@Cole Cash
aight breh..my views on Haymon and PBC
I don't see Haymon as some savior for boxing mostly because of how the fighters he "advises" are compensated in contrast to what they have actually done in the careers. Alot of his fighters are overpaid for fighting the most non descript opponents and passing them off as must see cards.
He all but turned boxing on showtime into shyt with this matchmaking practice last year. shyt was disgusting to me esp since i pay for the channel. I also think that shyt ruins fighters, especially young and/or upcoming fighters. It breeds laziness and complacency along with tendency for risk aversion. I also can give 2 shyts on what fighters make as an excuse for this. Hell its already starting to rear its head in some of his main fighters already and I think its going to get worse.
PBC is the culmination of Al's efforts to preserve his fighters from taking Ls. Now I thought PBC's intent, besides trying to showcase boxing on more mainstream level, was showing a better quality of fights. Especially with that roster he has under his control. i don't feel that way at all. I'm not the people that are nitpicking the design, or the broadcasting team, or the entrances for PBC and dismissing it off that. That type of shyt is trivial and cosmetic in the bigger picture of things. What is important though is it matchmaking. I don't feel the cards are any different from your FNF, Shobox, HBO BAD, regular Showtime card. It has its fights here and there and I do have a PBC fight as the current leading FOTY candidate (Huck-Glowacki - ironically neither are PBC fighters lol). However it is the one thing I harp about PBC. The potential for good cards are there but its not being executed right.
Now I hear the typical response "Pat its on free TV though ". That shouldn't be any reason to excuse the matchmaking. I also feel because there's so many PBC cards these days, it is used as a crutch. For example the 3 undercard fights on the past Floyd-Berto card shytted on every PBC card i've seen, which is all of them. That was on a PPV and that is the type of level of fights i thought PBC was going to bring to the game. Now with all that I've seen every PBC card on TV and have even been to one live with plans on seeing another one live next month. I do it because I love boxing..nothing more nothing less.
If im going to drink the PBC kool aid, the matchmaking has to improve and even better work with other promoters
so thats basically a sum of my thoughts..most of the cats on here have heard them before in different variations
Pat you my nikka but that was just a post of nonsensical thots
You're a fan of the sport so why care bout boxers purses when they're fighting on basic cable or channels you can get for free with a digital antenna
They're not fighting on PPV. They're not fighting on premium cable that you have to pay an extra $20 for, so again why care bout their purses
At one point you complain bout PBC's matchmaking when most of the 50-50 fights this year have been on PBC
There has literally been no upsets on hbo and only one on Showtime. On PBC there has been at least 6 upsets and close call after close call
The most nonsensical part is when you compare the undercard of a $75 PPV to a PBC card on regular TV
It's like you really expect Salido/Martinez and Jack/Groves to be on Fox Sports 1 card
That said PBC did put on a card as great as that Mayweather undercard (Warren/Payano, Cota/Johnson) but you ain't mention it
You complaining bout PBC not doing something that no one else is doing
Showtime and hbo ain't shown boxing in damn months
Showtime did and hbo is putting on a PPV where someone in the main event is a massive underdog that noone believes will win
But you complaining bout PBC putting on a big fight every month instead of every week
Also Glowacki been signed to Haymon since April Pat