The Black divers excavating slave shipwrecks: ‘I’m telling my ancestors: I’m with you’

Peauxboy

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
1,011
Reputation
347
Daps
2,698
dVNkh9.gif

:russ: I can hear this gif
 

Savvir

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
19,183
Reputation
2,739
Daps
99,581
1.:russell:

2/3. Yea Alfonso V is very relevant. Cacs and clowns that follow them want to slam in everyone's heads that black people were slaves, yet no one mentions that the word itself is tied to cac slavs that came from Eastern Europe. So cacs went from being black (meant pale in old English) slaves to white (when wight meant human in old English). And (modern day) blacks became the ones synonymous with being slaves while somehow notching the "black" title. To pretend that a flip in the way people are viewed and labeled means nothing is just you covering your eyes to maintain a weak narrative.

4. I never said any number of blacks are descendants of royalty. I've said there were black people in America before cacs. Those are facts whether you want to accept it or not. You trying to label acknowledging that as self hate is lazy armchair psychobabble. That and also cac babble. Pretending that someone saying there people that look like him ruling in places around the world and not only Africa means they hate themselves is goofball level reaching. Total clown shyt
:unimpressed:
1. You still haven’t explain the relevance of Alfonso v’s nickname to a discussion about the genealogical origins of blacks in the Americas

2. When did I say all blacks in the Americas descended from slaves? Quote me. When did I say there were no blacks in the Americas? Quote me.

3. What does black royalty have to do with anything we are talking about? When did I say that blacks kings didn’t exist? I’m talking about geneology. If most blacks (and other races for that matter) don’t descend from royalty…. Why are we even talking about “jewelry and crowns” in the first place?

4. What’s your source on black meaning “white/pale” in old English?

5. What’s the relevance of old English (which stopped being spoken in the 11th century) to terms and language used during the transatlantic slave trade?
 

Fill Collins

I didn't mean to verge!
Joined
Jun 19, 2019
Messages
10,826
Reputation
2,826
Daps
33,718
Let me know what grade you were told that the word "slave" originally referenced cac slavs from Eastern Europe.
5th or 6th, in one of those anti-hate books for kids

After that, remind me when you learned that "wight"originally was used to reference being alive/human while "black" in the past was used to reference being pale.
You're confusing Old English which died out in the 1400s with modern :skip:

Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/blaikaz - Wiktionary, the free dictionary is where we got the term bleach, that's the Germanic influence

Maybe after that you can even let everyone know what grade you were when you were taught about the stranglehold moors had on Europe? You will probably lie and pretend that these things are taught in American public schools lol. Who knows?
I was told about the Moors as far back as I could remember, thing is, it's not relevant to modern Black history, they had a stranglehold then cacs started fukking over Black people they've never encountered before

Whats clear is that you'll struggle to bring anything that actually has substance to the table beyond insults you wouldn't say if you weren't behind a computer screen
:coffee:
I wouldn't say them in person because I stopped hanging around people who hate themselves a long time ago
 

Geordi

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2018
Messages
2,701
Reputation
596
Daps
13,123
Black people been traveled on this side of the world before cacs Europeans use to take Africans with them as their navigators.


This is just one example. But i'm not about to push the narrative that we all was over here and there was no slave ships
That wikipedia article says the guy traveled from Spain on a Spanish expedition and got shipwrecked. He was not in America before the Europeans
 

TheKongoEmpire

The First Men
Joined
Jan 3, 2015
Messages
5,604
Reputation
1,172
Daps
13,778
Reppin
The Original Man and the First Gods
Hebrew
Israelites
Hebrew Israelite
Moors
Copper-colored Aborigines won't like this. Well I ask again: which one are we and why is it I only hear these stories from America and no where else? What of the Maroon communities in the "New World"?
 
Last edited:

chkmeout

marshawn lynch handshake
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
8,405
Reputation
-606
Daps
23,249
Slave word origin: The term slave has its origins in the word slav. The slavs, who inhabited a large part of Eastern Europe, were taken as slaves by the Muslims of Spain during the ninth century AD.

Slave = white person
"Muslims" of Spain = black moors

white/wight original meaning:
A living being in general; a creature.
A human being, man or woman, person. Now archaic or dialect…

black original meaning:
pale, shining, white

modern synonyms of black:
tragic, disastrous, calamitous ,catastrophic, cataclysmic, ruinous, devastating, fatal, fateful. wretched, woeful, grievous

Believe false cac renditions of history and identify your people based on Slav(ery) "brehs" :mjlol:
KYS.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
70,018
Reputation
13,658
Daps
296,881
Reppin
Toronto
There is plenty of proof. There are damn near more Pyramids on this side of the earth as the other side. A lot of hebrew inscriptions too
that's not proof. there's pyramids on every continent maybe except Australia. that is not certifiable proof of Black presence, it would be circumstantial at best and you would still have to prove that Black people built all pyramids before you start using the existence of Pyramids to mark Black presence. and this is the issue. if Black people were always here there really shouldn't be an issue finding actual evidence not just reaching. we need to exum bones of brehs dating back to pre colonial times and carbon date them. there's no way people were here. established and are absolutely invisible today yet the Indians around them left many traces. that's highly unlikely
 

ReturnOfJudah

Veteran
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
35,077
Reputation
-693
Daps
107,221
that's not proof. there's pyramids on every continent maybe except Australia. that is not certifiable proof of Black presence, it would be circumstantial at best and you would still have to prove that Black people built all pyramids before you start using the existence of Pyramids to mark Black presence. and this is the issue. if Black people were always here there really shouldn't be an issue finding actual evidence not just reaching. we need to exum bones of brehs dating back to pre colonial times and carbon date them. there's no way people were here. established and are absolutely invisible today yet the Indians around them left many traces. that's highly unlikely
right because black people been all over the world. We are not limited to one continent. We have migrated or some of us moved throughout history to every corner of the world
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,153
Reputation
-2,413
Daps
16,923
5th or 6th, in one of those anti-hate books for kids
Cap :russell:
You're confusing Old English which died out in the 1400s with modern :skip:
Thats not confusing anything. The language clearly got flipped. Cacs were the slaves and now they want to associate black people with being slaves. Cacs were the people "black" applied to and now they want it to apply to whatever "black" people used to address themselves as. I mean you do know, they didn't address themselves by a color only till cacs put that on them right?
I wouldn't say them in person
Yea I know you wouldn't. Coward that gets his feelings hurt when someone questions the false narratives he believes and puts his life on
:russell:
 
Top