Seems like they are negotiating a deal will Fox and Showtime. If that goes through they will release a schedule for each network like they usually do. Spence vs Crawford would have been the biggest fight announced, so with it not happening it throws the whole schedule off too. Mayweather is fighting on DAZN so maybe they land some fighters there too. Who knows.
Wilder vs Ruiz?
Tank vs Garcia?
Charlo vs Tszyu?
Benavedez vs Plant?
In all seriousness, this is one of the Better takes on this situation I’ve seen online …
J rock gotta get some wins first so you can sell that shyt in some fashiondamn figured PBC was holding him in the tuck to be fed to Spence when he moved up
Why should the PBC want to sign Crawford long term? The only value he really has is that WBO belt. He doesn't have a real fanbase or great ticket sales or PPVs coming with him; hell his highest PPV numbers came in a fight with a PBC fighter(which is why Porter asked for more money). Bob Arum himself said he lost money on all of his fights.It's kind of strange that PBC never made an earnest attempt to woo Crawford away from TR when he resigned last time and now that he's a free agent they still don't seem that pressed to get him under the banner now even though it would likely result in a trilogy with one of their bigger PPV fighters.
Why should the PBC want to sign Crawford long term?
At MAX it would yield around 600k, realistically I expect it to do 4 to 500k. Most of that is gonna be around the fact it's an undisputed fight in a glamour division, not necessarily that it's Terence Crawford. Also I don't think Spence wants a trilogy with him, he has repeatedly said it's either Crawford or 154. I mean I could see why you would sign him to a multi fight deal, I just don't think it would be a smart move business wise long term.He's 35 so I'm not really saying long term per say, but it would result in multiple big PPVs for one of their main guys. Arum was losing money because he had no viable opponents for Crawford
You say he has no value then in the next breath admit that him fighting Spence would yield Spence highest PPV by several 100K sells
They get at minimum two big PPVs then an opportunity to put him up against up and comers like Stanionis /Ennis or move him up to 154
The financial potential for Crawford is totally different at TR vs PBC because of PBC controlling the 147 and 154 divisions and it's why he'd be dumb to just accept any 1 sided deal they throw at him
Most of that is gonna be around the fact it's an undisputed fight in a glamour division, not necessarily that it's Terence Crawford.
Just because it's a debate doesn't change the fact that all the evidence points to the belt being more important than Crawford. Crawford's name and status don't mean much otherwise he'd be bringing more to the table and PBC wouldn't mind signing him long term.yea naw, it was a whole debate about this in one them other threads but Crawford could drop the WBO and if he fought Spence it would still be the biggest PPV of both their careers. He's an undefeated top p4p fighter that would be a betting favorite against Spence, that's what would be driving the career pay days for both. The unification is just icing on top. PBC not being willing to put the money up to make this happen is wild
If PBC doesn't want to sign Crawford long term it sounds like they are actually confident in Spence's ability to take the belt off of him and don't want anything to do with him outside of that otherwise they would have been asking for rematch clauses, to my knowledge Crawford wants rematch clauses. Crawford is selling his belt, not Crawford.
As far as I saw Crawford was the one who wants the multi fight deal and rematch clause, not Spence. Spence has made it very clear he gone whoop that boy and move up, why would he want a rematch clause unless Crawford agrees to take the rematch at 154.Where is it reported that Crawford is the one requesting the rematch clause? It's in PBC best interest to include a rematch clause regardless who wins since it guarantees they don't end up with another Plant situation and they end up making money for both fights anyway. Since they clearly dictating all the other terms I'm assuming they included that as well.
The rematch clause benefits Crawford even if he WINs because it guarantees the winner a better split when without that if Crawford wins it's a possibility Spence could still argue for a higher split in a new negotiation so putting that in place don't mean he selling his belt to me. Just a common sense provision to agree to, especially since it's not some other bigger fight he need to go rush to after he whup Spence ass