Essential The Official Photography Thread

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
58,234
Reputation
5,496
Daps
137,316
That wedding was last month. I’ve learned a lot of lessons since then. My sigma 19mm let me down but the 35mm and the flashpoint zoom li-on battery saved the day for the most part.
:damn:
You shot the whole thing with just those 2 focal lengths?
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
248,138
Reputation
30,718
Daps
758,382
Reppin
Top 4
That wedding was last month. I’ve learned a lot of lessons since then. My sigma 19mm let me down but the 35mm and the flashpoint zoom li-on battery saved the day for the most part.

there is a reason why the 35mm / 85mm is the combo of many wedding photographers :mjlit:
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
58,234
Reputation
5,496
Daps
137,316
I keep going back and forth with my next camera purchase
:snoop:

Was set on getting a cinema camera (FX6) and dug into the shyt heavy, but now the A1 is creeping into my head due to the future proofing with the 8K and better image quality. I'm getting more into docu-style professional work and have a project that a friend is working on that wants me to DP so the FX6 checks the boxes. She wants to pitch it to the different streaming platforms and the all have camera requirements etc.

The old me would have got the A7Siii or FX3 and called it a day since they all have the same image quality basically, I'm essentially paying almost double the price for the internal ND filter that the FX6 has :smh:
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
40,228
Reputation
-36,117
Daps
227,185
For someone in the market for a cinema camera how do you decide between a Red, Canon c70, FX6, and black magic? I watched a lot of videos and all them cameras put out top notch quality.

Seems like it’s so many affordable great options right now.
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
58,234
Reputation
5,496
Daps
137,316
For someone in the market for a cinema camera how do you decide between a Red, Canon c70, FX6, and black magic? I watched a lot of videos and all them cameras put out top notch quality.

Seems like it’s so many affordable great options right now.
I think Sony fukked up with the pricing for the FX6 because while it's a great price for a cinema camera, when the output is so close to their mirrorless options, it's a tougher sell for me at least. I'm leaning towards the FX6 instead of those others, because I'm already in the Sony ecosystem and will be able to use my glass on multiple cameras without an adaptor.

I looked into the Black Magic pocket cams, and they start off cheaper than the others, but you have to buy a lot of gear to build them up and by the time you do all that, the price is close to some of the other options.
 

shutterguy

Photographer
Supporter
Joined
Nov 21, 2012
Messages
13,159
Reputation
4,965
Daps
40,094
Reppin
Cleveland
DJI_0037.jpg


DJI_0039.jpg


DJI_0040.jpg


DJI_0046.jpg


DJI_0796.jpg


DJI_0800.jpg
 

FruitOfTheVale

Superstar
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
6,445
Reputation
4,138
Daps
17,691
I think Sony fukked up with the pricing for the FX6 because while it's a great price for a cinema camera, when the output is so close to their mirrorless options, it's a tougher sell for me at least. I'm leaning towards the FX6 instead of those others, because I'm already in the Sony ecosystem and will be able to use my glass on multiple cameras without an adaptor.

I looked into the Black Magic pocket cams, and they start off cheaper than the others, but you have to buy a lot of gear to build them up and by the time you do all that, the price is close to some of the other options.

The FX6 is priced to compete with the Canon C300 MKiii, it serves a pretty different audience from the A1 and etc.

The main appeal of the FX6 is that it's lightweight for the type of camera body it is (broadcast/cinema), has a color rendition similar to Arri Alexa and auto ND functionality which makes it great for run and gun in addition to Sony's best of class autofocus and low-light performance. One of the only real downsides of the camera has to do with the shape, which I'll get to later.

