Essential The Africa the Media Doesn't Tell You About

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
19,985
Reputation
6,251
Daps
100,162
Sierra Leoneans with dual nationality are barred from contesting elections in Sierra Leone?

Sierra Leone Telegraph: 10 January 2018:

With less than eight weeks left before general and presidential elections are held in Sierra Leone, last night Sierra Leoneans holding both their country’s citizenship and that of another country, have been told that they are not qualified to stand for parliamentary and presidential elections.

This news has come from the ruling APC, as dozens of Sierra Leoneans working and living abroad have returned home to not only help their respective political parties in campaigning, but have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, into their parties’ election campaign funds.

Several have taken huge bank loans and overdrafts, and packed up their jobs abroad, with the hope of contesting and becoming members of parliament – or appointed government minister after elections. They now feel betrayed and defrauded by the leadership of the ruling APC.

According to the ruling APC, Section 76(1) of the 1991 Constitution, states that: “No person shall be qualified for election as a Member of Parliament — if he is a naturalised citizen of Sierra Leone or is a citizen of a country other than Sierra Leone having become such a citizen voluntarily or is under a declaration of allegiance to such a country.”

But the irony here is that, since the passing of the 1991 Constitution, no government has upheld or enforced this legal requirement. The current Koroma government has several serving ministers and deputy ministers, who should never have been eligible for such posts. Will they now be asked to pay back every single cent they have received in salary and benefits from the State?

Also, there are several high-profile members of the ruling APC party who were allowed to contest the 2012 elections and went on to serve as MPs in their various constituencies, without questions of constitutionality being asked. Who was turning a blind eye?

Today, diaspora based – ruling APC party politicians are crying foul. They are deeply troubled by this ruling, if allowed to go ahead. They say that president Koroma is now using the constitution against them, in favour of home grown politicians, after taking millions of dollars from them.

Most have paid their hard-earned cash into the ruling party campaign funds, with the full confidence that changes made to the nationality laws in 2006 and 2017 will make them eligible to contest elections as citizens of Sierra Leone, despite their dual nationality status. Now, they are being told to go to hell.

But die-hard – constitutional purists in the country, argue that the Constitution must take precedence over any legislation, and that Sierra Leoneans with dual nationality must be denied the right to contest elections in their own country of birth.

This is what Mr. Abdul Bero Kamara (aka – Chief) who is a senior APC party member and former chairman of the party’s north America branch, said:

“What is the big deal about being a dual citizen? It is big deal right now because it is symbol time for people aspiring to go to parliament. Unexpectedly, all those who are aspiring to go to parliament and have dual citizenship have been informed by the Attorney General that they are not qualified because of a provision in the 1991 constitution of Sierra Leone. Oh My God?

“According to Section 76(1), Act No. 6 of the 1991 Constitution: ‘no person shall be qualified for election as a member of Parliament, if he is a naturalized citizen of Sierra Leone or if he is a citizen of a country other than Sierra Leone, having become such a citizen voluntarily or is under a declaration of allegiance to such a country.’

“Are you kidding me? This is bullshyt. I can’t believe this. Who these ******s think we are? Why didn’t they tell us that even before we started spending our hard-earned cash? This will be some of the utterances that will be coming from the mouths of a typical American citizen.

“Superficiality this news has sent a shock wave across the diaspora – the sixth region, and the rumours, innuendoes and speculation and nuances are becoming overwhelming. Politics at its peak, interesting days ahead.

“Ironically, majority of the outgone members of parliament from both the APC and the SLPP had dual citizenship during the last parliament; and interestingly, before they became Honourable in 2012 this law existed, and nobody dared came up with the issue. Whether it was intentional or otherwise, only God knows.

“They served a term of five years, knowing well that they intend to continue once their tenure expired in December 2017, and without a forethought did nothing to amend this very section that has now come back to haunt them.

“This dumbness from these outgone MPs is unimaginable, hence many people including myself would like to know from these MPs, and the former Attorney General and his office : why was this issue not brought up then, until now, why was this section in question not amended by the last parliament ?

