that wasn't the point at all.
as one of the few people (i guess) who really enjoyed heroes in crisis, it's really disappointing to see so many fans paint broad strokes over the narrative because a writer did something to a character that they dont approve of.
the irony there, is that king speaks DIRECTLY to this issue as part of the narrative within the book.
so many heroes were so hung up on what wally's return meant to them, no one really bothered to question what he was dealing with losing his most cherished loved ones in the process. wally was hope. rebirth. that's all he was to them, because of how he made THEM feel. but how many asked him how it felt to lose his wife and his kids?
how many writers (save for the buildup to HiC in Flash) before king actually tried to tackle what that might do to a person's pysche?
conversely, so many fans are so stuck on what wally means to them as a character, what he "stands for". they refuse to acknowledge that all of us have the potential to have everything we aspire to be undone by a bad decision, or in this case a mistake tied to mental health issues. any single person, faced with issues they can't deal with on their own, has the potential to become someone unrecognizable to those who care about them. that's why mental health is such a serious issue! in wally's case, it doesn't make him a monster. it just means he needs help.
it also means the true mark of his character will shine through in whatever way he bounces back from this.
look at all the people he's surrounded by at the end. each of them has made horrible decisions (some without repent) in their own right, and each has found redemption. shyt, booster gold damn-near wrote batman out of continuity less than a year ago, and he's one of the biggest heroes in this book. wally will bounce back, because that's what heroes do. hopefully, it will come as a result of a writer willing to help him heal from what happened in HiC, as opposed to just retconning his mistakes away.
is the series perfect? fukk no. in hindsight i think framing it as a murder mystery was disingenuous. i dont think clay mann was the right artist for a series with such serious tones (too much beefcake). and i also think this would have functioned much better in a graphic novel format; one of the biggest issues imo is that we kept waiting for cliffhangers to be un-hangered each month, and it just wasnt that kind of story.
there are other execution issues as well. that said, i really appreciate what king did here. as someone who hated when marvel wrote out spidey's marriage, who can still pick apart 100 things wrong with how they did it, i know in hindsight it was justified by three words: superior spider-man.
if someone is willing to tackle and continue the conversation king has started here, i think this can be further justified in the long run too,