The main appeal of the blackmagic pocket cameras are that they offer internal 12-bit RAW, great color science, huge & sharp displays w/ great UI & menus, Dual ISO sensors that allow for clean low-light shooting (the low native iso retains more highlight detail while the high native iso retains more shadow detail), decent sound recording options (a mini XLR input and useable internal mics) and they come bundled with DaVinci Resolve Studio included. Unlike the FX6 they specifically target filmmakers and are not designed for broadcast functionality, the Ursa Mini Pro is Blackmagic's broadcast camera option. One of the biggest downsides is the battery life, which they somewhat rectified in the updated Pro model of the 6K. Without rigging it out with a v-mount battery in a shoulder-rig style configuration, you'd have a hard time running this camera in a wedding scenario without needing at least 5 spare batteries and being able to recharge them. A smaller downside is that the RAW isn't quite 444 RAW so highlight recovery is not the camera's strong suit.

The RED Komodo is a brain-type camera body which is designed to be rigged out to the operator's specific need, it's extremely customizable but also extremely expensive to piece together all of the kit you'll need for any particular setup. Some of the advantages of the RED are that it has a global shutter which is a feature you typically only find in $10,000+ cinema cameras, it basically means that you get virtually zero rolling shutter at all. It has RED's color science and RAW which is pretty much industry standard for commercial sets, not as common in narrative sets (Arri Alexa dominates that) but it's a nice picture regardless with robust highlight recovery in post. However, the low-light performance is nowhere near as robust as what you would get with an FX6 nor a Blackmagic, which makes the camera mainly suited for shoots you're going to light well. This is not a camera you bring to a wedding shoot or event shoot and expect to get usable shots in low-light conditions. You also have to re-black balance the sensor pretty much every time you use the camera to avoid introducing added moire and other noise, and you have to allow the camera to get up to temperature for the picture quality to be as intended. It's not a camera you simply turn on and start rolling.

None of the above are cheap to rig out... the FX6 has a hidden cost of requiring a pretty hefty gimbal to run it effectively due to the long length of the body. It's not designed for Ronin-S style gimbals, correctly balancing the tilt axis is next to impossible on those types of pistol grip gimbals. You'll need a steady-rig or a very expensive gimbal (i.e. Ronin 2, ~$8,000) to effectively stabilize it on all of the axis.

And yes, I've used all of these cameras in the field (and own a BMPCC4K) so I definitely know what I'm talking about in regards to the pluses and minuses.
 
Last edited:

BonafideDefacto

The Coli's Jetsetter & Globetrotter
Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
5,829
Reputation
915
Daps
13,310
Reppin
The Bay
I've had my z6 for almost 2 years now, and considering how much I travel and how I love taking photos; it's a travesty that my shutter count was under 20 about a month ago. I bought a new laptop and made myself a promise that I'd get out and shoot on my free time if I'm rested and that I'd bring my camera equipment with me when I travel

I spent 2 nights in the city (San Francisco) a few weeks back. Had time at night to do some shooting. Looking forward to learning more and expanding my skills



DSC_0001.JPG





DSC_0004.JPG






DSC_0023.JPG





DSC_0045.jpg
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
40,228
Reputation
-36,117
Daps
227,185
I've had my z6 for almost 2 years now, and considering how much I travel and how I love taking photos; it's a travesty that my shutter count was under 20 about a month ago. I bought a new laptop and made myself a promise that I'd get out and shoot on my free time if I'm rested and that I'd bring my camera equipment with me when I travel

I spent 2 nights in the city (San Francisco) a few weeks back. Had time at night to do some shooting. Looking forward to learning more and expanding my skills



DSC_0001.JPG





DSC_0004.JPG






DSC_0023.JPG





DSC_0045.jpg


What lens
 

BonafideDefacto

The Coli's Jetsetter & Globetrotter
Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
5,829
Reputation
915
Daps
13,310
Reppin
The Bay
What lens

Still in the infancy stages of learning how to manually shoot night photography. Sad thing is I didn't even pull out my 24mm f/1.4 during any of these shots. I'm going to reshoot them all along with more when the fog clears in SF in the winter

