The OFFICIAL 2015 College Football RANDOM thoughts thread

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Winning games

Not good enough... .Programs like USC, Alabama, UCLA, etc, has had 5-10 year stretches where their win total/achievements were average... You should know better.....

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Do we really have to have this discussion relative to Ark?

Of course... 75% of the coli has no idea what they fukk they talking about.... so its a responsibility of the upper brass to lend some credibility to this site

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Ed Reed was a 2-star undersized, under recruited kid in a era where those types of kids fell threw the cracks. Today's age the recruiting sites are much better at identifying those kids and ranking them accordingly. So that's not a good example breh.

LSU's uptick started with Kevin Faulk staying instate and grinding for 4 years building that program upwards. Those HS kids saw that and LSU became cool again. By the time Saban got there in '99 their record might not have showed it but the talent was there.

LSU has always been a sleeping giant in CFB because it's the only school that matters in a state full of blue chip HS players. Arky doesn't have that advantage.

This guy gets it.....

 

[Ed MOTHERFUCKING G]

Not good enough... .Programs like USC, Alabama, UCLA, etc, has had 5-10 year stretches where their win total/achievements were average... You should know better.....

Wtf does UCLA have to do with usc or Alabama

Much different tier.

 

[The ADD]

Of course... 75% of the coli has no idea what they fukk they talking about.... so its a responsibility of the upper brass to lend some credibility to this site

Simple answer, consistent winning seasons at or above the 8-4 mark.

 

[RammerJammer]

Nvm

 

[Silkk]

Just realized i haven't seen Holtz or Mark May all season, ESPN threw them boys deep in the bushes

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Wtf does UCLA have to do with usc or Alabama

Much different tier.

Historically... They are a revered athletic program(including B Ball of course)....from an athletic/academic standpoint.... See....TCU, Baylor, Oregon, albeit newly manufactured, are considered powerhouses......

I say that to say that the difference in between good programs and bad programs, is leadership, and how much you're willing to invest....

Notre Dame was irrelevant for over 20 years, but no one would dare say they are a bad program....

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Simple answer, consistent winning seasons at or above the 8-4 mark.

Alabama was barely 500 for about 10 years.......... I could say the same thing for some other money schools as well

 

[Silkk]

Not good enough... .Programs like USC, Alabama, UCLA, etc, has had 5-10 year stretches where their win total/achievements were average... You should know better.....

Ucla? Man fukk ucla

 

[PortCityProphet]

We play that same offense and we land good QB recruits. We just don't kno how to develop them

Bruh I swear LSU been recruiting the same exact cat over and over. Russell Shepard look like jordan Jefferson who resembles Brandon Harris but looks like anthony Jennings. It's gotta be one dude. Cause they all play thr same too

 

[RammerJammer]

Just realized i haven't seen Holtz or Mark May all season, ESPN threw them boys deep in the bushes

For Danny Kanell and Joey Galloway College Football Final is terrible now

 

[The ADD]

Alabama was barely 500 for about 10 years.......... I could say the same thing for some other money schools as well

Well what are we talking about? Good as in historically good or good in a current stretch?

Traditional top programs are going to get a pass for subpar stretches. During those down times I wouldn't have said Bama was a good program at that point. Historically yes.

Relative to Arkansas during our time they just haven't been a consistently good program. Plenty of flashes

 

[Silkk]

For Danny Kanell and Joey Galloway College Football Final is terrible now

Word, shyt is robotic as fukk

No more final verdict

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Well what are we talking about? Good as in historically good or good in a current stretch?

Traditional top programs are going to get a pass for subpar stretches.

Look at the bolded... .Tradition>>> It basically means that a part of that state's culture is committed to that team's success...... That's what makes a good program.......... See, a lot of what you guys are seeing now are politics and capitalism awarding certain schools because of "tradition"

College football is smoke and mirrors man... There is nothing transparent or sportsmanlike about it....