Essential The Official Boxing Random Thoughts Thread...All boxing heads ENTER.

LauderdaleBoss

#TunnelGang #RingGangRadio
Staff member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
18,516
Reputation
5,283
Daps
57,536
Reppin
Lauderdale
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.

Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.

Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning. :mjlol:
 

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,373
Reputation
733
Daps
21,434
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.

Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.

Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning. :mjlol:

You know they cant see the fight well over rhe commentators voices :skip: they have to rewatch on mute
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,635
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.

Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.

Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning. :mjlol:

Exactly.


I watched this fight on my 50 inch LG Tru Motion 1080p HDTV.............so I aint miss nothing:heh:


I scored that fight 115-113 and 44 of the 91 members of the media had Mayweather winning 7 rounds to 5....just like I did.


Only 4 out of 91 members of the media who had Mayweather winning scored it 9 rounds to 3:sas2:


If anyone on here scored it like that, or even higher, then maybe THEY need to re-evaluate what they are watching in a boxing match:manny:
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,503
Reputation
530
Daps
7,584
Reppin
The Sweet Science
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.

Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.

Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning. :mjlol:


The only problem with doing that is most people are drunk, high or some combo of both and are distracted by the people watching with them.

If your bias, your bias! Your gonna lean towards your guy or against the guy you dislike no matter if you watch it once or 100 times.


I scored Bradley Pac 7-5 watching it live and 7-5 watching it again for the second and third time. I was almost completely sober watching it live so there was no real change in how I viewed the fight. Most of the fight's that I watch on ppv though, im usually blasted and got a chick in my lap just like the Floyd fight. I had it 8-4 live but Im now leaning towards 9-3 after Ive watched it sober and without outside distractions.
 

LauderdaleBoss

#TunnelGang #RingGangRadio
Staff member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
18,516
Reputation
5,283
Daps
57,536
Reppin
Lauderdale
The only problem with doing that is most people are drunk, high or some combo of both and are distracted by the people watching with them.

If your bias, your bias! Your gonna lean towards your guy or against the guy you dislike no matter if you watch it once or 100 times.


I scored Bradley Pac 7-5 watching it live and 7-5 watching it again for the second and third time. I was almost completely sober watching it live so there was no drastic change in how I viewed the fight. Most of the fight's that I watch on ppv though, im usually blasted and got a chick in my lap just like the Floyd fight. I had it 8-4 live but Im now leaning towards 9-3 after Ive watched it sober and without outside distractions.

I had Mayweather winning 7 rds to 5. It was a close competitive fight. A draw wasn't some type of reach either. Chino needed to land more telling blows to really say he won or that it was a robbery. Nobody is really saying that so I think the right man won. I don't care to see a rematch either.

I understand what you saying about the bias, but it's more of a factor for most people upon additional viewings. You just in the minority breh.

No matter how drunk/high I am I can still objectively watch and score a fight. I've been watching boxing far too long for weed and alcohol to become stronger than my judgement when scoring fights, but that's me though. :manny:
 

Big Boss

Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
179,537
Reputation
13,256
Daps
351,461
Reppin
NULL
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.

Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.

Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning. :mjlol:


Even then you can still be bias, if there is a close round. you can give it to a certain fighter.
 

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,373
Reputation
733
Daps
21,434
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
The only problem with doing that is most people are drunk, high or some combo of both and are distracted by the people watching with them.

If your bias, your bias! Your gonna lean towards your guy or against the guy you dislike no matter if you watch it once or 100 times.


I scored Bradley Pac 7-5 watching it live and 7-5 watching it again for the second and third time. I was almost completely sober watching it live so there was no real change in how I viewed the fight. Most of the fight's that I watch on ppv though, im usually blasted and got a chick in my lap just like the Floyd fight. I had it 8-4 live but Im now leaning towards 9-3 after Ive watched it sober and without outside distractions.

WBO president Francisco "Paco" Valcarcel, whose organization sanctioned the title match, said he would have five judges review the video of the bout. On Wednesday, the results of that review were released. The five judges, whom Valcarcel said are accomplished judges with world title experience -- but whose names were not disclosed -- scored the fight for Pacquiao, 118-110, 117-111, 117-111, 116-112 and 115-113.
I guess the WBO was drunk too
 

LauderdaleBoss

#TunnelGang #RingGangRadio
Staff member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
18,516
Reputation
5,283
Daps
57,536
Reppin
Lauderdale
Even then you can still be bias, if there is a close round. you can give it to a certain fighter.

True, but like I said in my above post, it's usually more of a factor upon repeated viewings for most people.

I think nikkas really wanted this shyt to be a shut out win for Floyd so bad, that they're coming up with all types of bullshyt reasons to not give Maidana any rounds or at least admit that the fight was competitive.
 
Top