That's a completely irrelevant distinction in this case because the anti-genocide protestors you have been chastising are either members of a diasporic community or have a moral belief in the value of human life that extends beyond national borders. I'm trying to brute force some moral philosophy and logical rationale into your thinking by forcing you to put yourself in the shoes of the people you have been criticizing.
Careful brother, you're sounding like a MAGA leftist tankie now
It's clear to you in this hypothetical because instead of someone else in the line of fire it's you and your family. You say Trump would be better than Kamala for Black Americans because even though Trump is still a racist piece of shyt who says racist things, Kamala was part of an administration that was
actively aiding and abetting the murder of tens of thousands of black Americans, and refused to take a different course when she became the nominee. Actions speak louder than words, and the active crisis takes precedence over someone arguing that Trump
maybe could perhaps do worse if he were to win.
Now ask yourself if your hyperventilating at Pro-Palestinian voters was judicious, especially given that many of them showed even more grace to the Harris campaign than you're willing to show in this hypothetical by conceding that it's not clear Trump would be better on this issue than Kamala.
I'm starting to think you're being purposefully obtuse to evade the obvious conclusion of this hypothetical. Because this has little to do with the point. But to answer, let's say the Biden administration and Harris campaign's budget had a large increase in funding and authorization for transfer of lethal military equipment to local police who are working in tandem with paramilitary forces to commit these targeted mass killings of black Americans.
