Essential The Official Photography Thread

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
62,860
Reputation
13,515
Daps
258,630
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
51271663132_59fe50a9d4_c_d.jpg
51272409806_e3de2ac3c6_c_d.jpg
51273439720_be7ba2ab6f_c_d.jpg
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
35,409
Reputation
7,644
Daps
98,263
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
I know this is borderline disrespectful, but can you do a rundown of how you get to this result.. I mean I take pics all over the world. Sony a7iii, glass cost me about $800.. Taking portraits to long range.. They never come out with this PROFESSIONAL look. Almost like film. Like when you film something and then look at a movie. Yea it's the same lengths and areas, but that movie looks PROFESSIONAL.. These pics look like out of a magazine..


Are you bringing the lighting and lighting this special? Is this all manual shooting? Is it the settings? Is it all in the edits? Lightroom vs Photoshop. Masks vs brushes.. Are you taking 10 mins to edit each photo or 90 minutes?


This is fukking AMAZING. And no matter how many master classes I watch on how to shoot something, it's always looking like some regular ass pics to me. These look like they came out of Vogue
 

FruitOfTheVale

Superstar
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
6,445
Reputation
4,138
Daps
17,691
I know this is borderline disrespectful, but can you do a rundown of how you get to this result.. I mean I take pics all over the world. Sony a7iii, glass cost me about $800.. Taking portraits to long range.. They never come out with this PROFESSIONAL look. Almost like film. Like when you film something and then look at a movie. Yea it's the same lengths and areas, but that movie looks PROFESSIONAL.. These pics look like out of a magazine..


Are you bringing the lighting and lighting this special? Is this all manual shooting? Is it the settings? Is it all in the edits? Lightroom vs Photoshop. Masks vs brushes.. Are you taking 10 mins to edit each photo or 90 minutes?


This is fukking AMAZING. And no matter how many master classes I watch on how to shoot something, it's always looking like some regular ass pics to me. These look like they came out of Vogue

A lot of it is lighting, some of it is the glass, and some of it is the editing. It's also color contrast, something as simple as picking a color for your subject that contrasts/complements the background can make them pop from the photo a lot more.

Beyond that, it's technique and patience to line up and tweak the shot until you're actually happy with the result.
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
35,409
Reputation
7,644
Daps
98,263
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
A lot of it is lighting, some of it is the glass, and some of it is the editing. It's also color contrast, something as simple as picking a color for your subject that contrasts/complements the background can make them pop from the photo a lot more.

Beyond that, it's technique and patience to line up and tweak the shot until you're actually happy with the result.
I been bullshytting long enough... I'm going to start posting and getting some criticism. We have some greatness on the coli and I respect y'all talent for real.
 

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
62,860
Reputation
13,515
Daps
258,630
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
I know this is borderline disrespectful, but can you do a rundown of how you get to this result.. I mean I take pics all over the world. Sony a7iii, glass cost me about $800.. Taking portraits to long range.. They never come out with this PROFESSIONAL look. Almost like film. Like when you film something and then look at a movie. Yea it's the same lengths and areas, but that movie looks PROFESSIONAL.. These pics look like out of a magazine..


Are you bringing the lighting and lighting this special? Is this all manual shooting? Is it the settings? Is it all in the edits? Lightroom vs Photoshop. Masks vs brushes.. Are you taking 10 mins to edit each photo or 90 minutes?


This is fukking AMAZING. And no matter how many master classes I watch on how to shoot something, it's always looking like some regular ass pics to me. These look like they came out of Vogue
lots and lots of practice. definitely not 90 minutes. I know there are some super high in commercial retouchers that literally do a damn retouch down on the pixel level and spend hours. but nah not even close to 90 minutes. some are using lighting. the ones in the stairwell are natural light.
 
Last edited:

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
248,136
Reputation
30,718
Daps
758,377
Reppin
Top 4
I know this is borderline disrespectful, but can you do a rundown of how you get to this result.. I mean I take pics all over the world. Sony a7iii, glass cost me about $800.. Taking portraits to long range.. They never come out with this PROFESSIONAL look. Almost like film. Like when you film something and then look at a movie. Yea it's the same lengths and areas, but that movie looks PROFESSIONAL.. These pics look like out of a magazine..


Are you bringing the lighting and lighting this special? Is this all manual shooting? Is it the settings? Is it all in the edits? Lightroom vs Photoshop. Masks vs brushes.. Are you taking 10 mins to edit each photo or 90 minutes?


This is fukking AMAZING. And no matter how many master classes I watch on how to shoot something, it's always looking like some regular ass pics to me. These look like they came out of Vogue

Dude is like Wayne Gretzky out here
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
248,136
Reputation
30,718
Daps
758,377
Reppin
Top 4
I'm a traveler and I own a clothing line based on traveling. I'm going to try not and make these look like promotions. But thats what most of my pics consist of. Here's DC 2020















Edit: @Pressure how do you post the big pics like you did from flickr



dope
I also do your style try and get a daytime/nightime shot of the same thing.
 
Top