Generally and subconsciously the problem that most people have with the "Martha" thing is something that Pixar mentioned in their 22 rules of storytelling.
#19: Coincidences to get characters into trouble are great; coincidences to get them out of it are cheating.
Personally, I don't actually have a problem with it, per se. The one surefire way to get to Batman would be his parents. Nobody understands the loss of a parent or the potential loss of one more than Bruce Wayne. What I DO have a problem is with is how it plays on film. It comes across as pure coincidence and not something with real gravitas, something wholly compelling, something akin to fate. Coincidence that benefits the protagonist by itself in a story is unsettling and jarring to the audience. Most people aren't going to be on some shyt, but more so . A better director would have made it a more palatable scene, but as I've said 251345545 times Zack Snyder is not a talented director in that sense. Maybe in those dream sequences he's awoken and startled at the end of each of them by the voice of his father saying Martha; he has a scene where he's tells Alfred that he's having recurring dreams about him mother of some sort, just a quick mention. He's shown having an emotional reaction to the name Martha. For example, maybe he notices that little girl he saves in beginning has on a necklace or bracelet that says Martha, and reacts solemnly. Basically, that scene really needed to be built up to from the onset of the movie and throughout the entirety pf the movie. You can't have the opening with his father saying Martha and the scene at the mausoleum and be like, "Well, job is done here ."
It's lazy and purely coincidence and that's status.
On another note:
#1: You admire a character for trying more than for their successes.
#13: Give your characters opinions. Passive/malleable might seem likable to you as you write, but it’s poison to the audience.
^^^^^^ Key issues with this portrayal of Superman as I've layed out in some posts on here. Such that, I don't even know who Cavill is supposed to be actually playing like I've said.
#19: Coincidences to get characters into trouble are great; coincidences to get them out of it are cheating.
Personally, I don't actually have a problem with it, per se. The one surefire way to get to Batman would be his parents. Nobody understands the loss of a parent or the potential loss of one more than Bruce Wayne. What I DO have a problem is with is how it plays on film. It comes across as pure coincidence and not something with real gravitas, something wholly compelling, something akin to fate. Coincidence that benefits the protagonist by itself in a story is unsettling and jarring to the audience. Most people aren't going to be on some shyt, but more so . A better director would have made it a more palatable scene, but as I've said 251345545 times Zack Snyder is not a talented director in that sense. Maybe in those dream sequences he's awoken and startled at the end of each of them by the voice of his father saying Martha; he has a scene where he's tells Alfred that he's having recurring dreams about him mother of some sort, just a quick mention. He's shown having an emotional reaction to the name Martha. For example, maybe he notices that little girl he saves in beginning has on a necklace or bracelet that says Martha, and reacts solemnly. Basically, that scene really needed to be built up to from the onset of the movie and throughout the entirety pf the movie. You can't have the opening with his father saying Martha and the scene at the mausoleum and be like, "Well, job is done here ."
It's lazy and purely coincidence and that's status.
On another note:
#1: You admire a character for trying more than for their successes.
#13: Give your characters opinions. Passive/malleable might seem likable to you as you write, but it’s poison to the audience.
^^^^^^ Key issues with this portrayal of Superman as I've layed out in some posts on here. Such that, I don't even know who Cavill is supposed to be actually playing like I've said.