I agree mostly, and I think Lane at TAMU could work, but I think Lane is hoping to get a shot at Alabama when Saban retires or is hoping the Florida job opens up in the near future.
this is fukking comical. You are making the exact argument that he pointed out was full of shyt, which it is. Who had UK played when they had a top 10 defense? That Florida team is not decent
. The Vols don't deserve to be ranked. None of that shyt was justified. I think it's becoming apparent you only pay attention to rankings to judge a team.
Because at least you can point to Clemson having a signature win. I don’t think they should be ranked and only ranked due to FSU needing a T25 W (can say the same for 3-loss LSU being inside the T15; ridiculous). But they have a better win than Tennessee or any of the other midcard SEC squads. Also hung tough with the season long #4 now #5 team in the nation. Their defense is pretty damn good. It’s the offense that’s failed them.It’s weird how some CFB fans constantly bytch and complain about where mid SEC teams are ranked in the polls, folks don’t do this with other conferences7-4 Clemson ranked right now and not a peep.
Tennessee should not be ranked and it's an embarrassment that they are. I do think Missouri at #9 isn't unreasonable, their only two losses were against a potential heisman winning offense with LSU and they played tough against the #1 team who is on a 28 game winning streak and back=to-back national champions. Missouri also has a quality OOC win against K State.
I'm a Florida fan. I think Napier needs to make some off season moves: hire an OC, change up some other staff, hit the portal much harder than he did last season to bring in some talent.
The point that you are missing is some of us are able to recognize when a team isn’t all that good despite their rank. You are basically admitting the only reason UK was ranked was because of their cupcake schedule. Well I can assess that, and determine that hey, this really isn’t a top 20 team, whereas you say they are ranked 20, therefore they are a good team. What’s funny is you are acting like we didn’t try to tell you this earlier in the season but you held steadfast that UK was a good team, now here we are and you still just can’t admit you were wrong. UK was NEVER a good team this season you just caught on to that much slowly than others.
They had 2 SEC victories including destroying a then ranked Florida team. That early in the year most FBS schools have a similar type of schedule where they play a few cupcakes and maybe one or two conference games. You acting like the AP and College Football polls didn’t actually vote them top 20. It wasn’t me breh, it’s people who know a whole lot more about football than you and @Rhakim and @lucky lefty combined who agreed that they were a legitimate team.
And it’s possible for teams to have a disappointing season and still deserve to be ranked (ie the Vols)
But I don’t understand what yall are even arguing…yes UK isn’t good now, that’s been proven but at the time them being a top 20 team made sense. People thought USC was a CFP contender at one point this season but they aren’t even ranked. Opinions of these teams change throughout the season, not sure why that’s so difficult for yall to comprehend
oh ok you so you mean to tell me you recognize good teams better than coaches, administrators and the media who are all paid to watch games every wk. Ok got it
Tennessee beat a weak ass UConn squad and jumped 4 spots. Got its ass blasted by an average of 28.5 pts the last two weeks and still top 25. Oregon State lost by 2 to the #4 team in the country and had a more precipitous drop than the Vols and they’re much better than UK or UTk or anyone else on your schedule not named Mizzou. FOH with this dumb ass logic bruh. Tennessee and Kentucky aren’t good no matter how much you try to sway us they are to boost your schedule.
