I can hear this gif
1. You still haven’t explain the relevance of Alfonso v’s nickname to a discussion about the genealogical origins of blacks in the Americas1.
2/3. Yea Alfonso V is very relevant. Cacs and clowns that follow them want to slam in everyone's heads that black people were slaves, yet no one mentions that the word itself is tied to cac slavs that came from Eastern Europe. So cacs went from being black (meant pale in old English) slaves to white (when wight meant human in old English). And (modern day) blacks became the ones synonymous with being slaves while somehow notching the "black" title. To pretend that a flip in the way people are viewed and labeled means nothing is just you covering your eyes to maintain a weak narrative.
4. I never said any number of blacks are descendants of royalty. I've said there were black people in America before cacs. Those are facts whether you want to accept it or not. You trying to label acknowledging that as self hate is lazy armchair psychobabble. That and also cac babble. Pretending that someone saying there people that look like him ruling in places around the world and not only Africa means they hate themselves is goofball level reaching. Total clown shyt
5th or 6th, in one of those anti-hate books for kidsLet me know what grade you were told that the word "slave" originally referenced cac slavs from Eastern Europe.
You're confusing Old English which died out in the 1400s with modernAfter that, remind me when you learned that "wight"originally was used to reference being alive/human while "black" in the past was used to reference being pale.
I was told about the Moors as far back as I could remember, thing is, it's not relevant to modern Black history, they had a stranglehold then cacs started fukking over Black people they've never encountered beforeMaybe after that you can even let everyone know what grade you were when you were taught about the stranglehold moors had on Europe? You will probably lie and pretend that these things are taught in American public schools lol. Who knows?
I wouldn't say them in person because I stopped hanging around people who hate themselves a long time agoWhats clear is that you'll struggle to bring anything that actually has substance to the table beyond insults you wouldn't say if you weren't behind a computer screen
That wikipedia article says the guy traveled from Spain on a Spanish expedition and got shipwrecked. He was not in America before the EuropeansBlack people been traveled on this side of the world before cacs Europeans use to take Africans with them as their navigators.
Estevanico - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
This is just one example. But i'm not about to push the narrative that we all was over here and there was no slave ships
KYS.Slave word origin: The term slave has its origins in the word slav. The slavs, who inhabited a large part of Eastern Europe, were taken as slaves by the Muslims of Spain during the ninth century AD.
Slave = white person
"Muslims" of Spain = black moors
white/wight original meaning:
A living being in general; a creature.
A human being, man or woman, person. Now archaic or dialect…
black original meaning:
pale, shining, white
modern synonyms of black:
tragic, disastrous, calamitous ,catastrophic, cataclysmic, ruinous, devastating, fatal, fateful. wretched, woeful, grievous
Believe false cac renditions of history and identify your people based on Slav(ery) "brehs"
that's not proof. there's pyramids on every continent maybe except Australia. that is not certifiable proof of Black presence, it would be circumstantial at best and you would still have to prove that Black people built all pyramids before you start using the existence of Pyramids to mark Black presence. and this is the issue. if Black people were always here there really shouldn't be an issue finding actual evidence not just reaching. we need to exum bones of brehs dating back to pre colonial times and carbon date them. there's no way people were here. established and are absolutely invisible today yet the Indians around them left many traces. that's highly unlikelyThere is plenty of proof. There are damn near more Pyramids on this side of the earth as the other side. A lot of hebrew inscriptions too
right because black people been all over the world. We are not limited to one continent. We have migrated or some of us moved throughout history to every corner of the worldthat's not proof. there's pyramids on every continent maybe except Australia. that is not certifiable proof of Black presence, it would be circumstantial at best and you would still have to prove that Black people built all pyramids before you start using the existence of Pyramids to mark Black presence. and this is the issue. if Black people were always here there really shouldn't be an issue finding actual evidence not just reaching. we need to exum bones of brehs dating back to pre colonial times and carbon date them. there's no way people were here. established and are absolutely invisible today yet the Indians around them left many traces. that's highly unlikely
Cap5th or 6th, in one of those anti-hate books for kids
Thats not confusing anything. The language clearly got flipped. Cacs were the slaves and now they want to associate black people with being slaves. Cacs were the people "black" applied to and now they want it to apply to whatever "black" people used to address themselves as. I mean you do know, they didn't address themselves by a color only till cacs put that on them right?You're confusing Old English which died out in the 1400s with modern
Yea I know you wouldn't. Coward that gets his feelings hurt when someone questions the false narratives he believes and puts his life onI wouldn't say them in person
Million of subscribers this dude has and decides to make a skit like this
dude is a plant.You want to be everything else but black
Which I’m proud to be and verified
Move around, this ain’t a pawg thread, Oreo