Recipe for disaster.yeah im very skeptical on this move...dana spent so much time bashing boxing and now he wants in and got turki to bankroll...and im no fan of nick khan either
Recipe for disaster.yeah im very skeptical on this move...dana spent so much time bashing boxing and now he wants in and got turki to bankroll...and im no fan of nick khan either
60% of it from Canelo sanctioning fees lol.The WBC only posts revenue of $4 million a year
Maybe Turki should buy them![]()
yup, the Liv golf situation might be the blueprint they use for thisthat's a really good point
ironically this venture might lead to some network actually picking it back up for regular TV
wardley is chinny but he should easily knock pulev the fukk out..hunter will be his biggest challengeWardley finally moving up. Him knocking out Frazier-Clarke got him going places
Hope Turki does some more stateside cards
For all the flaws of boxing, seeing ring girls, having swearing and sometimes late cards is helpful.
A little fukkery keeps boxing, boxing. You ain't acting a fool over there
There's definitely some similarities with their killer instinct but as far as their boxing styles, I'd say Bud is a little more Hagler than Leonard. Hagler doesn't get enough credit for his boxing ability & high IQ because he was a good puncher & could get you outta there
You must not have watched Hagler from the late 70's & the early 80's. You're referring to his style when he left his prime. He was an highly skilled boxer/puncher that knew how to slip counter & get guys out of there.Respect your opinion but imo Bud is more SRL because of adaptability. Hagler really didn’t have game plans. He came to destroy each and every time. Great boxing skills but he only wanted to fight one way, fortunately he was one of the best to ever do it that way.
You must not have watched Hagler from the late 70's & the early 80's. You're referring to his style when he left his prime. He was an highly skilled boxer/puncher that knew how to slip counter & get guys out of there.
I also respect your opinion but I highly suggest you go back to the tape & watch some early Hagler bro
Respect your opinion but imo Bud is more SRL because of adaptability. Hagler really didn’t have game plans. He came to destroy each and every time. Great boxing skills but he only wanted to fight one way, fortunately he was one of the best to ever do it that way.
Excellent post bro & totally agreeHagler was first and foremost a skillful boxer-puncher. He could turn on the pressure when he needed to (Hagler, late rounds of the Mugabi fight), but he was a methodical boxer-puncher most of the time. He had a great jab and accuracy with his combos, and also has solid defensively due to good movement and parrying.
He fought in that manner in what I thought were his peak performances: Hamsho 1 and Sibson.
I thought the Hearns fight was one of the best examples of a guy switching it up from his usual style. He had to bring it to Tommy because Tommy was so hard to outbox at range, and because Tommy’s right hand was most deadly when he got distance and leverage on.