ATearInMyEye
#KnicksTape
Re-watching the game, Iggy looking brolic as a fukk
:Piratedame::Piratedame::Piratedame::Piratedame::Piratedame::Piratedame:Re-watching the game, Iggy looking brolic as a fukk
Re-watching the game, Iggy looking brolic as a fukk
I just saw this post.Lebron has damn near a 40-point trip while Durant lets Steph and Klay do more work all night, but Durant the better player cause he fresh at the end and James ain't?
The difference is that when Durant needs a breather, he has Iggy to guard Lebron with Draymond backing him, while Lebron stuck relying on fukking Richard Jefferson and Kevin Love for defensive help.
You know you see it @GIL-Scott Heroin.
you being sarcastic?Clear foul
I remember thinking how he's at the crib and only got 2 fts (at the time) finished with 6 and brehs were saying the refs were helping the Cavs
I just saw this post.
You can't be serious with this. I don't ever remember you applying this same type of reasoning to their H2H record, more specifically the 2012 Finals. Why only play this game when LeBron's team is losing, if you're not going to do it when his team is winning?
Series aint over yet. Bet the Cavs win the next 2
you being sarcastic?
Say Word?
All over again
Eh, its more than just Kobe stans who think the best player should take the shot in that scenario no matter what.First of all, I'm not weighing into account the collective opinion of the philistine Kobe stans when I talk about the consensus. I said his approach is looked at in that way - meaning folk look at jacking up shots over multiple defenders down the stretch as the wrong thing to do. But then they make the mistake of thinking the opposite is the right way to go about things, and what is opposite to that - passing in the same shell.
I don't think it's even a matter or "right or wrong" though. There's more than one way to skin a cat. Certain players shooting over a double/triple team is a perfectly fine option depending on who's shooting/defending. Other times finding an open teammate is just as acceptable.I'm talking about what folk perceive to be the right play on this board though, most folk that subscribe to the Mamba system aren't really concerned with what the right/wrong play is, but just taking the shot no matter what. Kobe stans and alike aren't really trying to be the voice of reason on this - which is whom I'm talking about.
Of course it is if Korver's shot goes in there's no discussion about the play on talk radio/the blogosphere etc. and since the Cavs were up at the time we don't even get the "Korver saved LeBron" hot takes. Not making any judgement on what your take would be.Except it's not.
Nobody other than you mentions this if the shot goes in. Not sure what you mean by take advantage of the Warriors switch either? IF he's able to get by Draymond there I would assume Iggy just rotates over since he's already moving in that direction. BTW was that a mistake by Steph to switch that back?He wasted time dribbling out the clock (letting the Warriors defense get set and adjust) and didn't take advantage of the Warriors switch (Curry and Iggy - when Curry had his backed turned that was the time to drive), and Draymond giving him a brief period to drive. He forced the ball to a shooter when he ran into a dead end with the clock running out, failing to realize that his tendency to pass in those situations was already forecasted by Curry who was right on Korver the moment he caught the ball. You could see it coming from a mile away, it's what Bron typically does when he gets into the paint and doesn't want to score.
I agree with this to the point and there are plenty of times when Bron is guilty of overpassing, I just don't think this is one of them. Usually when he overpasses, he either ignores a clear lane/path to the rim when's he's already driven into the paint and/or he kicks it out to someone not open/ready to shoot outside the 3point line late in the clock. Neither was the case/hereSame reason how teams knew what Kobe was going to do, except one is a direct result of their own chaos and the other isn't. It's why it's easy for one's eyes to acknowledge someone overshooting, than it is someone who's overpassing. We do this in basketball, players who shoot too much aren't looked upon fondly, whereas players who pass, pass, pass are looked at as playing the game the right way.
They walked it up and didn't get into their offense until around 15 seconds on the clock. It's fair to say LeBron wasted some time on the perimeter, but again he's facing the best defender in the world. There's no guarantee he gets a better shot just by going earlier. You've mentioned in the past Draymond might be the best defender in the history of the game. You really think the better option for Cleveland was LeBron taking him one on one with Durant lurking in the paint?Problem was, he had a number of options that were given to him that would've resulted in a higher probability of his team getting a bucket, but he chose one that was near the bottom of the list.
Eh there are no real probabilities to speak of here, this is all conjecture, but in general Cavs get better shots in these situations when LeBron is able to find a shooter then when he tries to create his own shot (except when he can get to the rim).Based on probability there is, but there's no right or wrong approach in general. All about finding a balance, like it is with everything in basketball and life in general. The act of passing to a highly-efficient shooter in the corner in a vacuum is a good decision, however, the way LeBron went about it and his tendency of making that pass late in games most certainly wasn't.
Coli will always..Warriors haters so lost in da sauce right now. They say Durant joined a superteam, then in da same breath say Curry/Draymond/Klay are overrated.