Yea, the original plot was suppose to put Tom Hagen against Michael Corleone. They should've gave him Diane Keatons bag since I think all he asked for was like 3 mil and they paid her more while he had a much more pivotal role as a main character. I would've dropped out too.One of the things that hurt the most is that Paramount refused to pay Robert Duvall more money, so he chose not to be in the movie. They had to write him out of the script.
3 was sorely missing Tom Hagen.
Godfather 1 & 2 were classics
but 3??? I mean wtf was that shıt, so ass and Sophia Coppola's terrible expressionless face in acting....
This movie should've received terrible ratings.
Yea, the original plot was suppose to put Tom Hagen against Michael Corleone. They should've gave him Diane Keatons bag since I think all he asked for was like 3 mil and they paid her more while he had a much more pivotal role as a main character. I would've dropped out too.
It was cathartic to say the least. I think the director chose to kill her over Michael based on her performance.My friend told me he saw it in the theater and some people in the audience cheered when she got shot
They should've never made this movie and just stopped at 2. The story was very convoluted with pope assassination. It was disingenuous to put Sophia in it at all. They could've killed her in the first 30 min and had Vincent go to war against Michael.Yup, and it also was gonna involve their sons. The original idea was that the CIA came to Michael Corleone to collaborate in assassinating a South American dictator, things go badly etc etc. Then it shifted to Michael's son being a CIA agent involved in the assassination before ultimately taking over the family (and being influenced/compromised by the CIA). Tom Hagen was involved in both ideas and was trying to wrestle control of the family away due to the CIA shyt.