Red Shield
Global Domination
Arrogant
Put all of her eggs in one basket and now look at her legacy..
As I reported in April, behind closed doors McConnell has been raising money from big conservative donors for months by promising that no matter how close it might be to the election, he would install Trump’s Supreme Court pick. As a former Trump White House official told me, “McConnell’s been telling our donors that when R.B.G. meets her reward, even if it’s October, we’re getting our judge. He’s saying it’s our October surprise.”
But now that the moment is here, the calculation isn’t quite so simple. On Friday night, McConnell released a statement vowing that a Trump nominee “will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate.” While McConnell’s obstruction of Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, made him the bane of liberals, he has regarded it with pride as the single “most important decision I’ve made in my political career.” He and many others believe it handed Trump his victory by motivating the politically powerful evangelical bloc to vote for Trump, despite their doubts about him, because he promised to fill the Court vacancy with a social conservative. It’s entirely possible that the same scenario will play out again this November, with Trump and McConnell offering another enticing gift to evangelicals.
But McConnell is also what Ornstein calls “a ruthless pragmatist,” whose No. 1 goal has always been to remain Majority Leader of the Senate. He’s made the conservative makeover of the federal court system his pet project, but if he faces a choice between another right-wing Justice and losing his control of the Senate, no one who knows him well thinks he’d hesitate for a moment to do whatever is necessary to stay in power. In fact, back in the summer of 2016, when it looked like Trump would lose to Hillary Clinton, far from being distressed at his party’s dim prospects, McConnell was savoring the probability of being the single most powerful Republican in the country, according to a confidant who spoke with him then.
This is remarkable
Carter didn’t have SCOTUS picks but he and Dem Congress expanded the Federal Bench.
1967. He was appointed by President Lyndon B. Johnson.When was Thurgood Marshall appointed?
Yeah where are those guys.
Even they can't pretend they aren't excited to get another individual on the court. Largely absent.
1967. He was appointed by President Lyndon B. Johnson.
I thought so, which is why he wasn't included when they said "the past 53 years?" Unless they meant SINCE LBJ appointed Marshall.
John Paul Stevens & David Souter is why the Federalist Society goes so hard at pushing for far-right fascist judges to be nominatedProbably meant since.
Even still, that gap is crazy.
John Paul Stevens and David Souter moving liberal is the only reason it hasn't been a 6-3 court it looks like. BTW, Souter is 81 years old and replaced by Sotomayor.