All the boxing heads and Coli brehs that praised Haymon because thought it would create more exciting fights more often are being proven wrong. Looks like he's just protecting his investment and keeping guys, especially Broner and Danny, safe to build fights up. Why shouldn't we get Danny/Postol or Danny/Peterson II?
As for Danny, it looks bad and there's no denying that. GGG has wiped his division clean aside from the lineal champ that's ducking him, so that's a bad example.
Danny has made 1 title defense, owes 2 guys a rematch, doesn't try to make weight, has at least 1 other guy, Postol, that deserves a title shot, and a few others in line for it. Also, If he takes Paulie, will have taken 2 soft touches outside of his division. He doesn't sound like a guy that you can let slide or give props for taking a stay busy fight. He's just hanging out in dannyweight limbo, waiting for others to clear the way and for Floyd to abdicate the throne.
Beating Paulie only serves to prove what he already proved by beating Morales and Zab. It's useless because he's not even a hard hitting 147, IF they even fight at 147, and Paulie is coming off a brutal KO loss at 147. The worst part is that I don't think Danny is scared. He's just trusting Haymon's plan, even if it makes him look suspect in the meantime.
We fighting Shawn Porter breh...I think "protecting" is not what I'd call that matchup