“Logically, that means some of these outgone MPs were illegitimate, because they violated the section (of the constitution) in question. So my next question is: Should they be asked to refund back to the state all the emoluments they enjoyed whilst serving as parliamentarians? This should be a serious legal issue. Again, interesting days ahead.

“On the other hand, I think we must give credit to the former Ombudsman of our country – lawyer Mr Francis Gabidon, who couple of months ago drew the attention of the public to this very section. Alas we didn’t pay attention, nor did parliament took it seriously

“Now the D day is here, the aftermath has not started to unfold yet, until after party election symbols have been awarded by the end of the business day. Again interest days ahead.

“By and large, the law is the law and there is no two way about it. Until that part of the constitution is amended, there is nothing anybody can do for now…..”

The debate is raging on social media

Mohamed Gibril Sesay says: “I believe that Party Symbols to Run May be Awarded to Diaspora Sierra Leoneans. I do know that the Constitution has some place where it states that those who have sworn allegiance to another country are not eligible to be members of parliament.

“And that it is not mainly about dual citizenship, for there are categories of dual citizens, for instance Sierra Leonean children who are citizens by birth of other countries but are not barred from running for parliament.

“So there’s this funny situation where your child born in another country can be eligible for parliament, and you born in Sierra Leone but also a citizen by naturalization of another country cannot. I don’t think that was the intent of the drafters of the various citizenship statutes – it looks convoluted, irrational and illogical.

“But that is just one part of it. My view is that legislations since the return of democratic civilian rule in 1996 has expanded rights rather than curtail them. This expansion of rights could be seen from legislation and policies as varied as the two citizenship acts since that time, the gender acts, the transformation of the prison service into the correctional service, the legal aid board, and many more.

“The new reading of the ineligibility of Sierra Leonean with dual citizenship for parliament, pushed unto the public domain by Lawyer Francis Gabidon, flies in the face of this decade plus expansion of rights; that reading is a claw-back interpretation; it flies in the face of the emerging jurisprudence of rights.

“I like Lawyer Adrian Fischer’s take on the matter. His is a jurisprudence of rights that encapsulates modes of interpretation that purposively expand rights and reduce harm. And, the fact that Sierra Leoneans of all political persuasion never brought this ineligibility of the Diaspora for parliamentary and such other positions into the fore, the fact that all of society do know that so many diaspora Sierra Leoneans representing various parties did and do serve in so called ‘ineligibility’ positions; these facts of tacit approval point to an overwhelming society-wide disposition that support this expansion of rights as the intent and purpose of so many laws enacted since 1996.

“Let no one therefore bar our diaspora brothers and sisters from benefiting from this expansion of rights. They are eligible to run for parliament.”

This debate will continue, until there is a legal challenge in the Supreme Court in Freetown, which is where this matter is now heading.

Sierra Leoneans with dual nationality are barred from contesting elections in Sierra Leone?
 

AB Ziggy

Banned
Joined
Dec 14, 2012
Messages
10,686
Reputation
-985
Daps
25,615
Sierra Leoneans with dual nationality are barred from contesting elections in Sierra Leone?

Sierra Leone Telegraph: 10 January 2018:

With less than eight weeks left before general and presidential elections are held in Sierra Leone, last night Sierra Leoneans holding both their country’s citizenship and that of another country, have been told that they are not qualified to stand for parliamentary and presidential elections.

This news has come from the ruling APC, as dozens of Sierra Leoneans working and living abroad have returned home to not only help their respective political parties in campaigning, but have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, into their parties’ election campaign funds.

Several have taken huge bank loans and overdrafts, and packed up their jobs abroad, with the hope of contesting and becoming members of parliament – or appointed government minister after elections. They now feel betrayed and defrauded by the leadership of the ruling APC.

