The Legacies Of The Cavs,Warriors And...Gil Scott Herion

Which Team is an all time great

  • Cavs

  • Warriors

  • Both

  • Neither


Results are only viewable after voting.

Illeye buckmatic

I Don't Stunt I Regulate
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
31,143
Reputation
32,075
Daps
127,830
Reppin
A Buckeye State Of Mind
This is why the whole discussion silly to begin with. The bolded makes absolutely no sense. So the only thing that separates GS being a top 5 team of all time from not being mentioned at all is Kyrie's 3? Nah bruh. This playoffs proved that they're not one of the best teams of all time. They went 7-7 in the last two series losing 5 of the 7 by at least 14 points including losses by 30 and 28 or some shyt. No.
I would've given them that for winning a chip the same season as winning 73. I could see your argument cause that's a lot off losses in the playoffs. But that ring would've made up for it. And other atg teams went 7 games during their run.
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,795
Reputation
984
Daps
106,191
That's like saying curry losing dray and klay being subtle detail
Yet they're really tryna run with this "both years were the same" rhetoric, as if losing Bogut's 12 mins for 3 games and Dray getting his dumbass suspended for 1 game is on equal ground with the situation Cleveland was in last season.
 

OG_StankBrefs

Da Spice...
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,540
Reputation
6,715
Daps
98,663
Reppin
Caladan
nikkas had 2-5 jokes ready :mjlol:

fukk the Warriors and their illegal screen, dikk kicking, wanna be NWO looking ass.

Don't care about their all time status. All I know is Bron and Kyrie helped take down a 73 win team.

:wow:

Sheeiiiit, nikka. I actually wanna thank da Warriors for all thier accolades & hype dis year. Thank dat whole organization.

Thier monumental L helped to finally push Bron into dat teflon gawd status and made Kyrie & da Cavs historic NBA Finals legends.

We preciate it dearly. :banderas:


To da Greatness of da Golden State Warriors:

giphy.gif

 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,575
Reputation
8,728
Daps
225,520
Yet they're really tryna run with this "both years were the same" rhetoric, as if losing Bogut's 12 mins for 3 games and Dray getting his dumbass suspended for 1 game is on equal ground with the situation Cleveland was in last season.
Nobody said they were the same. Just that there's a double standard going on here. Be honest "for once in your miserable life". The amount of lies and manipulative tactics you use is why it's IMPOSSIBLE to have a proper discussion with you.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,826
Reputation
2,195
Daps
56,258
I would've given them that for winning a chip the same season as winning 73. I could see your argument cause that's a lot off losses in the playoffs. But that ring would've made up for it. And other atg teams went 7 games during their run.
I think this team illustrates the problem with judging teams/players just based on stats. On paper 73-9 plus the ring would qualify them as one of the best of all time, but when you take the eye test into account they didn't measure up regardless of the ring. It's no coincidence that everyone arguing for the Wareiors being atg is just talking and accomplishments, shyt that you only see on paper. None of them are talking about their actual play on the court. I would expect the discussions here to be more in depth and analytical. It's disappointing that a lot of these posters are on some simple superficial stat boy shyt.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,575
Reputation
8,728
Daps
225,520
But the 15-16 warriors didn't even win one chip. We all agree last years warriors wasn't an atg right?
What they've accomplished over the last two seasons means they're an atg team. Obviously they're not ranked as highly if they were to win back-to-back titles, but they're still classified as an atg.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,575
Reputation
8,728
Daps
225,520
I think this team illustrates the problem with judging teams/players just based on stats. On paper 73-9 plus the ring would qualify them as one of the best of all time, but when you take the eye test into account they didn't measure up regardless of the ring. It's no coincidence that everyone arguing for the Wareiors being atg is just talking and accomplishments, shyt that you only see on paper. None of them are talking about their actual play on the court. I would expect the discussions here to be more in depth and analytical. It's disappointing that a lot of these posters are on some simple superficial stat boy shyt.
:mjlol:

Because they don't uphold the traditional standard of how the game should be played? fukk your eye-test.
 
Top