The Lead Attorney Analysis Of The Fani Willis Situation

[Black Panther]

nikka your takes are dogshyt. Just stop.

Dude be saying the most obtuse things with his whole chest

 

[CHICAGO]

​

This nikka was hating on Wade because his dumb ass got fired and didn’t realize it’ll blow up in his face.

But okay. Explain that then. How do you go that far and back track so hard? Why would a grown man say all of this just to backtrack it in the hearing?

ITS OBVIOUS SOMEONE GOT TO HIM.

ITS ONE THING TO BE SAYING
WHATEVER TO THIS BROAD IN A TEXT.

ITS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
THING TO RECIEVE THE MOTION
TO DISQUALIFY FANI FROM THE CASE
AND OK IT.

HE WAS 10 TOES IN.




​

 

[Germms]

ITS OBVIOUS SOMEONE GOT TO HIM.

ITS ONE THING TO BE SAYING
WHATEVER TO THIS BROAD IN A TEXT.

ITS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
THING TO RECIEVE THE MOTION
TO DISQUALIFY FANI FROM THE CASE
AND OK IT.

HE WAS 10 TOES IN.




​

Someone got to him? Do you realize that man can literally just say that? He’s an attorney and the media coverage that’ll come with that would melt Fani and Wade to hell.

He didn’t think he was going to take the stand. Seat got hot as hell and he was annoyed.

 

[Black Panther]

ITS OBVIOUS SOMEONE GOT TO HIM.

ITS ONE THING TO BE SAYING
WHATEVER TO THIS BROAD IN A TEXT.

ITS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
THING TO RECIEVE THE MOTION
TO DISQUALIFY FANI FROM THE CASE
AND OK IT.

HE WAS 10 TOES IN.




​

This doesn't mean as much as you think.

The defense looked like a clown show today.

 

[CHICAGO]

Someone got to him? Do you realize that man can literally just say that? He’s an attorney and the media coverage that’ll come with that would melt Fani and Wade to hell.

He didn’t think he was going to take the stand. Seat got hot as hell and he was annoyed.

HE PROOF READ THE MOTION TWICE.
THE MOTION THAT WAS BUILT AROUND
HIS TESTIMONY AND OK'ED IT.

THERES NO WAY THIS LAWYER
DIDNT THINK HE WAS GOING TO TAKE THE STAND.

YOU ACT LIKE THIS IS
SOME REGULAR nikka FROM THE COLI.







​

 

[Germms]

HE PROOF READ THE MOTION TWICE.
THE MOTION THAT WAS BUILT AROUND
HIS TESTIMONY AND OK'ED IT.

THERES NO WAY THIS LAWYER
DIDNT THINK HE WAS GOING TO TAKE THE STAND.

YOU ACT LIKE THIS IS
SOME REGULAR nikka FROM THE COLI.







​

Just because you okay the motion doesn’t mean he knew he’ll take the stand. He was pillow talking and was unprepared. Didn’t want to seem like a liar to Ms. Merchant because he wanted to smash/smashed and/or was scorned because he lost his job.

He knew if he went on that stand and said all that shyt he’d have to prove it someway somehow. But I see we’ll just have to agree to disagree.

 

[Germms]

Dude be saying the most obtuse things with his whole chest

Why would a nikka who shyt himself on the stand today be taken seriously in closing arguments

Let’s think.

 

[Nigerianwonder]

nikka your takes are dogshyt. Just stop.

Bradley got caught pillow talking and gossiping. Now he’s caught up in the garbage and wants to be truthful on the stand. Thats it. He fukked himself.

They haven’t proved shyt in two weeks. The whole goal of this was to let people know they were “moving sloppy”. When they were just fukking. Everybody fukks. Lawyers, doctors, teachers. Everybody.

Come Friday I doubt there will be a decision going the way you think it is.

Once again clowns like you have been wrong every step of the way. Yall were saying last week bradley wasnt even gonna be called back to the stand and typing essays about why the judge couldnt force him to testify and yall were wrong again. The only person that believes bradley was truthful on the stand today was you. Bradley didn't even believe himself and admitted as much cause he couldn't provide any explanation for saying he was speculating now in his direct answers he gave when reviewing the accuracy of the motion to dismiss. They asked this man if he remembered saying fani and wade were banging in the office backroom and this fool squinted for 5 minutes before answering. This is a republican judge btw.

The emails and text are already admitted as evidence. The judge will consider them and there is no way anything bradley said today is more believable than the original statements he made and previously confirmed multiple times in writing as accurate.