According to the ruling APC, Section 76(1) of the 1991 Constitution, states that: “No person shall be qualified for election as a Member of Parliament — if he is a naturalised citizen of Sierra Leone or is a citizen of a country other than Sierra Leone having become such a citizen voluntarily or is under a declaration of allegiance to such a country.”

But the irony here is that, since the passing of the 1991 Constitution, no government has upheld or enforced this legal requirement. The current Koroma government has several serving ministers and deputy ministers, who should never have been eligible for such posts. Will they now be asked to pay back every single cent they have received in salary and benefits from the State?

Also, there are several high-profile members of the ruling APC party who were allowed to contest the 2012 elections and went on to serve as MPs in their various constituencies, without questions of constitutionality being asked. Who was turning a blind eye?

Today, diaspora based – ruling APC party politicians are crying foul. They are deeply troubled by this ruling, if allowed to go ahead. They say that president Koroma is now using the constitution against them, in favour of home grown politicians, after taking millions of dollars from them.

Most have paid their hard-earned cash into the ruling party campaign funds, with the full confidence that changes made to the nationality laws in 2006 and 2017 will make them eligible to contest elections as citizens of Sierra Leone, despite their dual nationality status. Now, they are being told to go to hell.

But die-hard – constitutional purists in the country, argue that the Constitution must take precedence over any legislation, and that Sierra Leoneans with dual nationality must be denied the right to contest elections in their own country of birth.

This is what Mr. Abdul Bero Kamara (aka – Chief) who is a senior APC party member and former chairman of the party’s north America branch, said:

“What is the big deal about being a dual citizen? It is big deal right now because it is symbol time for people aspiring to go to parliament. Unexpectedly, all those who are aspiring to go to parliament and have dual citizenship have been informed by the Attorney General that they are not qualified because of a provision in the 1991 constitution of Sierra Leone. Oh My God?

“According to Section 76(1), Act No. 6 of the 1991 Constitution: ‘no person shall be qualified for election as a member of Parliament, if he is a naturalized citizen of Sierra Leone or if he is a citizen of a country other than Sierra Leone, having become such a citizen voluntarily or is under a declaration of allegiance to such a country.’

“Are you kidding me? This is bullshyt. I can’t believe this. Who these ******s think we are? Why didn’t they tell us that even before we started spending our hard-earned cash? This will be some of the utterances that will be coming from the mouths of a typical American citizen.

“Superficiality this news has sent a shock wave across the diaspora – the sixth region, and the rumours, innuendoes and speculation and nuances are becoming overwhelming. Politics at its peak, interesting days ahead.

“Ironically, majority of the outgone members of parliament from both the APC and the SLPP had dual citizenship during the last parliament; and interestingly, before they became Honourable in 2012 this law existed, and nobody dared came up with the issue. Whether it was intentional or otherwise, only God knows.

“They served a term of five years, knowing well that they intend to continue once their tenure expired in December 2017, and without a forethought did nothing to amend this very section that has now come back to haunt them.

“This dumbness from these outgone MPs is unimaginable, hence many people including myself would like to know from these MPs, and the former Attorney General and his office : why was this issue not brought up then, until now, why was this section in question not amended by the last parliament ?

“Logically, that means some of these outgone MPs were illegitimate, because they violated the section (of the constitution) in question. So my next question is: Should they be asked to refund back to the state all the emoluments they enjoyed whilst serving as parliamentarians? This should be a serious legal issue. Again, interesting days ahead.

“On the other hand, I think we must give credit to the former Ombudsman of our country – lawyer Mr Francis Gabidon, who couple of months ago drew the attention of the public to this very section. Alas we didn’t pay attention, nor did parliament took it seriously

“Now the D day is here, the aftermath has not started to unfold yet, until after party election symbols have been awarded by the end of the business day. Again interest days ahead.

“By and large, the law is the law and there is no two way about it. Until that part of the constitution is amended, there is nothing anybody can do for now…..”

The debate is raging on social media

Mohamed Gibril Sesay says: “I believe that Party Symbols to Run May be Awarded to Diaspora Sierra Leoneans. I do know that the Constitution has some place where it states that those who have sworn allegiance to another country are not eligible to be members of parliament.

