One of the apologists called Coates a propagandist
which is hilarious since he was always been a safe read for white liberals
One of the apologists called Coates a propagandist
He was intellectually dishonest, racist, dog whistling and of course turns out to be a Zionist Jew himself.To be fair, none of us has read the book yet. I bought the book based on the interview and I'm a big fan of Ta-Nehisi Coates and I didn't even know this was coming out. I'm sorry a journalist has every right to ask these questions and I'm glad he did.
Neither. I got something out this that I wouldn't have if the host didn't ask these questions.He was intellectually dishonest, racist, dog whistling and of course turns out to be a Zionist Jew himself.
You’re either slow or just trolling for a reaction.
Nothing wrong with asking questionsNeither. I got something out this that I wouldn't have if the host didn't ask these questions.
I respect journalism. If you write the book that Coates has written and that I'm currently reading, you should be able to answer these questions.
Yeah, I don't really care about the approach. I enjoyed Coates answers, and I don't get those without the host asking questions.Nothing wrong with asking questions
He was awful with his approach
This was an embarrassing attempt to destroy the man’s book. One of the more shameful media interviews I’ve seen in a long time. Nate and Gail had nothing to say about the two other aspects of the book - black focused topics…..A stark reminder that black faces in media are generally just pawns.
Finally, Doukapils wife, Katy Tur, is also trash, and a low level journalist…nothing to do with the topic, I just want to hate.