 

[T’Challa’s Heir]

Once again clowns like you have been wrong every step of the way. Yall were saying last week bradley wasnt even gonna be called back to the stand and typing essays about why the judge couldnt force him to testify and yall were wrong again. The only person that believes bradley was truthful on the stand today was you. Bradley didn't even believe himself and admitted as much cause he couldn't provide any explanation for saying he was speculating now in his direct answers he gave when reviewing the accuracy of the motion to dismiss. They asked this man if he remembered saying fani and wade were banging in the office backroom and this fool squinted for 5 minutes before answering. This is a republican judge btw.

The emails and text are already admitted as evidence. The judge will consider them and there is no way anything bradley said today is more believable than the original statements he made and previously confirmed multiple times in writing as accurate.

So we’re clear, you’re saying texts and statements that weren’t under oath and penalty of perjury are more credible than what happened on the stand? When Bradley wouldn’t stand 10 toes down and say it when it mattered? Is that what you’re saying?

 

[Black Panther]

Once again clowns like you have been wrong every step of the way. Yall were saying last week bradley wasnt even gonna be called back to the stand and typing essays about why the judge couldnt force him to testify and yall were wrong again. The only person that believes bradley was truthful on the stand today was you. Bradley didn't even believe himself and admitted as much cause he couldn't provide any explanation for saying he was speculating now in his direct answers he gave when reviewing the accuracy of the motion to dismiss. They asked this man if he remembered saying fani and wade were banging in the office backroom and this fool squinted for 5 minutes before answering. This is a republican judge btw.

The emails and text are already admitted as evidence. The judge will consider them and there is no way anything bradley said today is more believable than the original statements he made and previously confirmed multiple times in writing as accurate.

Simple question: what is the legal argument as to why Fani Willis should be removed?

 

[LeVraiPapi]

Simple question: what is the legal argument as to why Fani Willis should be removed?

Like @Gloxina said because what she did was shameful.

 

[Germms]

Once again clowns like you have been wrong every step of the way. Yall were saying last week bradley wasnt even gonna be called back to the stand and typing essays about why the judge couldnt force him to testify and yall were wrong again. The only person that believes bradley was truthful on the stand today was you. Bradley didn't even believe himself and admitted as much cause he couldn't provide any explanation for saying he was speculating now in his direct answers he gave when reviewing the accuracy of the motion to dismiss. They asked this man if he remembered saying fani and wade were banging in the office backroom and this fool squinted for 5 minutes before answering. This is a republican judge btw.

The emails and text are already admitted as evidence. The judge will consider them and there is no way anything bradley said today is more believable than the original statements he made and previously confirmed multiple times in writing as accurate.

Answer the questions below p*ssy boy

So we’re clear, you’re saying texts and statements that weren’t under oath and penalty of perjury are more credible than what happened on the stand? When Bradley wouldn’t stand 10 toes down and say it when it mattered? Is that what you’re saying?

Simple question: what is the legal argument as to why Fani Willis should be removed?

 

[Nigerianwonder]

So we’re clear, you’re saying texts and statements that weren’t under oath and penalty of perjury are more credible than what happened on the stand? When Bradley wouldn’t stand 10 toes down and say it when it mattered? Is that what you’re saying?

Are you not aware that the text and statements are indeed entered as evidence and that he confirmed all the statements in the emails and text as his own under oath dummy? What you want to argue is a separate subjective question as to whether you believe bradley to be credible when he stated he was speculating. Bradley changing his story does not make the evidence go away especially when its literally written down and was reviewed multiple times by him for accuracy (which he confirmed under oath as well). That excuse wouldn't get you out of a traffic ticket and nobody with half a brain would believe him... perhaps you.. but not the judge. And thats who will decide regardless of what he claimed today on the stand.

 

[Nigerianwonder]

Simple question: what is the legal argument as to why Fani Willis should be removed?

Are you that dumb to wear you still don't realize what this hearing is about? They are gearing up for closing arguments and you are still stuck on stupid. If you dont know by now why this hearing is even taking place then why are you in this thread?

 

[Nigerianwonder]

So you're saying that the defense's star witness in establishing why Fani should be removed from the case is unreliable?

The witness, Bradley, is not on trial nor the subject of the ethics hearing. Fani Willis is. His reliability is irrelevant. What is relevant is if he has knowledge or info pertaining to the the subject matter of the hearing. The credibility of the info he claimed he knew, email and text evidence and the testimony he gave will be judged on their own merits.