InvictusAeternusEternus
In the cut
Im trying to figure out how some of those scores add up.
116-113, 116-114, 117-112,117-113
116-113, 116-114, 117-112,117-113
Essential The Official Boxing Random Thoughts Thread...All boxing heads ENTER.
- Thread starter Jesus Is Lord
- Start date
A clear example of nikkas giving Maidana rounds just cause......Im trying to figure out how some of those scores add up.
116-113, 116-114, 117-112,117-113
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.
Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.
Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning.
Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.
Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning.
Black_Jesus
Superstar
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.
Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.
Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning.
You know they cant see the fight well over rhe commentators voices
they have to rewatch on mute
guess he likes being invited over to the big boy mansion to be around the fastest cars and the baddest bytches
The only one who can get exclusive interviews from TBE
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.
Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.
Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning.
Exactly.
I watched this fight on my 50 inch LG Tru Motion 1080p HDTV.............so I aint miss nothing
I scored that fight 115-113 and 44 of the 91 members of the media had Mayweather winning 7 rounds to 5....just like I did.
Only 4 out of 91 members of the media who had Mayweather winning scored it 9 rounds to 3
If anyone on here scored it like that, or even higher, then maybe THEY need to re-evaluate what they are watching in a boxing match
You know they cant see the fight well over rhe commentators voices
don't forget slow motion.
InvictusAeternusEternus
In the cut
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.
Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.
Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning.
The only problem with doing that is most people are drunk, high or some combo of both and are distracted by the people watching with them.
If your bias, your bias! Your gonna lean towards your guy or against the guy you dislike no matter if you watch it once or 100 times.
I scored Bradley Pac 7-5 watching it live and 7-5 watching it again for the second and third time. I was almost completely sober watching it live so there was no real change in how I viewed the fight. Most of the fight's that I watch on ppv though, im usually blasted and got a chick in my lap just like the Floyd fight. I had it 8-4 live but Im now leaning towards 9-3 after Ive watched it sober and without outside distractions.
Amare's Right Hook
Southeast World Champion
Does Takashi have a fight coming up ? My Japanese is very limited and I wont even pretend to be able to read kanji
He is going to be at an event signing autographs
I had Mayweather winning 7 rds to 5. It was a close competitive fight. A draw wasn't some type of reach either. Chino needed to land more telling blows to really say he won or that it was a robbery. Nobody is really saying that so I think the right man won. I don't care to see a rematch either.
I understand what you saying about the bias, but it's more of a factor for most people upon additional viewings. You just in the minority breh.
No matter how drunk/high I am I can still objectively watch and score a fight. I've been watching boxing far too long for weed and alcohol to become stronger than my judgement when scoring fights, but that's me though.
I only really respect the scoring from the first viewing of a fight when everything is fresh and happening at the moment so the air of uncertainty is there before the official scores are read. You're actually forced to make up your mind for each round as it happens.
Most often when nikkas view shyt the 2nd and 3rd times, the bias starts to set in and dudes start giving and taking away credit for shyt that they gave in the first place.
Case in point all the people that had to watch Pac/Bradley1, 3 and 4 times in order to find 6 or more rounds for Bradley in order to somehow justify the robbery that took place. The 1st time nikkas watched it they struggled giving dude 3 or 4 rounds, but when they seen it 5 times later, they somehow got Bradley winning.
Even then you can still be bias, if there is a close round. you can give it to a certain fighter.
Black_Jesus
Superstar
True, but like I said in my above post, it's usually more of a factor upon repeated viewings for most people.
I think nikkas really wanted this shyt to be a shut out win for Floyd so bad, that they're coming up with all types of bullshyt reasons to not give Maidana any rounds or at least admit that the fight was competitive.