He says about a guy who wasn't really feeling Guardians Of The Galaxy and Ant-Man at all, but don't let that cloud your continued ignorance.
I only shyt on poor film making. Recently outside of Nolan's first two Batman movies DC has a worse rep with that than Marvel.
yes because we formed an emotional attachment to the "characters" having watched the solo movies
and the results were very mixed, quicksilver/scarlet weren't well received and visions characterisation seemed rushed.
would have been x10 better if we saw Affleck established as batman in a solo flick or if bale returned then just slotting him in like this
These movies refuse to be great action films and want to be comediesAlso, this movie could be complete shyt and it will still make a ton of money and even if the reviews are shyt it doesn't necessarily kill the universe because Transformers franchise is evidence against that line of thinking. Each film according to critics and the posters here and I guess whoever you ask gets worse and worse and yet each film makes more money than the last.
As for Doomsday, like I said I never liked the character and I had hoped that he will be easily taken care of so I don't have to see him in future films. With that said, people are discussing weak villains, look no further than the Avengers franchise where the non-skrulls were completely inept and fodder, total job squad status and then look at Ultron whose design was terrible and who cracked jokes completely unlike what the character is like in the comics.
Some people in this thread won't admit that though.
Each other....
The hell they aren't
that's his schtick... this could be facebook 2 and he'd have the same lines, same face, same voice, same everythingI'm liking this Lex. He's on his "I'm young, rich and smart, fukk all of you." Eisenberg comes off as an a$$hole like that in his interviews so if the shoe fits...
got me over here dyingSometimes I think The Dark Knight is the best and worst thing to happen to comic book movies.
All this dark and gritty shyt people keep talking about. That worked because the condensed story Nolan was telling and his realistic approach.
For all the people who saw Man of Steel, it wasn't a damn thing "dark and gritty" about it. They might have went overboard with that damn filter but I wouldn't call it dark/gritty. In this cinematic universe you got damn near gods doing DBZ shyt, a dude in a bat suit, an Amazonian princess, then Aquaman and Flash as well.
Like somebody already pointed out, Synder said there would be moments of levity in the film and there is nothing wrong with that.
People expecting the DC movie films to be all that different from the Marvel films are going to be disappointed. At this point the only difference will be the actors and cinematography.
"but sir this movie isn't even..........." 
other guy has 48% of his face out... and is only the most recognizable playboy in the worldwatching this trailer really showcases how stupid the DC universe can be. guy puts on some glasses and lightly changes his hairstyle, and no one can tell who he is? how does that work?
to be honest... a lot of people were let down by CW trailer too... where nikkas thought there would be MORE characters and fukkery... they kinda got let down on some, this is just an avengers 2.5 with internal beefI love that everything DC does has marvel stans writing dissertations about,finding anything they can to complain to about.
Dudes writing side by side reviews of trailers comparing it to the civil war trailer
Civil war trailer has like 10 different characters dudes are geeked as fukk like
Bvs trailer has like 4-5 characters dudes are like, this is too many characters and too much story,movie has to be 3 hours its going to be convoluted
