Whips-n-Chains
Chi
This song>>>>everything Jay Z has done post American Gangster Soundtrack
The notion of “we send kids to the league” I understand everyone isn’t for the nfl, but if you sending folks and they washing out in 3-4 years, you didn’t really send them, your system hid the fact that they could do one thing really well, i think of vinnie Sunseri dude was def playing good enough in hs to deserve a scholly but he ended up getting drafted and now another notch on Alabamas belt, but in reality he was a smart player that was too slow to really be a db, too little to be a lb but nick disguised him and allowed his intelligence to flourish, and there’s more, not just at Bama, but should we give this notion of they get drafted so freely away ?
I know folks rebuttal is their job is to get them to the league and the rest is on them, well then don’t apply the development tag to these coaches or schools If a lot of their prospects wash out in less than 5 years to me in my humble opinion, you should be able to do both, if you are just getting the biggest and best and make a tweek here and there but the minute they hit the league they fail there was no development you just got them a look
@Sauce Dab
@Silkk
@smitty22
@portcityplaya
@Ed MOTHERfukkING G
@Trust Me
@Trav
@O.iatlhawksfan
@Whips-n-Chains
@RammerJammer
@malbaker86
@invincible1914
@ReturnOfJudah
@Numpsay
@Woodwerkz
@Rigby.
@L. Deezy
So pettyAt some point the nfl teams have to be held accountable. Their scouts need to recognize those players flaws. Position coaches need to coach them up. Those school are gonna utilize those kids talents as it fit best for their team. Once they gone it’s solely on the nfl teams. So using the we put kids in the nfl is absolutely a legitimate argument to get kids to come to said school. Even if a player fizzles out after a couple years like a Denard Robinson for instance.
Didn't know they had it like that
UGA and TENNWhich of these teams will lose Saturday?
OSU
UGA
TENN