The average Division I men's basketball player is worth $170,098 per year to his school

PortCityProphet

Follow me to the truth
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
80,690
Reputation
17,418
Daps
274,747
Reppin
Bama ass DC
You don't feel when that's done a string effort on the media /NBA part isn't made to not cover them come draft time ?
1. High school is when you get recognized. Going to college for a year doesn't do much scouts already know you before then.
2. All I'm ever told is that the NBA is a global game, they erreywhere and see erreythang :sas1:
 

Miggs

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
41,194
Reputation
3,139
Daps
82,023
Reppin
T.O.
If your argument hinges on the weakest link in the chain then you just cut off the link.

The 289th division one school not being able to pay their athletes is not a reason to not pay all athletes.

Colleges drop programs and curriculums all the time. All the time.

I have no problem with Appalachian State or whomever not having a football team if they can't properly support the athletes generating the revenues.

:sas1:


Exactly if im an employee at a company i dont give shyt what they revenues are,i expect to be paid for the work i do regardless...I dont care if they losing money that aint for me to figure out...
 

KingJay

Superstar
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
13,590
Reputation
3,361
Daps
62,034
Reppin
Philly bouls, Trust the Process
They're worth more than that. This is just the team revenue, think about the extra applications that result from these kids. Villanova had a 22% increase in applications after winning the national championship. They also set school records in fundraising I'm pretty sure, and alumni donations are probably pouring in.
 

KingJay

Superstar
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
13,590
Reputation
3,361
Daps
62,034
Reppin
Philly bouls, Trust the Process
They actually got options to get paid to ball tho :manny:
Any super talented player who don't go the Europe route for a year don't really care bout getting paid :manny:
This is just so false... First off, you're assuming that these 18 y/o kids coming fresh out of high school can play in Europe like it's nothing. You're asking 18 y/o kids, most of whom have never left the country, to live in Europe where they don't speak English and be totally on their own for a year. It's not like their parents can come over like it's nothing, these kids would be totally left to themselves in a foreign, often pretty racist, country totally unable to communicate.

It's also not as good for your draft stock. Yeah scouts "see everything" and all that, but look at the guys and it clearly hurts them. Terrence Ferguson fell totally off of a ton of boards by going to Australia, a much easier transition than other places. Some people thought he'd be a lottery. There's Frank Ntilikina who has always been in Europe, but scouts constantly say how they wish he'd be playing college ball in America and that if he was on a team like Kentucky he'd be way higher. Mudiay was arguably the top prospect coming in, but fell to 7th on draft night. Scouts highly questioned his decision assuming that he may have had some academic issues, and were really disappointed that he didn't play for Larry Brown. His development was clearly stunted by being in China, and he was mismanaged. Brandon Jennings was #1 in high school on ESPN, he fell to 10th come draft time. Another case of stunted development.

People act like these guys can ball out in Europe like it's nothing, leagues like the Spanish league are way tougher than college aside from all the other issues like lack of communication.

Look at the D-League where they make basically nothing. There's a reason they're playing there and not Europe, right?
 

feelosofer

#ninergang
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
47,675
Reputation
6,587
Daps
132,837
Reppin
Brick City, NJ
Nobody is paying $170k a YEAR for tuition and room and board. Not even med school students or lawyers pay this.

You're right I was thinking over four years. But either way, I think players deserve a stipend that way they don't have to be slapped with penalties for asking for extra fukking meatballs in their spaghetti dinners.
 

MJ Truth

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
38,058
Reputation
3,393
Daps
151,477
I've already explained my points clearly. This changes nothing. We understand the top programs are making money. If u still can't grasp it then there is no reason for me to continue

Ill just leave this here maybe it will help..
If a business in the real world loses money they don't then get to not pay their workforce. That's ludicrous.
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,866
Reputation
8,885
Daps
204,985
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
This is just so false... First off, you're assuming that these 18 y/o kids coming fresh out of high school can play in Europe like it's nothing. You're asking 18 y/o kids, most of whom have never left the country, to live in Europe where they don't speak English and be totally on their own for a year. It's not like their parents can come over like it's nothing, these kids would be totally left to themselves in a foreign, often pretty racist, country totally unable to communicate.

