It's more than tactics. Couple things we have to remind ourselves. Outside of the last Euros, England have consistently underachieved.
This isn't the first golden generation.
They have had home grown and international coaches.
What is causing England to underachieve?
Other major countries have down years but the come back, Spain, Germany, France, Italy all pop back up.
England keeps underachieving.
The talent is there, the EPL allows them to nuture talent against the best in the world.
I posit that there is an issue endemic to English football, that we are missing, that causing them to be this way. Something is not right there mentally or politically.
I don't know what it is, bit it's there and the team won't be fixed until that problem is fixed.
It's the mentality and tactics on how you go into games. England/Britain don't have a positive aggressive mentality in the sporting world. Its a country/Nation of losers. Oh never mind youngave it your best shot. Here's an OBE or a Knighthood for losing.
Theres a lack of clarity and intent with the tactics. That's why the best coaches in Rugby and Cricket whove changed things mentality wise have have previous experience outside of the country. With the Rugby Eddie Jones changed things but his personality wore everyone down. But prior to that between the years winning world cup under Clive Woodward. Who himself spent 5 years playing Rugby in Australia. It was all standard English rugby that goes back years. The kicking territorial game. Instead of being more attacking passing and running Rugby. The most exotic thing English rugby use to do was take people from Rugby League.
England cricket team best coaches have been 2 Cac Zimbabweans an Australian and now a Kiwi. All wanted the team to be aggressive and positive in what they were going to do. The English coaches have had muddled thinking and change things on the whim instead of clarity of the way they want to play I.e the tactics. England's best captains in the 21st century have all been born outside of England/UK
Now back to the coaches.
Sven was cautious and didnt want to rock the boat. And was too influenced by English football instead of adapting from his European experiences.
Capello understood it all but the players didn't really grasp what he was telling them.
McClaren was too matey with the players.
Woy been playing the same way since the 80's but he too fell into the trap of trying to get all the best players not the best team.
Waistcoat get it but he doesn't have the coaching nous to execute the plans properly and his too cautious. Also relies too much on vibes.
Keegan was a vibes man our best players will outscored your best players.
Hoddle understood it all but ego got in the way between his comments on disabled. Ellien Drewery and showing the players up in training.
Venables also understood but his dodgy past phucked that up.
Graham Taylor was a terrorist long ball merchant.
Bobby Robson was a vibes man.
Out of those names only 2 of them are known for playing possession football. Venables and Hoddle who also had experience outside of England. Hoddle also had Wenger as a mentor. Venables toured when on a pilgrimage to Holland back in the mid 70's.
You can name Spain Germany Italy and France they all have a style of play that goes back decades. Spain always been about keeping the ball. Germany while blending their traditional physical style with now a more possession one over the past 14 years also have the mentality. Italy are known terrorists whose football been that way for decades.
France has always been a combination of flair and physical but comes down to if everyone is in harmony with one another.
What is England's style of play? What style would suit England's players characteristics over the years. It's all been for the majority of time been defensive cautious approach. Instead of trying to use what the English league is all about power and pace take it to the opposition. You should be able to try and blitz team away.
You fix it for starters by binning the League Cup and make the PL 18 teams.