ACC is the best conference period
ACC is the best conference period
But the other 223 teams either broke even or found ways to claim they lost money as they paid their coaches millions of dollars for a so-called "losing enterprise"
Once again, only the top schools are the ones paying their coaches a lot of money. At the other 300 schools coaches make 150k or less per year.....Fixed that for you.
300 schools are running a program that loses money?Once again, only the top schools are the ones paying their coaches a lot of money. At the other 300 schools coaches make 150k or less per year.....
gotta make sure we keep whitey happyThey could pay em if they wanted to but they can't have nikkas walking around campus in balmain jeans and givenchy hoodies n shyt flexin on all the insecure white boys.
But the coaches making millions and pulling up to campus in Benzes while wearing rolexes is fine doe
Yea maybe u should read? 223 schools are breaking even or losing money. Around 300 are paying their coaches 150k or less per year. Go look for urself if u want. Or keep posting stupid articles like these that are obviously inflated because of the top programs.300 schools are running a program that loses money?
The expenses generated by operating athletics programs continued to exceed the revenue they produce at the vast majority of Football Bowl Subdivision schools in 2014, continuing a trend seen in recent years, according to a new NCAA Study.
Only 24 FBS schools generated more revenue than they spent in 2014, according to the NCAA Revenues and Expenses of Division I Intercollegiate Athletics Programs Report. That figure jumped from 20 schools in 2013, but it has remained relatively consistent through the past decade.
Though the number of athletics departments reporting positive net generated revenues has increased slightly, the average of their net generated revenue has dipped in the past year. Those 24 schools, at the median, generated about $6 million in net revenue, compared to just over $8 million in 2013 and a little more than $2 million a decade ago.
But those 24 schools are a minority. Many more schools saw their expenses exceed their revenue, requiring their colleges and universities to cover the shortfall. The median FBS school spent $14.7 million to help subsidize its athletics department in 2014, up from a little more than $11 million in 2013. That level of spending isn’t unique to FBS schools – median Football Championship Subdivision and non-football schools spent roughly $11 million to help fund athletics in 2014.
"There is still a misperception that most schools are generating more money than they spend on college athletics," said NCAA Chief Financial Officer Kathleen McNeely. "These data show once again that the truth is just the opposite.
"The overwhelming majority of colleges and universities in the NCAA across all three divisions subsidize part or all of athletics. The reason they invest is because sports provide educational value to student-athletes while enhancing overall campus life and building life-long connections with alumni and other supporters. Those are all important outcomes from athletic programs that are worth celebrating, sharing and investing in wisely.”
You've posted articles on schools claiming they make no money.Yea maybe u should read? 223 schools are breaking even or losing money. Around 300 are paying their coaches 150k or less per year. Go look for urself if u want. Or keep posting stupid articles like these that are obviously inflated because of the top programs.
Everyone knows the top schools are rolling in money, its not a secret breh. Maybe u should read up a bit on the other college programs. I've posted 4-5 articles now talking about all of the programs losing money... Here's another good excerpt talking about the football programs again.
You've posted articles on schools claiming they make no money.
A billion dollars is generated by a lot more than the sweet 16.
But you can stay playing stupid and deflecting and caping for white college executives and coaches to earn money but not the ones generating the money.
Every business doesn't make as much money as google.Breh A LOT of college teams do not make anywhere near as much money as you think they do.
You don't really think every school is making money like Bama football and UK basketball do you?
Some college teams can barely support themselves but you expect them to find the money to pay the athletes?
Every business doesn't make as much money as google.
We still support paying employees.
A lot of these clowns are fine with some head coach making 4 million or 400k but a college athlete can't get a fukkin meal.
Somehow I am sure these supposed struggling schools barely making ends meet are not paying their sports coaches and deans 45k a year or some other trash salaryThose business that don't make as much as google but pay employees still made a good amount of profit.
A lot of college teams are barely surviving breh and a few are literally holding onto their last dollar
Believe it or not that is very true.300 schools are running a program that loses money?
Playing with House money. House always wins.But they get free housing, meals, and an education
Surely that makes the net amount negligible