It's also not as good for your draft stock. Yeah scouts "see everything" and all that, but look at the guys and it clearly hurts them. Terrence Ferguson fell totally off of a ton of boards by going to Australia, a much easier transition than other places. Some people thought he'd be a lottery. There's Frank Ntilikina who has always been in Europe, but scouts constantly say how they wish he'd be playing college ball in America and that if he was on a team like Kentucky he'd be way higher. Mudiay was arguably the top prospect coming in, but fell to 7th on draft night. Scouts highly questioned his decision assuming that he may have had some academic issues, and were really disappointed that he didn't play for Larry Brown. His development was clearly stunted by being in China, and he was mismanaged. Brandon Jennings was #1 in high school on ESPN, he fell to 10th come draft time. Another case of stunted development.

People act like these guys can ball out in Europe like it's nothing, leagues like the Spanish league are way tougher than college aside from all the other issues like lack of communication.

Look at the D-League where they make basically nothing. There's a reason they're playing there and not Europe, right?
The problem with your argument is that if it were up to kids, they wouldn't go to college. They'd be 18 years old, on their own with a ton of money, left to themselves in an often racist country, only that country is here, because they'd just go pro. On the flip side, kids come from overseas all the time at a young age to live in North American where their English is either broken on nonexistent, totally on their own for at least 2 years. Hell, some of them move to different countries at younger ages, so this is not a unique problem. If they can do it for their career, it's hard to feel bad for the kid who thinks he's ready to be a man but can't handle outsourced work for a season.

Ferguson is still likely a first round pick when it's all said and done (and his experience in Australia will be judged on a curve because he faced stronger comp than anything he woulda saw in Arizona. They take that into account-- not that I thought he was top 10 worthy anyway) The rest of your examples were guys that would have likely dipped in stock just by being here. The difference is that they played heavier competition, so while it may have downed their stocks a bit, I doubt it would have affected the trajectory of their careers (and to top it off, that 1 year, they got paid, which is the whole point of going through this, right?) Also, they can always go to D-League and hang out there, but to an 18 year old kid, $20,000 in obscurity <<<< 0 but the world is on your jock.
 

The Fire

way more chemical than political
Supporter
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Messages
33,770
Reputation
10,430
Daps
139,242
Reppin
brooklyn
Problem is the top few players in each program skew this distribution. the 10th man on Wisconsin is worth a bag of peanuts to the school, so compensation becomes a bit problematic; do they sign professional style contracts?
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
79,097
Reputation
23,840
Daps
359,069
The problem with your argument is that if it were up to kids, they wouldn't go to college. They'd be 18 years old, on their own with a ton of money, left to themselves

...just like some white tennis player or golfer is free to do because there's no rule that Becky has to spend time in college before earning a living in America.

:sas2::mjpls:
 

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,396
Reputation
520
Daps
54,354
Reppin
Las Vegas
just cut the athletic programs that dont generate any positive revenue. let the tens (hundreds?) of thousands of kids each year who would otherwise not have an opportunity to receive a free education down to pay the hundred or so who actually have marketable names in each sport. makes sense. the solution is to allow college athletes to market themselves and their name, and do away with impermissible benefits. if someone wants to give a kid a stack because they liked his dunk last weekend who gives a shyt. thats about it though
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,866
Reputation
8,885
Daps
204,985
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
...just like some white tennis player or golfer is free to do because there's no rule that Becky has to spend time in college before earning a living in America.

:sas2::mjpls:
that's fine by me. I hope you don't think I'm advocating for mandatory time in college because I'm not. That's an NBA collective bargaining issue that the players don't even go that hard on.
 

Hersh

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
19,561
Reputation
2,738
Daps
31,811
just cut the athletic programs that dont generate any positive revenue. let the tens (hundreds?) of thousands of kids each year who would otherwise not have an opportunity to receive a free education down to pay the hundred or so who actually have marketable names in each sport. makes sense. the solution is to allow college athletes to market themselves and their name, and do away with impermissible benefits. if someone wants to give a kid a stack because they liked his dunk last weekend who gives a shyt. thats about it though
just cut the athletic programs that dont generate any positive revenue. let the tens (hundreds?) of thousands of kids each year who would otherwise not have an opportunity to receive a free education down to pay the hundred or so who actually have marketable names in each sport. makes sense. the solution is to allow college athletes to market themselves and their name, and do away with impermissible benefits. if someone wants to give a kid a stack because they liked his dunk last weekend who gives a shyt. thats about it though


that's a start..
 
Top