“And that it is not mainly about dual citizenship, for there are categories of dual citizens, for instance Sierra Leonean children who are citizens by birth of other countries but are not barred from running for parliament.

“So there’s this funny situation where your child born in another country can be eligible for parliament, and you born in Sierra Leone but also a citizen by naturalization of another country cannot. I don’t think that was the intent of the drafters of the various citizenship statutes – it looks convoluted, irrational and illogical.

“But that is just one part of it. My view is that legislations since the return of democratic civilian rule in 1996 has expanded rights rather than curtail them. This expansion of rights could be seen from legislation and policies as varied as the two citizenship acts since that time, the gender acts, the transformation of the prison service into the correctional service, the legal aid board, and many more.

“The new reading of the ineligibility of Sierra Leonean with dual citizenship for parliament, pushed unto the public domain by Lawyer Francis Gabidon, flies in the face of this decade plus expansion of rights; that reading is a claw-back interpretation; it flies in the face of the emerging jurisprudence of rights.

“I like Lawyer Adrian Fischer’s take on the matter. His is a jurisprudence of rights that encapsulates modes of interpretation that purposively expand rights and reduce harm. And, the fact that Sierra Leoneans of all political persuasion never brought this ineligibility of the Diaspora for parliamentary and such other positions into the fore, the fact that all of society do know that so many diaspora Sierra Leoneans representing various parties did and do serve in so called ‘ineligibility’ positions; these facts of tacit approval point to an overwhelming society-wide disposition that support this expansion of rights as the intent and purpose of so many laws enacted since 1996.

“Let no one therefore bar our diaspora brothers and sisters from benefiting from this expansion of rights. They are eligible to run for parliament.”

This debate will continue, until there is a legal challenge in the Supreme Court in Freetown, which is where this matter is now heading.

Sierra Leoneans with dual nationality are barred from contesting elections in Sierra Leone?

I don't blame em enacting this rule. If you don't live in the country and have another country's citizenship while living in the other country, your vote shouldn't hold the same weight.
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
19,985
Reputation
6,251
Daps
100,162
I don't blame em enacting this rule. If you don't live in the country and have another country's citizenship while living in the other country, your vote shouldn't hold the same weight.

Actually it looks to be the Chinese that are influencing that policy. It is a version of Russian interference in the USA election.


You can’t shake hands with clenched fists

Abdulai Mansaray: Sierra Leone Telegraph: 16 February 2017:

The social media has been flooded with photos of Chinese nationals actively participating in our political discourse recently. Many people have not only found this surprising but also appalling. There is a general impression that this is an affront on our political make-up.

What makes the images gnawingly galling to the pith is the fact that this is coming hot on the heels of some constitutional gerrymandering by the APC party.

Our respective parties have recently concluded the legal nomination process. But even that has been spiked with protests and petitions against other politicians from especially the APC.

We have just seen how many Sierra Leoneans were disenfranchised, rightly so I may add, by some selective constitutional applications. We agree that the constitution takes a dim view of people with dual citizenships attempting to occupy prominent roles in our political blood stream.

It goes without saying that even though the constitution appears to have been rightly applied, it is the timing and selective amnesia of the ruling party that has left a bitter taste in the mouths of the public.

The influx of workers from China is receiving a mixed reception in Sierra Leone and Africa, where people both admire and resent the hard-working newcomers’ pursuit of wealth.

But if we are to ensure the sustainability of our China partnership, a major concern needs to be addressed: Corruption. Corruption has thrived in our current climate with political and economic impunity; and this has created and increased poverty and exclusion.

While corrupt individuals with deep political ties have enjoyed lavish lifestyles, millions of Sierra Leoneans are deprived of their basic needs like food, health, education, housing, access to clean water and sanitation.

Violence and crime across the country derail efforts to encourage community building and foreign direct investment. If these problems are left unaddressed, the misunderstandings – and potentially serious long-term social issues – could weaken the overall sustainability of the Sierra Leone-China relationship.

