Except that charge doesn't really account for or specify the psychological trauma inflicted on the people who kill one of the robbers in the course of action.Or the robbers could, you know, be charged with robbery.
Except that charge doesn't really account for or specify the psychological trauma inflicted on the people who kill one of the robbers in the course of action.Or the robbers could, you know, be charged with robbery.
Except that charge doesn't really account for or specify the psychological trauma inflicted on the people who kill one of the robbers in the course of action.
This is where you're absolutely wrong and I left out a part anyway. A killing occurred because of the actions of people who decided to invade homes. Once you invade homes in certain states you have essentially forfeit your life and that of your companions if the homeowner feels compelled to defend themselves. Couple this with being armed and people will assume you were going to use force against other human beings you encountered in the domicile. Thus the killing of anyone during the process of these robberies should absolutely be placed on the robbers in the minds of people who made these laws.Causing "psychological trauma", whatever that is, isn't a crime.
can you imagine being 16 and getting 65 yearssssss!!
even if you turn his age numbers around it still doesn't beat 65 years!!
This is where you're absolutely wrong and I left out a part anyway. A killing occurred because of the actions of people who decided to invade homes. Once you invade homes in certain states you have essentially forfeit your life and that of your companions if the homeowner feels compelled to defend themselves. Couple this with being armed and people will assume you were going to use force against other human beings you encountered in the domicile. Thus the killing of anyone during the process of these robberies should absolutely be placed on the robbers in the minds of people who made these laws.
We know the law bytch. It's still a shytty law. Especially for a 15 year oldFelony Murder
The felony murder rule is a rule that allows a defendant to be charged with first-degree murder for a killing that occurs during a dangerous felony, even if the defendant is not the killer. The felony murder rule applies only to those crimes that are considered “inherently dangerous,” as the rationale underlying the felony murder rule is that certain crimes are so dangerous that society wants to deter individuals from engaging in them altogether. Thus, when a person participates in an inherently dangerous crime, he or she may be held responsible for the fatal consequences of that crime, even if someone else caused the actual death.
The felony murder rule is an exception to the normal rules of homicide. Normally, a defendant can be convicted of murder only if a prosecutor shows that the defendant acted with the intent to kill or with a reckless indifference to human life. Under the felony murder rule, however, a defendant can be convicted of murder even if the defendant did not act with intent or a reckless indifference; the prosecution must show only that the defendant participated in a felony where fatalities occurred.
LEARN THE LAW
ain't nobody late. The law is shut regardlessThe Coli is late. That law and been around for a while and is law in most states.
If someone dies while committing a crime yall are all going down for murder. That has been known.
We know the law bytch. It's still a shytty law. Especially for a 15 year old
He's 19 with 65 yearscan you imagine being 16 and getting 65 yearssssss!!
even if you turn his age numbers around it still doesn't beat 65 years!!