The OFFICIAL 2023 College Football RANDOM THOUGHTS Thread

PREDICT the NATIONAL CHAMPION


  • Total voters
    105
  • Poll closed .

Lucky_Lefty

Dreams Are Colder Than Death...
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,865
Reputation
5,779
Daps
116,979
Reppin
Purgatory
- Arkansas looks terrible. The backup looks likes he’s never thrown a pass before

- Drinkiwitz got a fukkin set of teeth on him

- SEC defenses getting stunted on by a white dude from a D2 we never knew existed
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,237
Reputation
-13,974
Daps
130,305
Read back in the thread one page, you poorly-educated dumbass. Way to shoot yourself in the foot yet again.

I already gave you multiple paragraphs about how a whole slew of SEC teams have been overrated this year. Maybe if I went to Alabama, I could "right paragraphs" though.

Is that all "your got"? :russ:

BECAUSE THE RANKINGS ARE fukkED UP IN FAVOR OF THE SEC. THIS IS THE FIFTH TIME YOU'VE USED THE SAME fukkING CIRCULAR ARGUMENT. :laff:


Georgia has 3 ranked wins only because they get to count a win over a 7-4 Tennessee squad that got blown out by Florida.

Washington has been limited to 3 ranked wins only because they don't get to count a win over 7-4 Utah....who just happens to have kicked Florida's ass.



Utah has two wins (UCLA and USC on the road) better than Tennessee's best win, their losses were better than Tennessee's losses, they played a tougher OOC schedule than Tennessee, they played more road games than Tennessee, AND THEY BEAT THE fukk OUT OF THE SAME TEAM TENNESSEE GOT WHUPPED BY.


In reality, UW should have 4 wins over ranked teams, and Georgia should only have 2. TWICE as many. But it gets to be 3 and 3 because of those fukked up overrated SEC teams, which is the whole point.
This post is about UT too

I’m not going back to look at a fukking @Rhakim post
 

AVXL

Laughing at you n*ggaz like “ha ha ha”
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
40,851
Reputation
645
Daps
76,390
Reppin
Of course the ATL
Disingenuous as fukk.


1. 3 members in SEC states, only 1 member in a Pac-12 state. 5 members living in the South right now, just 2 members living in the West right now.

2. 11 members from the two SEC time zones, only 2 members from the two Pac-12 time zones.

And points #3, #4, and #5 were irrelevant to where they live.


You really don't even try, do you?






You're the same person who said Tennessee was a good team and Utah was a bad team....how'd that argument go for you? Do you still believe the committee was completely unbiased when they ranked Tennessee #21 and didn't rank Utah at all?

Have you noticed that EVERY person in this thread who has commented on it besides you has said ranking Tennessee that high was a bunch of bullshyt?

I didn’t say Utah was a bad team…they were *gasp* a good team at one point in the season and because of them losing and not playing good football they aren’t a good team anymore, it’s not because of an agenda to hype up SEC teams at the expense of more deserving CFP teams. But if you seriously think the CFP isn’t armed with the same information as you and yet still choose to vote differently because of “SEC bias” I got a bridge to Birmingham to sell you where you can protest this SEC bias all you want
 
Top