Essential The Official Photography Thread

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
59,571
Reputation
5,730
Daps
140,261
sony just announced the A7R4. 61 MP sensor.

rip harddrive space. :mjlol:
Breh, I legit opened up Youtube just now and see Jason Vong had a livestream with a hands-on with it... I legit went
:mjtf:

Sony been trolling hard with how long they making us wait for that A7SIII release. That shyt better be absolutely flames and crush buildings on the video side. I'm straight with my A7III for images, I can't even imagine sifting through those files for the R4

:picard:
 

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
64,677
Reputation
13,835
Daps
263,820
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
Breh, I legit opened up Youtube just now and see Jason Vong had a livestream with a hands-on with it... I legit went
:mjtf:

Sony been trolling hard with how long they making us wait for that A7SIII release. That shyt better be absolutely flames and crush buildings on the video side. I'm straight with my A7III for images, I can't even imagine sifting through those files for the R4

:picard:
and watch some of these youtubers immediately get it, claim they needed it, then 6 months later "why i switched back to the A7iii" video. :martin:
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
59,571
Reputation
5,730
Daps
140,261
and watch some of these youtubers immediately get it, claim they needed it, then 6 months later "why i switched back to the A7iii" video. :martin:
I'd need to upgrade my laptop to just review the RAW files at a decent speed
:deadmanny:

My Macbook already be chugging along with these A7iii RAW files, just a rough estimate, but with a 61MPs the file for 1 RAW image is probably close to 140-150mbs

:wow:

I just shot an Anniversary Dinner that was basically a Wedding Reception, I'm just thinking about how much longer my workflow would be with files damn near triple the size that I use now. Mogs going to be out here shooting digital like it's film because they not going to want to have to cull through all their images like that with these big ass sensor readouts.

I read that you still get 26MPs when you shoot in APS-C mode on this joint... cotdayum
:whew:
 

BlackXCL

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
3,862
Reputation
401
Daps
14,130
Reppin
t.
yo fukk it all.. i might actually need that R4.

the details

:wow:

saw some dude post a handheld shot of a bee at 100% crop its basically a macro shot, completely ridiculous :wow:
 

Towlie

All Star
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
1,814
Reputation
420
Daps
3,531
Reppin
NULL
So I have a beginners camera. Nikon d5600

I shoot weddings, and by next summer I want to upgrade

I'm seeing a lot of people using the gh5 or gh5s. Also the Sony a7iii

Are there any more I should be on the lookout for? That's not like 4 thousand??
 

Objection

All Star
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
3,349
Reputation
684
Daps
11,567
Reppin
Louisiana
So I have a beginners camera. Nikon d5600

I shoot weddings, and by next summer I want to upgrade

I'm seeing a lot of people using the gh5 or gh5s. Also the Sony a7iii

Are there any more I should be on the lookout for? That's not like 4 thousand??
If you're already shooting with Nikon and have several lenses why not look into the D500. It's a crop sensor lens like the D5600 but they market it as a professional camera. I've seen it online for about $1,500 with the kit lens. But if you're going full frame then I hear that the a7iii is pretty good mirrorless and it's the way of the future.
 

Towlie

All Star
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
1,814
Reputation
420
Daps
3,531
Reppin
NULL
If you're already shooting with Nikon and have several lenses why not look into the D500. It's a crop sensor lens like the D5600 but they market it as a professional camera. I've seen it online for about $1,500 with the kit lens. But if you're going full frame then I hear that the a7iii is pretty good mirrorless and it's the way of the future.

preciate it, I actually rent a d500 right now for weddings, a lot of this video was shot on a d500



I only have a 17-50mm sigma and a 50mm prime so starting over with lenses wouldnt be a huge deal. I was just trying to figure out the creme of the crop for videography

I do like the d500 though
 

BlackXCL

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
3,862
Reputation
401
Daps
14,130
Reppin
t.
After months of debating whether to switch to Sony i've decided to stay with Nikon.

Too much invested in lenses, flash transmitters, speedlights, etc to just switch over.

Going with a used (mint condition) Z6, selling my D610 and 24-70 and just gonna buy a sigma 85 1.4 and keep all my other lenses.

Sony was tempting but makes too little sense.

