SUPERMAN by James Gunn (Coming 2025)

[Bryan Danielson]

 

[EzekelRAGE]

Damn dem titties looking good, look even better in the vid

 

[Bryan Danielson]

 

[jdubnyce]

Tom and Dean got fat as fukk
Face looking alcohol bloated

 

[Ironman]

fukk Dean Cain. Tim Daly and George the animated GOATS

 

[CHICAGO]

DAMN DEAN CAIN
AND SMALLVILLE LOOK CRAZY



​

 

[valet]

Superman meets Superman

 

[Bryan Danielson]

Superman meets Superman

I don’t see Dwight Howard, just David Corenswet and 2 guys

 

[Jaguar93]

 

[jay211]

He's desperately trying to win over the SNYDER BROS, so they don't tank his movie

 

[Hopeofmypeople]

Hopefully Snyder kept some of his consummate opinions to himself. Can’t have him stinking up the place again.

 

[jdubnyce]

He's desperately trying to win over the SNYDER BROS, so they don't tank his movie

You see it

 

[Hopeofmypeople]

Trailer expected to drop this week.

 

[THE 101]

‘Superman’ Screens to Mixed Reactions​

Q. With all the reports about “Superman” finally being test-screened by an audience, what have you been hearing? (Matt Boehner)

There's the old claim that test screenings don't make a movie. Still, It’s interesting how James Gunn and Warner Bros have allowed “Superman” to test so openly given the inevitable leaks that could occur, not to mention the risk of having negative reactions pummeling advanced hype.

Yes, a few days ago, “Superman” had its first non-internal test screening — I only spoke to a few attendees. Suffice it to say, they both felt underwhelmed by Gunn’s film, and I'm being kind here. No need to taint the film further.

Now, reporting on two people who didn’t like “Superman” doesn't mean much in terms of quality. I've heard of people being turned off by the inherent humor, and silliness, that comes with a James Gunn movie — which Superman seems to have in spades.

So far, based on what’s leaked, we've had the usual “scoopers” weighing on the reactions. MyTimeToShineHello says the reactions were “decidedly mixed.” According to “insider” Daniel Richtman, people he spoke to “loved it.”

Yesterday, scooper ViewerAnon shared, "The response I heard directly from Warner Bros was decidedly less glowing than Daniel [Richtman]'s post. Not to say it went terribly, but it’s a divisive film with a particularly silly tone. Some people click with it, some seem to bounce right off."

A few weeks ago, a report indicated that “Superman,” or at least the cut shown on the Warner lot, was “kind of a mess.” It went on to say that Warner was starting to get “nervous” about the film.

They should be “nervous.” If “Superman” fails then Gunn’s planned DCU might crumble alongside it. Warner Bros. has invested a lot of money in this film, rumored to approach the $300M mark, and they’re betting all of their chips on it. Forget about “Mickey 17,” and “One Battle After Another”; for Warner Bros, the future begins and ends with “Superman.”

‘Superman’ Screens to Mixed Reactions — World of Reel

A few weeks ago, a report indicated that “Superman,” or at least the cut shown on the Warner lot, was “kind of a mess.” It went on to say that Warner was starting to get “nervous” about the film.

www.worldofreel.com

 

[AnonymityX1000]

‘Superman’ Screens to Mixed Reactions​

‘Superman’ Screens to Mixed Reactions — World of Reel

A few weeks ago, a report indicated that “Superman,” or at least the cut shown on the Warner lot, was “kind of a mess.” It went on to say that Warner was starting to get “nervous” about the film.

www.worldofreel.com

Yeah, watched a scooper say it's basically a GotG treatment for Superman. I like GotG and Gunn's stuff generally so I think it will be good. But I think a lot of DC heads are hung up on their stuff being "Herm. . . . Serious" so might not be what everyone is looking for.