tremonthustler1
aka bx_representer
I'm not wrong at all about Melo /Darko. Melo wasn't gonna play over Prince as long as he didn't defend.I'm not going to argue Melo vs Darko even though you're pretty wrong that Melo wouldn't have moved the needle more than Darko.
Regarding Wiggins that's all hypothetical. There's no real reason to believe that they wouldn't have still traded for Shumpert and Smith, especially since Wiggins was a rookie and they still would've needed veteran help, shooting and perimeter D. And I can certainly argue that Wiggins could've contributed more this year as I already have. How is that a moot point when its the entire premise of this thread? And again, Just because Cle reached their end goal doesn't mean they used the most efficient method to get there. Also with Wiggins they would've had more cap space available than when they took on Love's contract. That means they could've had a guy that contributes just as much if not more, plus more flexibility. To be clear, at the time I thought it was a win win trade and with the info available at the time it was the right move. What changed was GSW and their death lineup which essentially rendered Love a role player against them specifically which is why I believe Wiggins would be a much better fit for them against GSW specifically who has been their only challenger.
For Wiggins, if you still trade for Smith /Shumpert, you've marginalized the hell out of your #1 pick star prodigy to where he'd be viewed as a disappointment for being treated like a long term project. At the end of the day you're trying to argue that Wiggins would have contributed more by playing lesser and inconveniencing your best player instead of the guy who disappointed in Loce yet they still won. At best it's a wash for Cleveland and whether the means to get to a title was efficient or not, they got there. They'd do it all again the same way if they could.