Sony was the sexy side piece down to fukk in the work office and keep it all a secret :wow:... but I have a good woman at home :wow:
 

Majestyx

Duck Season
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
17,095
Reputation
2,495
Daps
39,566
Reppin
Los Scandalous
After months of debating whether to switch to Sony i've decided to stay with Nikon.

Too much invested in lenses, flash transmitters, speedlights, etc to just switch over.

Going with a used (mint condition) Z6, selling my D610 and 24-70 and just gonna buy a sigma 85 1.4 and keep all my other lenses.

Sony was tempting but makes too little sense.

Sony was the sexy side piece down to fukk in the work office and keep it all a secret :wow:... but I have a good woman at home :wow:
a7's feel funny in the hand after being a nikon shooter. aparently the new ass sony they just dropped feels better tho. the Z6 is dope. and the new eye AF in it seems like its useable. you just saved yaself a few thousand dollars
 

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
64,677
Reputation
13,835
Daps
263,820
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
I can never catch these type of errors. :mjcry:


Amazon Accidentally Sold $13,000+ Camera Gear for $100 on Prime Day

amazoncrazydealfeattt-800x420.jpg



Amazon discounted a wide range of camera gear for Prime Day this week, but some photographers scored what may be the best deals of their lives. Thanks to a pricing error, many people were able to purchase high-end camera gear bundles, some worth over $5,000, for just around $100.

It all started when someone noticed that the $550 Sony a6000 and 16-50mm lens bundle was being listed at just $94.50 on Amazon, and the person shared the “deal” on Slickdeals, where it hit the front page.

slickdealsscreen-800x427.jpg


Many users were able to see the same price and place orders, while other users reported still seeing the normal price of $550. And it wasn’t 3rd-party sellers that the $94.50 price applied to — the gear was being sold and shipped by Amazon.

But then people noticed that other cameras and bundles were also being sold for $94.50, and that’s when the real frenzy started.

“Literally everything is $94.48,” one member
writes. “I have bought like 10k worth of stuff that was like 900 dollars total.”

“I got a $13,000 lens for $94,” another member
writes regarding their Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS order. “LOL waiting for the cancellation but thats like 99.3% off.”


Other members spoke to Amazon customer service about their order and were told that the order would indeed ship. Others also reported that they successfully price matched gear at retailers such as Best Buy and Walmart.

Fuji Rumors reports that photographer Cody McGee managed to buy the $1,299 Fujifilm X100F for $94.48.

fujiorder-800x697.jpg


Shortly after placing the order, McGee was notified that the camera had been handed over to UPS already.

A Slickdeals member named Steeve ordered the $2,000 Canon EOS R for $94.48 and also soon received confirmation that it was on the way:

shipped.jpg


While many Slickdeals members remarked that the orders would almost certainly be canceled by Amazon, the retail giant does have a history of honoring some pricing errors — even those that are significant.


And in this case, photographers have already begun receiving their $94.48 orders.

One photographer PetaPixel spoke to saw the Slickdeals post and ordered two Sony a6000 kits for $94.48 each before he saw that the same price applied to other cameras. So he then purchased a $2,000 Sony a6500 and 10-18mm bundle for $94.48, and then a $2,000 Sony a7 body for $94.48, and then a $5,500 Sony a9 and 24-70mm f/2.8 GM bundle for $94.48.

The a7III and 10-18mm just arrived at his house yesterday, a day after he placed the order.


christmasearly.jpg


“I’m sure other people may have scored a better deal than I did since Amazon locked me out of my account thinking someone had hacked it, buying all these high-end cameras,” the photographer tells PetaPixel. “I had another a9 in my cart, the Nikon Z6, and a Canon EOS R totaling $300, but they shut it down before I could finish checking out.”

While orders placed on backordered products may presumably still be canceled and refunded, anything already handed over to shipping companies seems guaranteed to arrive at the price paid. Many Slickdeals members have already received the gear they ordered with fingers crossed.

The forum thread at Slickdeals attracted over 250,000 views and over 1,300 comments before the deal was marked as expired. It’s now filled with both great celebration by those who received the gear and great remorse by those who missed out.


“After years of lurking around on [Slickdeals], I made an account today just to post this very comment to state my depression of missing this deal,” one member says. “I will now go back to my corner and attempt to live vicariously through everyone else’s purchase wins.”

Another member writes: “This is probably the best deal I’ve ever seen anyone on [Slickdeals] get for a single item.”
 
Top