We are losing our 2 corners so he’ll have a good shot.
Oh ok..
Last edited:
We are losing our 2 corners so he’ll have a good shot.
It was better than the B1g this yearEverybody shyts on the PAC... conference was legit
And that's worked out for who exactly?Yep
OU has to win now. Programs are starting to realize this and letting their highly touted qb recruits bounce.
I think it's got its praise pretty early this season with Washington St and Oregon St's hot starts, plus Colorado, USC and UCLA's initial relevance. I think that dwindled with those 5 kinda vomiting on themselves down the stretch, but it's unarguably top 2 this yearEverybody shyts on the PAC... conference was legit
Everybody shyts on the PAC... conference was legit
I already spoke about how it may be better for that caliber of recruit to just develop on the lower levels and come out as a highly touted transfer w/multiple years left and engage in free agency, but from the program perspective, I think if you got the clout, you really want that transfer with a couple years of real experience + a talented, yet not superstar young backup behind him. The ideal ideal would be two good transfer QBs that battle it out in spring + one young dude developing behind both of them, but that's as rare as it gets.Yep
OU has to win now. Programs are starting to realize this and letting their highly touted qb recruits bounce.
If I'm OU, I might have to make a run for Cam Ward.
Yep
OU has to win now. Programs are starting to realize this and letting their highly touted qb recruits bounce.
Again, I'm hardly watching any of these at this point, but this was a huge problem last few years (really almost the entire time we've had the CFP). If they could do something for bowls akin to the November-December invitational matchups in CBB or the in-season tournament with the NBA, that would be HUGE.
hell, or just make them the equivalent of secret scrimmages in CBB, but televised. I still think they'd have more value as August invitationals than they do now as December bowl games. And it's only going to get worse with more playoff games and more interest in protecting one's self for the TP and NFL draft
I already spoke about how it may be better for that caliber of recruit to just develop on the lower levels and come out as a highly touted transfer w/multiple years left and engage in free agency, but from the program perspective, I think if you got the clout, you really want that transfer with a couple years of real experience + a talented, yet not superstar young backup behind him. The ideal ideal would be two good transfer QBs that battle it out in spring + one young dude developing behind both of them, but that's as rare as it gets.
Outside of a select few - UGA, Alabama, FSU - alot of these upper echelon schools don't seem concerned with internal development anymore tbh. It may help the opposing argument that UGA/UAT are in a different tier than anyone else, and have had good or better QB play going into the postseason every year.
Again, I'm hardly watching any of these at this point, but this was a huge problem last few years (really almost the entire time we've had the CFP). If they could do something for bowls akin to the November-December invitational matchups in CBB or the in-season tournament with the NBA, that would be HUGE.
hell, or just make them the equivalent of secret scrimmages in CBB, but televised. I still think they'd have more value as August invitationals than they do now as December bowl games. And it's only going to get worse with more playoff games and more interest in protecting one's self for the TP and NFL draft