facts...and erik was coming off prolly beating the best version of manny pacquiao..stylin on him too
and raheem took him to school...like the shyt wasnt even close..it might have been the weight but the way that fight was going i dont think morales would have ever beaten him at his prime weight..they were trying to set up that doubleheader cuz pacquiao was on that card too...which they did but it kinda lost some luster
Morales beat Paquiao so clear the first time, that there was really no need for a rematch. However, it was probably the biggest money out there, so I get it.
Morales/Raheem was terrible matchmaking. Going into the fight, I thought Raheem was going to outpoint him, but that they would give Morales the decision, considering Morales/Pac 2 was next. Well, Zahir beat him so bad, that they couldn't even rob him. I was watching Zahir very closely at the time, so him outboxing Morales wasn't really surprising to me.
If you remember, Morales and Manny fought on the same night. Manny gets an easy tuneup with Velazquez, and they put Morales in there with Raheem? I never understood it. It's not like I thought Zahir was a monster, but I just knew that his style is just all wrong for damn near anybody in general. He only had one clean loss his entire career, which was Funeka. His other two losses were debatables.
I disagree about that being the best version of Manny. Manny had a serious problem against anyone that could box at a high level, at that point in time.