Chinese aid to Africa has been criticized as being a form of economic colonization in some quarters. We know that from time immemorial, political aid has been used to create strong bilateral ties between African countries and China.

Many are quick to highlight the structural benefits brought about by aid; but downplay the benefits to China in the form of profit, resource extraction, and the acquisition of service contracts to Chinese companies.

In a nutshell, we know that whichever country offers the greatest economic gains based on China’s growth strategy becomes a target for aid.

It is an open secret that this strategy is geared towards partnering with resource-rich countries like Sierra Leone, which lacks the political and economic structures required to efficiently and effectively manage our bilateral trade opportunities.

The key challenge we face is to ensure that there is an effective political and economic strategy to piggyback off Chinese intervention to ensure broad based economic empowerment.

It is understandable if immigrants in Sierra Leone have a soft spot for certain political parties. I don’t usually use the word “immigrant” for others. I am used to being described as such. So please indulge me to enjoy it for once.

But back to the point, it is not criminal for such immigrants in our country to have their own political persuasion. But it is not common to see such immigrants clearly flaunting their support for a particular party. The photos showing Chinese nationals openly taking part in our national campaign rallies is a break from tradition. There are many who would be surprised at this brazen show of support.

It is no secret that the Chines are now our biggest partners in our development process. We know that the Chinese have invested a lot of money and effort in almost every sphere of our social-economic life; ranging from mining, business, infrastructure etc. The majority of Sierra Leoneans are very grateful for this.

The Angolan president Jose Eduardo dos Santos recently said that, “China is now a vital partner for the development of our continent.

To confirm this, just keep in mind that since 2013 China has become the largest trading partner of Africa and has increased by more than 44 percent of its direct investment in the continent.”

The Republic of Congo’s President Denis Sassou N’Guesso said that “In recent years, we have seen that China is on the ground, providing massive support to development efforts in African countries. There are statistics to prove this; the projects are visible, from one country to another.” These facts are undeniable.

The Chinese have always been seen by other Western countries as politically immoral. Unlike the other western nations, they have been criticised for not attaching good and democratic governance as a caveat for international cooperation with African leaders or countries.

The Chinese have been known to do business with the worst dictators in Africa. They have never been known to interfere in the domestic political affairs of their host countries. They have been known to do business, and only business; irrespective of whether the leaders are autocratic, despotic, and dictatorial or chairmen for life. It is against this backdrop that many find this recent trend nauseatingly frontal.

But if we are to consider the amount of Chinese investment in our country today, many would find their recent forage into our political affairs understandable. Many will see this as reflective of the society for self-preservation. By implication, others will see their interference as merely “protecting their interests”; and many may not begrudge them for that.

The increased Chinese presence in our country and the majority of its contracts has been signed with the ruling party. So is it in their interests that the ruling party stays in power? Don’t answer that.

Does it mean that the Chinese feel the need to engage visibly in our domestic politics is a mark of desperation? Is there an unspoken message here? Does this mean that the usual confidence of victory on the part of the ruling party is no longer taken for granted? Do the Chinese feel that their interests are at stake here, and that a change of government would threaten their investments? Does the ruling party feel the need to employ foreign muscle here; as a way of reminding the benefits of the Chinese to our country? If so, what would the Chinese “interference” mean for the ruling party?

Does it mean that the ruling APC party is in panic mode or is a reflection of political nerve jangling jitters? Have the Chinese felt that this is no longer a time to sit back and be spectators? Are there any political gains to be made by their involvement? Is this in anyway expected to gain some political clout or mileage for the APC?

The influence and presence of the Chinese in our country is as obvious as daylight. But do they feel compelled to actively engage in our politics. Is this an act of desperation on the part of the Chinese or the government?

In spite of their visible presence in our country, there are many who feel that our country has been disproportionately mortgaged to the Chinese. Rumours have it that our country has been saddled with debts to the Chinese, and that it will be paid for by generations to come.

