard.com


Why would two physically stronger men need to beat a female? What would be in that female's possession to give that female an advantage over those two men?
 
MeachTheMonster

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Hall of Shame
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,033
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,807
Reppin
Tha Land
dr. pill biden said:
if that was the case, every man accused of rape by a woman would be found guilty and that’s just not how it goes 99% of the time. as fukked up as it sounds, being in an altered state of mind with disproven credibility works against the alleged victims all the time and dudes walk every day
Click to expand...
Men that get off of Rape charges usually have some exonerating info or lack of evidence elsewhere.

Like the “victim” admitting to lying about the assault, or an alibi, or lack of physical evidence of an assault even happening.

They have clear physical evidence of an assault. They have a positive ID from the victim. They have placed the accused at the scene, and proven he was at least close to the gun when it went off.

This isn’t like those rape cases where it’s just one persons word vs another.
 
cauliflower

cauliflower

Pro
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
631
Reputation
-36
Daps
980
Keep_It_Hip_Hop_Fam said:
It doesn't matter her explanations for her lies. The fact is that each lie undermines her credibility.

I don't need to re-read the document

He simply mentioned an observation of a muzzle flash occuring closer to the female. A logical deduction will be made from that observation.

A physical altercation occured. This is what Kelsey referred to as a 'bump' between her and Meg, but she doesn't want to elaborate

Excerpt from Billboard article:

Sean Kelly, whom the police interviewed shortly after the shooting because the SUV carrying Megan, Lanez, Harris and Smith had stopped near his house. Mgdesyan said Kelly saw Ha rris exit from the back seat of the car and open Megan’s front passenger door before witnessing “a fist fight between the girls” and seeing one of the women point a gun at the other.

www.billboard.com

Megan Thee Stallion’s Ex-Assistant Contradicts Earlier Statements, Invokes Fifth Amendment During Day 3 of Tory Lanez Trial

Megan Thee Stallion's former friend and assistant Kelsey Harris testified Wednesday (Dec. 14) in the Tory Lanez trial.
www.billboard.com www.billboard.com


Why would two physically stronger men need to beat a female? What would be in that female's possession to give that female an advantage over those two men?
Click to expand...
It does matter the explanation she gave, people who were at the court hearing said her testimony was very powerful, emotional, and strong.

If you read that transcript once you wouldn't have repeated your point twice :palm:

 
leoc

leoc

All Star
Bushed
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Messages
814
Reputation
75
Daps
2,764
MeachTheMonster said:
As always you just gotta read.

https://www.court-martial-ucmj.com/dna-is-touch-or-transfer-dna-reliable-evidence-of-guilt/#:~:text=The%20accused’s%20DNA%20could%20have%20gotten%20on%20her,challenge%20the%20admissibility%20and%20reliability%20of%20such%20evidence.



A person doesn’t even have to touch a weapon to leave trace DNA. And just because a person does touch something it doesn’t automatically mean their DNA will be traceable.

The DNA on that weapon didn’t even have to come from immediately before the shooting. Who knows who handled that gun in the days-weeks leading up to testing.
Click to expand...

Does this account for handling time? I’m assuming touching the gun for a second or two would leave behind less traces of DNA compared to holding the gun, and going further, holding the gun and letting off 5 shots.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top