says the guy who owns all threeNintendo is not a competitor to Sony or Microsoft and hasn't been so in years. Almost nobody walks into a store and makes an either or decision to buy a Nintendo console vs a Sony / Microsoft console.
says the guy who owns all threeNintendo is not a competitor to Sony or Microsoft and hasn't been so in years. Almost nobody walks into a store and makes an either or decision to buy a Nintendo console vs a Sony / Microsoft console.
The type of gamer? Why is that distinction even being made? If the switch ran games like the "trash" series S LOTS of people would EASILY just cop a switch and be completely golden.So you saying the type of gamer that wants to play stuff like Grand Theft Auto, Madden, Fifa, Battlefield, Call of Duty is seriously looking at a Switch and a PS5 and weighing which one they want and will only buy one? The primary driver of a Nintendo console purchase is Nintendo content almost exclusively.
The buyer of a PlayStation or Xbox wants those high profile 3rd party games. The determining factor of which they get is the exclusive content or either of those platforms that calls to them more.
Sony vs Microsoft is mostly a zero sum game. People have no issue owning both a PlayStation and a Switch. Most people (outside of enthusiast) will say owning both an Xbox and a PlayStation is not worth it to them.
The game cube didn't really jump off because it was strictly a gaming system. Didn't have online and like No 3rd party support for the 1st year almost.Yes because they haven’t done that before
We must have short memories because the PS2 slaughtered the GameCube
The game cube didn't really jump off because it was strictly a gaming system. Didn't have online and like No 3rd party support for the 1st year almost.
It did however still spawn some of Nintendo's most current day iconic characters
Fanboys can ignore the evidence all they want but Nintendos greatest success post SNES has been in the mobile/portable space which is why they are thriving with the Switch now. Its basically their next handheld, which is why they are in their own separate market
I agree that Nintendo is in it's own lane, but this is inaccurate. You can't skip over the Wii, which is still the 5th most sold console ever.
That outsold the PS3 and X360 both
Their failures are their failures, but their successes are their successesThe Wii still only sold like 10 million more units than the ps3 and xbox 360. It wasn’t exactly a huge blow out like it has been for the GameCube, N64, and Wii U vs playstations consoles.
Their failures are their failures, but their successes are their successes
The Wii was a massive win for them.
Xbots only play dude bro games. Sony Stans only play movie games. Nintendo Stans only play Pokemon. PC Stans only play Mechwarrior
none of them compete
So what? Did they left the console market? They have been and are still are one of the most recognized consoles. But now becauseNintendo still barely has online or 3rd party support, nothing has changed.
It just proves that nintendo has been in their own bubble for 3 decades, which proves the point of FTC’s claim. The power of the GameCube and games like Resident Evil 4 did nothing to turn the tide which is why they gave up trying to compete with power
So what? Did they left the console market?
The switch 2 could be more powerful than a Series S then wha
the FTC defines the high-performance console market as Gen 9 systems like the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X/S. Since the Switch is technically a Gen 8 console because it launched in 2017 and lacks comparative power akin to its competitors' newer hardware, Nintendo is not included in this market.
Read more: FTC argues semantics, creates new console market that doesn't include Nintendo