The myth that Bill Russell and Wilt Chamberlain never played against players over 6'5

Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
176,108
Reputation
22,209
Daps
578,176
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Steven Adams 7'0"
Enes Kanter 6'11"
Kevin Durant 6'11"
Serge Ibaka 6'10"
Nick Collison 6'10"
Nazr Mohammed 6'10"
Mitch McGary 6'10"
Steve Novak 6'10"

You listed literally all the tall guys you could find in the entire NBA for over Wilt's entire decade plus career. I just listed the tall guys on ONE team during just ONE season in a 30-team NBA. And, honestly, take out Kareem and there's more skill and athleticism in my ONE TEAM ONE SEASON list than in your entire freaking decade-long all-NBA list.

And Wilt would dominate all of them down low so what's the point.
 

LeMAO

All Star
Joined
May 30, 2013
Messages
1,969
Reputation
-500
Daps
3,847
Reppin
NULL
"Wilt played 160 postseason games, 49 against Bill Russell, 17 against Willis Reed, 17 against Nate Thurmond, 11 against Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and five against Jerry Lucas.

99 of Wilt’s 160 career playoff games was against a Hall of Fame center and Top 50 Player of All Time.


people here think that if westbrook born in that era is the same westbrook in this era. this is not DBZ.
no euro steps, no crossovers, no modern supplement or science etc back then
 

Originalman

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
47,127
Reputation
12,140
Daps
204,757
Nah I'm just having fun.
But real talk: advances in various areas do make things better for today's players. That's just true in all aspects of life. Not just sports.

Not including the way the game is played. Some aspects would be harder going back in time. Such as rebounding for guards. Less outside shots means less rebounds for guards. Also the game was played inside first then out.

Willis Reed even mentioned the lane being made wider hurt post players and stopped them from getting more rebounds. The lane being 16 foot wide instead of 12 foot wide makes it harder for big men to score and rebound.

Finally ain't no 2 steps plus garther move....that is a travel back in the day and means less explosive plays.

Edit - lets also not forget during wilts day guys only got 1 step. That was loosened to 2 steps with Dr. J and 70s basketball then finally now guys get 3 steps with one of the steps being a gather.

Having 3 steps really helps these kats.
 
Last edited:

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
78,029
Reputation
23,671
Daps
355,263
Not including the way the game is played. Some aspects would be harder going back in time. Such as rebounding for guards. Less outside shots means more rebounds for guards. Also the game was played inside first then out.

Willis Reed even mentioned the lane being made wider hurt post players and stopped them from getting more rebounds. The lane being 12 foot wide instead of 16 foot wide makes it harder for big men to score and rebound.

Finally ain't no 2 steps plus garther move....that is a travel back in the day and means less explosive plays.

Edit - lets also not forget during wilts day guys only got 1 step. That was loosened to 2 steps with Dr. J and 70s basketball then finally now guys get 3 steps with one of the steps being a gather.

Having 3 steps really helps these kats.
:ehh:
 

Kane

#BonesGANG
Joined
Jul 26, 2014
Messages
3,339
Reputation
1,470
Daps
20,215
Reppin
Chicago
1961-1962 - 9 teams (12 man roster times 9 teams, 108 total players)
1967-1968 - 12 teams (12 man roster times 12 teams, 144 total players)
1968-1969 - 14 teams (12 man roster times 12 teams, 168 total players)

20 all stars out of 144 and 168 players. Seems like small number was all stars compared to the entire players in the league. Looks like you can't do the math :ohhh:

What are you talking about? :dahell:

A much higher percentage of the league were All-Stars in the 60s than today. That's an undeniable fact.
 

TUA TAGOVAILOA

Superstar
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
18,321
Reputation
-235
Daps
15,977
Reppin
bama
espndb_1962nbachamp_576.jpg


This was the damn team that won 10 championships in a row:hhh:

Russell is 6'9'' and he is the tallest player on the team by a few inches
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,568
Reputation
19,531
Daps
201,380
Reppin
the ether
Who's gonna stop him in the paint, Draymond Green? :heh: :dead:

Willis Reed was 6'9" and wasn't especially athletic or skilled on defense compared to big men today.

Wilt played 17 career playoff games against Reed. He went 7-10 in those games, averaging 19ppg and shooting 34% from the line.

Nate Thurmond was 6'11" and wasn't a great leaper.

Wilt played 17 career playoff games against Nate. He went 12-5, but only averaged 12.5ppg and shot 37% from the line.

Jerry Lucas was a 6'8" White dude with no real athleticism who once said, "I had no special desire to be an NBA player" .

Wilt played 18 career playoff games against Lucas. He went 11-7, averaging 21ppg and shooting 46% from the line.

There are PLENTY of things any decent modern NBA team could do to contain Wilt.
 
Last edited:

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,568
Reputation
19,531
Daps
201,380
Reppin
the ether
"Wilt played 160 postseason games, 49 against Bill Russell, 17 against Willis Reed, 17 against Nate Thurmond, 11 against Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and five against Jerry Lucas.

99 of Wilt’s 160 career playoff games was against a Hall of Fame center and Top 50 Player of All Time.


people here think that if westbrook born in that era is the same westbrook in this era. this is not DBZ.
no euro steps, no crossovers, no modern supplement or science etc back then

Let's just ignore that outside Kareem, those guys are 6'9", 6'9", 6'11", and 6'8" and Wilt sucked against all of them. No one says, "Wilt is Top-5 ever because he repeatedly got washed in the playoffs by Russell and Reed, never held Kareem under 34ppg and literally got tripled-up by him for a series, couldn't score at all against Thurmond (18ppg, 12ppg, and 7ppg in their three series), and got outscored in the Finals by Lucas."
 
Last edited:
Top