Photo #1 Nikon 24-70 f/4
F/4 12800iso 1/15 shutter @30mm focal

Photo #2 Nikon 24-70 f/4
F/4 11400iso 1/60 shutter @45mm focal

Photo #3 Nikon 24-70 f/4
F/2 12800iso 1/60 shutter @24mm focal

Photo #4 Nikon 50mm 1.8 G
F/16 900iso 15sec shutter
 

BonafideDefacto

The Coli's Jetsetter & Globetrotter
Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
5,829
Reputation
915
Daps
13,310
Reppin
The Bay
Was in Paris & Amsterdam last month. Since I was there with some scoundrel colleagues that drink a lot, I didn't trust myself bringing my camera and being out wasted with it. So I shot these with my galaxy s21


Amsterdam

20210725_211049.jpg



Paris
20210723_213005-EFFECTS.jpg
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
58,234
Reputation
5,496
Daps
137,316
The FX6 is priced to compete with the Canon C300 MKiii, it serves a pretty different audience from the A1 and etc.

The main appeal of the FX6 is that it's lightweight for the type of camera body it is (broadcast/cinema), has a color rendition similar to Arri Alexa and auto ND functionality which makes it great for run and gun in addition to Sony's best of class autofocus and low-light performance. One of the only real downsides of the camera has to do with the shape, which I'll get to later.

The main appeal of the blackmagic pocket cameras are that they offer internal 12-bit RAW, great color science, huge & sharp displays w/ great UI & menus, Dual ISO sensors that allow for clean low-light shooting (the low native iso retains more highlight detail while the high native iso retains more shadow detail), decent sound recording options (a mini XLR input and useable internal mics) and they come bundled with DaVinci Resolve Studio included. Unlike the FX6 they specifically target filmmakers and are not designed for broadcast functionality, the Ursa Mini Pro is Blackmagic's broadcast camera option. One of the biggest downsides is the battery life, which they somewhat rectified in the updated Pro model of the 6K. Without rigging it out with a v-mount battery in a shoulder-rig style configuration, you'd have a hard time running this camera in a wedding scenario without needing at least 5 spare batteries and being able to recharge them. A smaller downside is that the RAW isn't quite 444 RAW so highlight recovery is not the camera's strong suit.

The RED Komodo is a brain-type camera body which is designed to be rigged out to the operator's specific need, it's extremely customizable but also extremely expensive to piece together all of the kit you'll need for any particular setup. Some of the advantages of the RED are that it has a global shutter which is a feature you typically only find in $10,000+ cinema cameras, it basically means that you get virtually zero rolling shutter at all. It has RED's color science and RAW which is pretty much industry standard for commercial sets, not as common in narrative sets (Arri Alexa dominates that) but it's a nice picture regardless with robust highlight recovery in post. However, the low-light performance is nowhere near as robust as what you would get with an FX6 nor a Blackmagic, which makes the camera mainly suited for shoots you're going to light well. This is not a camera you bring to a wedding shoot or event shoot and expect to get usable shots in low-light conditions. You also have to re-black balance the sensor pretty much every time you use the camera to avoid introducing added moire and other noise, and you have to allow the camera to get up to temperature for the picture quality to be as intended. It's not a camera you simply turn on and start rolling.

None of the above are cheap to rig out... the FX6 has a hidden cost of requiring a pretty hefty gimbal to run it effectively due to the long length of the body. It's not designed for Ronin-S style gimbals, correctly balancing the tilt axis is next to impossible on those types of pistol grip gimbals. You'll need a steady-rig or a very expensive gimbal (i.e. Ronin 2, ~$8,000) to effectively stabilize it on all of the axis.

And yes, I've used all of these cameras in the field (and own a BMPCC4K) so I definitely know what I'm talking about in regards to the pluses and minuses.
Great post. I have a Moza Air 2 and I was already thinking that if I did cop the FX6 that I would end up using a mirrorless camera for gimbal shots.

FX6 would be for everything else. I stacked enough to get it, but now I'm just thinking to myself like... Do I really want to go all in and push myself harder into that lane? That's a question I have to answer
 
Top