From the toll road, the roads, the Bandasoka hydro in Port Loko, and the recently touted airport at Mamamah, are just a few that have been peddled. It is inconceivable that anyone would object to these “developments”. But will the Chinese go further to demand good governance, zero corruption, equity etc., to ensure that this partnership benefits the majority and not the few?

Many believe that the contracts for these projects, although vital, have been badly negotiated to the detriment of the country. Others feel that the tax brackets and sweeteners of the mining contracts are pittance to the country. Many feel that certain individuals have personally profited from most of these contracts.

Rumours have it that on the eve of the dissolution of our parliament, the government hastily signed various mining contracts with the Chinese. Take for example the buses that were purchased for our national transport ministry. Most of the buses have since become eyesores in the graveyard of the transport ministry. It is this lack of value for money that has left a bitter taste in the mouths of many. It is no wonder that some have a negative view of the Chinese partnership.

We need to replace our clan based economic feudalism with an economic empowerment, which will in turn promote political development leading to a healthier international trade relations. Our partnership with China can definitely provide an employment sponge to absorb our labour market. As a country, we need to be competitive in this partnership.

Sierra Leone may be at the tip of an economic renaissance that will see opportunities being created that were considered impossible a few decades ago. But, this requires strong leadership in both politics and business.

As citizens, we should be able to hold our political leaders accountable, specifically to promote broad-based economic empowerment, to ensure that the maximum number of people benefit from this growth. I think, China can help us here from the top, not at grassroots level with campaigning.

The irony is not lost on many Sierra Leoneans, especially those in the diaspora. While the ruling party is spending time telling their citizens abroad that their Sierra Leonean citizenship is questionable; thanks to some constitutional gymnastics, it is apparently opening doors to non-citizens like the Chinese, to participate actively in determining who leads our country for the next 5 years. What a cheek.

There are some who actually see this as the re-colonisation of our country; Chinese style. If one can tell a fellow Sierra Leonean, who was born and bred in Sierra Leone that they do not have the right to actively participate in their country’s political discourse, thanks to their dual citizenships, where is the moral platform to encourage others that were neither born, nor bred in our country to do so? Double standards come to mind here.

The recently concluded American presidential elections continue to be saddled with the allegations of Russian interference. Are we witnessing a similar case with the Chinese here? While the Russians are accused of doing so by cyber means, it looks like ours is “gbangba oday”. What a cheek.

For all I know, the Chinese are more than welcome. We are seeing tangible results from their partnership. The worry is; at what price? Are we being short-changed here? You be the judge.

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about the things that matter (M. L. King).


You can’t shake hands with clenched fists
 

Red Shield

Global Domination
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
21,329
Reputation
2,457
Daps
47,422
Reppin
.0001%
Actually it looks to be the Chinese that are influencing that policy. It is a version of Russian interference in the USA election.


You can’t shake hands with clenched fists

You can’t shake hands with clenched fists


man..... they have got to get it together. fukk up and those future generations are gonna be left with one option..

which is to kill those foreigners
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
393
Reputation
150
Daps
820
Reppin
Stoic disciples
Wow. I didn't know most of their government and defense was ran by 6% of the population.

I wonder how this will affect their situation with Eygpt.
:sas1: the Oromo panelist insisting the President of the Oromiya region is the only person capable of holding the country together. Probably what every Ethiopian would say about their regional president.
 
Last edited:

The Odum of Ala Igbo

Hail Biafra!
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
17,969
Reputation
2,965
Daps
52,725
Reppin
The Republic of Biafra
Southern Africa has the ball now imo. Lets see if they can throw some more touchdowns and win it or fumble it.

I fear Ramaphosa won't be able to mitigate South Africa's structural issues. I just learnt that 7 million South Africans are HIV positive. An increase from 5 million in the early 2000s
:mjcry:

I wonder if South Africa's too late in attracting labour intensive, low skill industry like Ethiopia
:jbhmm:
 
Top