The official opinions from Sony, Ubisoft, WB, BN, Apple, Riot, Google and more about the Activision Blizzard acquisition

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
68,376
Reputation
3,643
Daps
106,962
Reppin
Tha Land
I'm talking about this, "Nope, it’s not same thing. What sony did is worse. Spend millions to take content off the other console. Make it so the other console and the publisher can’t even acknowledge the game is on their system." Wouldn't that still require an agreement with the publisher to do such a thing? I'm just trying to figure out what Sony actually did.
They paid activision and plenty of others to pretend their games weren’t even coming to xbox.

Per the contract Microsoft or the publishers were not even allowed to say the game would be on xbox until after release.
 

Gizmo_Duck

blathering blatherskite!
Joined
Aug 15, 2018
Messages
72,155
Reputation
5,369
Daps
152,854
Reppin
Duckburg, NY
They paid activision and plenty of others to pretend their games weren’t even coming to xbox.

Per the contract Microsoft or the publishers were not even allowed to say the game would be on xbox until after release.

Like microsoft just did with scarlet nexus
 

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
48,898
Reputation
12,785
Daps
127,286
It 100% is true

Been through multiple acquisitions in my industry


The only way “out” is the other party has to agree. And in those cases the money makes it worth it. Cheaper to just ride out pre existing deals and let ‘em expire.

Case in point, look at the X-men movie properties. The Fox movie actors are still contractually obligated to play those those roles until 2025. Marvel waiting to recast until that deal is up.

Even college football, those teams switching conferences are doing it after their current contact tv deals expire.

Lol at thinkin you can Willy nilly break contracts with no repercussions :dead:
I should be more clear, im saying MS has enough FU money to make it happen in some form.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
146,888
Reputation
26,312
Daps
492,606
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
I should be more clear, im saying MS has enough FU money to make it happen in some form.

I mean if I paid 50 million for the rights and contract and MS offers me 150 mill to agree to break it. :skip:


What would be hilarious is if they extend the deal. :laff:

Brains would be

CommonSpectacularAndeancondor-size_restricted.gif
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
68,376
Reputation
3,643
Daps
106,962
Reppin
Tha Land
I mean if I paid 50 million for the rights and contract and MS offers me 150 mill to agree to break it. :skip:


What would be hilarious is if they extend the deal. :laff:

Brains would be

CommonSpectacularAndeancondor-size_restricted.gif
Chump change :win:

They probably will keep taking Sony money. As long as the game is on Gamepass it will market itself on xbox.
 

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
48,898
Reputation
12,785
Daps
127,286
Yeah MS isn't really worried about COD being MP as of now.
Maybe when PS has actual competition they do the "now choose" thing but that its years in the future. For the foreseeable console generation I think COD and things like OW and other IPs are all MP games because why miss out on free money?

Gamepass will pull over people who want to "play it for free" and the die hard PS fans can pay 70... for it.
 

Gizmo_Duck

blathering blatherskite!
Joined
Aug 15, 2018
Messages
72,155
Reputation
5,369
Daps
152,854
Reppin
Duckburg, NY
Yeah MS isn't really worried about COD being MP as of now.
Maybe when PS has actual competition they do the "now choose" thing but that its years in the future. For the foreseeable console generation I think COD and things like OW and other IPs are all MP games because why miss out on free money?

Gamepass will pull over people who want to "play it for free" and the die hard PS fans can pay 70... for it.

Kinda wack that MS will be pricing their games at 70 dollars. Seems anti-consumer
 

CoolinInTheCut

Superstar
Joined
Mar 17, 2022
Messages
6,225
Reputation
1,210
Daps
14,004
Respawn are still probably the best shooter dev in the industry despite EA’s management

Not really. Apex has a lot of issues that get overlooked cause it's not exclusive to one console. Respawn also lost a lot of developers, and Vince is now head of BF.

They just went over a whole season where the game was randomly unplayable on Xbox due to input lag.
 

Gizmo_Duck

blathering blatherskite!
Joined
Aug 15, 2018
Messages
72,155
Reputation
5,369
Daps
152,854
Reppin
Duckburg, NY
Not really. Apex has a lot of issues that get overlooked cause it's not exclusive to one console. Respawn also lost a lot of developers, and Vince is now head of BF.

They just went over a whole season where the game was randomly unplayable on Xbox due to input lag.

What do you think of Deviation? They seem to have a pretty big FPS vet staff

 

CoolinInTheCut

Superstar
Joined
Mar 17, 2022
Messages
6,225
Reputation
1,210
Daps
14,004
This is just incorrect. Not even sure what else to say, you are just wrong here.

TLOU has the same shyt. The movement and gameplay is the same.

Elder scrolls and fallout have very different enemies types, Fallout has base building mechanics, etc.

For whatever reason you are pretending all the difference between ES and Fallout don’t exist, while also exaggerating the differences between TLOU and uncharted. :smh:

Movement and gameplay are not the same between TLOU and Uncharted whatsoever.

Movement and gameplay between Elder Scrolls and Fallout are exactly the same tho.
 
Top