InvictusAeternusEternus
In the cut
Im trying to figure out how some of those scores add up.
116-113, 116-114, 117-112,117-113
116-113, 116-114, 117-112,117-113

A clear example of nikkas giving Maidana rounds just cause......Im trying to figure out how some of those scores add up.
116-113, 116-114, 117-112,117-113![]()
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.
Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.
Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning.![]()
guess he likes being invited over to the big boy mansion to be around the fastest cars and the baddest bytches![]()
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.
Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.
Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning.![]()
You know they cant see the fight well over rhe commentators voicesthey have to rewatch on mute
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.
Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.
Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning.![]()
Does Takashi have a fight coming up ? My Japanese is very limited and I wont even pretend to be able to read kanji![]()
The only problem with doing that is most people are drunk, high or some combo of both and are distracted by the people watching with them.
If your bias, your bias! Your gonna lean towards your guy or against the guy you dislike no matter if you watch it once or 100 times.
I scored Bradley Pac 7-5 watching it live and 7-5 watching it again for the second and third time. I was almost completely sober watching it live so there was no drastic change in how I viewed the fight. Most of the fight's that I watch on ppv though, im usually blasted and got a chick in my lap just like the Floyd fight. I had it 8-4 live but Im now leaning towards 9-3 after Ive watched it sober and without outside distractions.
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.
Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.
Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning.![]()
The only problem with doing that is most people are drunk, high or some combo of both and are distracted by the people watching with them.
If your bias, your bias! Your gonna lean towards your guy or against the guy you dislike no matter if you watch it once or 100 times.
I scored Bradley Pac 7-5 watching it live and 7-5 watching it again for the second and third time. I was almost completely sober watching it live so there was no real change in how I viewed the fight. Most of the fight's that I watch on ppv though, im usually blasted and got a chick in my lap just like the Floyd fight. I had it 8-4 live but Im now leaning towards 9-3 after Ive watched it sober and without outside distractions.
I guess the WBO was drunk tooWBO president Francisco "Paco" Valcarcel, whose organization sanctioned the title match, said he would have five judges review the video of the bout. On Wednesday, the results of that review were released. The five judges, whom Valcarcel said are accomplished judges with world title experience -- but whose names were not disclosed -- scored the fight for Pacquiao, 118-110, 117-111, 117-111, 116-112 and 115-113.
Even then you can still be bias, if there is a close round. you can give it to a certain fighter.
I guess the WBO was drunk too