I agree, Crawford has always been matched up in favorable situations anyone with any sense can see he aint been in there with another game dog and there are multiple reasons for that, but even then they still have the same number if good wins bro regardless who was favored, and not to mention Crawford was undisputed something Loma was not.
Loma's 135 run has been about as good as Crawford's 147 run.
That shyt is hard to come back fromAxeman was the truth...lomachenko beating him was similar to how he beat rigo...TKO wins and both fighters didnt get no type of damage
Walters should be a problem right now at 130 or 135....be in the mix...its sad to meThat shyt is hard to come back from
So I guess you gon OVERLOOK the fact that he BODIED a still capable Darchiniyan and a future HOF Donaire who still giving P4P nikkas tough fights
Furthermore, I guess you also gon OVERLOOK the fact Walters got ROBBED in that Draw fight.
You trolling now.
Spence is Crawford's Teofimo.
Linares is like the Thurman Bud avoiding now.
Pedraza and Campbell are top 10 dudes who at least were in there primes. Lets say they can translate to Ugas and Porter.
Corrolla equals Khan and Brook
A damn shameironically someone asked Fischer in his mailbag yesterday what happened to Walters. Doug said dude was already pissed at the business of the sport before the Loma fight. I can believe it since dude got robbed in that draw and shortchanged by Bob for the Loma fight.
nikka took his ox tails and went home.
ironically someone asked Fischer in his mailbag yesterday what happened to Walters. Doug said dude was already pissed at the business of the sport before the Loma fight. I can believe it since dude got robbed in that draw and shortchanged by Bob for the Loma fight.
nikka took his ox tails and went home.
He was thrown into the fire.
lol there’s really no comparison in resumes to me and I prefer Crawford a hellavu lot more then I prefer Loma. Nyggas gotta learn how to be objective in these conversations.
Loma only has 16 fights and his resume is pretty much built on quality instead of quantity. There was no development period. He fought for a title in his second fight. Fought Gary Russell in his third fight . Like who does that?
If you’ve been following his career in real time his fights typically make sense. However, we got a lot of fans nowadays that pull up boxrec, see a couple of names, and then say “he only has 2 good wins.” They don’t know anything about the opponents which I get in those lower weight classes.
The whole conversation is just a joke. Crawford has a better resume? Really when over 20 of his first fights, had a lot of guys with losing records? That’s a better resume?
