Essential The Official Photography Thread

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
64,786
Reputation
13,855
Daps
264,103
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
Better than Nikon's showing for sure
:huhldup:
yeah i see why Nikon rushed their shyt out. Canon's camera seems like a better effort. They got eye-AF and the Canon adapter is only $100. I think Nikon's adapter was like $250 alone or $150 with the camera. :mjlol:
 

Citi Trends

aka milobased
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
13,456
Reputation
7,145
Daps
89,068
Reppin
C.I.T.I

Majestyx

Duck Season
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
17,112
Reputation
2,496
Daps
39,614
Reppin
Los Scandalous
Better than Nikon's showing for sure
:huhldup:
nah... the nikon camera body is better than the canon. nikon video is better also. canon got the cute lil screen and better lenses.

the 4k in canon is cropped and crippled. they both lost. fuji and sony still>>>>>(edit) when it comes to mirroless.

if i didnt kinda need silent shooting, I'd go cop an old dslr. a fukkin d810 is going for 1500 now. :damn:
 
Last edited:

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
59,623
Reputation
5,730
Daps
140,430
nah... the nikon camera body is better than the canon. nikon video is better also. canon got the cute lil screen and better lenses.

the 4k in canon is cropped and crippled. they both lost. fuji and sony still>>>>>(edit) when it comes to mirroless.

if i didnt kinda need silent shooting, I'd go cop an old dslr. a fukkin d810 is going for 1500 now. :damn:

No Eye AF on the Nikon either
 
Top